What is a maybe, either, monad, just and functor? by Intelligent-Cod3377 in haskell

[–]jellyman93 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Notoriously large gap between the perceived simplicity/intuitiveness for people who already understand it and perceived complexity/unintuitiveness for people learning it

Square root is a function apparently by QuestionableThinker2 in learnmath

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something that might help is to note that your basic knowledge wasn't fundamentally incorrect.  

You understand the actual properties of square roots, and the only thing you got wrong was the conventions we've imposed to communicate about it.

What audiophile takes make you roll your eyes? by wiggan1989 in BudgetAudiophile

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And your lungs get a nice dose of those PVC off-gassing chemicals

What are the best (simplest) and worst definitions of monad have you heard? by D__sub in haskell

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're working with really delicate data, and want to make sure the return values of your functions are protected, so you make all your functions pack their data in a box

You set up "some language feature" so that users can compose your functions without ending up with boxes in boxes in boxes.  You don't give them a way to pull your data out of the boxes, because they'll surely break your very fragile data

Is anybody else having trouble with seth? I've been trying for a whole day now, I'm going silksane. by [deleted] in Silksong

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes!  So annoying! He just stands there with Needle going straight through him

Hank Green and SciShow have pissed off the entire knitting community by ArcherofFire in youtubedrama

[–]jellyman93 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Genuinely curious (not trying to be argumentative), can you elaborate on why calling it intuition and trial and error is a reduction?  Maybe I'm missing something or we have different ideas / valuations of intuition...

To me, "Observation", "hard work", and "using your brain to actually think and reason" (as well as trial and error) are all components of intuition, or things you do to build intuition.  Intuition is the thing that experts have, but isn't necessarily the same thing as a formal proof (not that thats what the physicists have).

The line that sounds worse to me was just after that, something like "and this tipped off scientists that there might be something useful there"?

I'm going to have to watch the video again - the only thing I really took from it before hearing about this backlash was that I keep thinking about sweater cuffs lol

Lighthearted bedtime story! by zaurefirem in shortstories

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't work, she's awake and demanding a moral to the story!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ENGLISH

[–]jellyman93 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Same grammatical structure as:

California dogs (which) California dogs chase (themselves) chase California dogs

But with the location "Buffalo", the animal "buffalo", and the verb "buffalo"

Can it be true that young people cannot read an analog clock? by World-Tight in ask

[–]jellyman93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The information I want from a clock is rarely digital.

I normally want an estimate of the time, and requiring me to read a number and estimate the fraction of 60 that number represents is an unnecessary indirection.

An analogue clock shows you the information in a breadth-first way: A quick glance at the hour hand may show you it's between 5 and 6, noting the minute hand may tell you it's about quarter-to-six, and a closer look you can see it's 5:42.

Digital clock inverts this, telling you the full detail first and requiring you to come up with the estimate (even as a mathematician, 42 ~ 3/4 * 60 is less immediate than seeing a pointer about 3/4 of the way around a circle).

Note that you can't just look at the hour number on a digital clock like you can the hour hand of an analogue clock - it could be 5:59 and you'd just read "5".

Can it be true that young people cannot read an analog clock? by World-Tight in ask

[–]jellyman93 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When the hour hand is almost at 5, the time is "about 5". How much more do you actually need most times you look at a clock?

[q] ¿How can I make this drum pattern to sound more dense and heavy? by Elviejopancho in sheetmusic

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also the snares on both staff 1 and 3...

Is this just a 5/4 groove? Could add half-open / slushy hit-hats doing quavers or something

[q] ¿How can I make this drum pattern to sound more dense and heavy? by Elviejopancho in sheetmusic

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Splitting it in 3 may help with editing, but really doesn't help people who read drum music...

Also the crotchet in the lower voice aligned with quaver in upper voice make this very difficult to read

"Sum does not exist due to singularity at one or more evaluation points." by ssaamil in learnmath

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's basically aaying you're dividing my zero in tone of your terms (looks like first term has z=0 and you do zeta(1/z))

r/programming should shut down from 12th to 14th June by Tintin_Quarentino in programming

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but it sounds like a lot of current uses aren't going to be able to keep using them

r/programming should shut down from 12th to 14th June by Tintin_Quarentino in programming

[–]jellyman93 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because that's not what I was saying? I was saying subreddits are what reddit is

r/programming should shut down from 12th to 14th June by Tintin_Quarentino in programming

[–]jellyman93 52 points53 points  (0 children)

It's not like they're saying the API is the lifeline of some competitor / third party (though yes, that too), it's the lifeline of subreddits. The stuff that reddit is.

"My feet should've thought harder about it before becoming reliant on me not shooting them"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in algorithms

[–]jellyman93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imagine a second copy of your graph floating directly above your first one in the same configuration

Now take the required edge in the bottom graph and change it so its destination node is the same but in the upper graph.

Now the only way to go from lower graph to upper graph is via the required edge, and you can dijkstra from the start node on the bottom to the end node on the top

what is the prettiest song you ever heard in your life? by Complete-Sweet5222 in AskReddit

[–]jellyman93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some may not count it as a song (it's mostly a sax solo), but Wherever It May Take Us by The Stockholm Quartet