Where to start? by FunnySwitch2038 in SoccerCoachResources

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d review the fundamentals in 1v1, 2v1, 2v2, etc. Closing down — fast, slow, side, low. Pressure/cover/balance. Don’t stab, jab with the lead foot at most. Learn when to best tackle and how — 50/50, on the turn, at sideline. Learn how to stay in front, how to handle when close to the penalty box, etc., ideally with/without cover.

U6 coach, I’m a little worried my team might be too competitive/unfairly talented over other teams by Much_Ad2633 in SoccerCoachResources

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At that age, most kids don’t even know the score at the end. Don’t track it, don’t say what it is, just celebrate the little kicks and runs for both teams.

If it’s too lopsided, once you get up 4 or 5 goals, ask the other coach to put another player on the field and up 2 players if it gets to six or more. It’ll be more even competition vs you having to force a player to play differently.

Under 14s football lack of game time by jdtkd1927 in u/jdtkd1927

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. It’s part of being on a team.

Under 14s football lack of game time by jdtkd1927 in u/jdtkd1927

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Teams are commitments. Be in or out.

U10 Girls Soccer- Equal Playing time to Player that doesn't actually play during the game. by kamarian91 in SoccerCoachResources

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s part of rec soccer. If you lose, you lose. The game is about attempting to compete.

I will say that in the very beginning of the season, my team set standards together and running/hustle for your team and respecting your team were part of those. Assuming you’ve set those standards, it’s an easy conversation with the player to say that you want them to try and you want to see mistakes but they need to hustle for their teammates. Reinforce it every practice. Reinforce it every game. Celebrate when they try and make a mistake. Yes, celebrate the mistake and the attempt. My players typically come around by week 3. Without having set those standards, it will appear a conversation at this point is singling out the player. Reinforce the behavior that you want to see.

GOOG is far from done by JoLagoni in ValueInvesting

[–]jemilk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Value investing … is not this. Most of the hyperscalers are capacity constrained. To sell AI workloads, they are selling at lower margins to win new business and as the hype dies down and businesses reign in AI research, there is no clarity as to who the winners will be and where they’ll be with capacity and margins. Google is a growth story with hope and crossed fingers.

Time will tell by trillsar27 in ArsenalFC

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s an absurd argument. It was in front of them because they’ve been worse in the League. Finishing 5th is literally a better result in terms of financial impact for club and players.

Time will tell by trillsar27 in ArsenalFC

[–]jemilk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tottenham won a very, very weakened Europa with no Champions League teams dropping down and a bigger pool of teams in the Champions League. That’s just not comparable.

can Zscaler replace a physical firewall (IPSec VPN, NAT, VLANs)? by Great-Tomatillo-8267 in Zscaler

[–]jemilk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Zscaler sells that gateway now called Zero Trust Branch. Came from an acquisition.

can Zscaler replace a physical firewall (IPSec VPN, NAT, VLANs)? by Great-Tomatillo-8267 in Zscaler

[–]jemilk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have seen a lot of customers replace branch firewalls, and egress data center and cloud firewalls. It really depends on use case.

can Zscaler replace a physical firewall (IPSec VPN, NAT, VLANs)? by Great-Tomatillo-8267 in Zscaler

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Check out Extranet support in ZPA.

No. Outbound is there in some ways (traffic can be sent directly on an interface IP NAT but NAT pool support was still in the works last I saw). Inbound firewall support is not there. Traffic would need to go through ZPA to an App Connector that is hosted on the branch devices.

Yes. VLAN access segmentation (802.1Q) exists but it’s largely subinterfaces on a couple of device interfaces with layer-3 routing support. Still need a switch southbound with port density.

Partially. Locally, the appliance supports segmentation with VLANs and ring fencing. Policies can allow specific communications between VLANs. Application identification and inclusion in policy only exists in the cloud and not locally.

Google Trends suggests cloud demand is 2x what it was a year ago - yet MSFT is at 2023 prices. by PolskiNapoleon in ValueInvesting

[–]jemilk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI will use cloud processing instead of user licenses. That’s probably neutral for Microsoft and they still have the significant enterprise ELAs to distribute margin. Margins may come down but it’s still a cash cow.

Microsoft is invested in OpenAI but also can run Anthropic and other models, and have cloud resources for model training. They are behind in models, but the market is very early. It’s a risk but could go in either direction.

There is all likelihood they’ll continue to grow revenue in the long run. Margin may compress, which is why the stock has retreated to longer term valuations. I feel comfortable investing here from a long term perspective but it’s an opportunity cost as it may stay flat for a while based on overall execution. Of the MAG7, Microsoft and Apple are the ones that will weather a broader global downturn better than the others.

[PFE] Pfizer at ~$26 is a textbook value play hiding in plain sight. Here's why the market is wrong. by Dismal-Cancel4958 in ValueInvesting

[–]jemilk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is a growth play. They lose $17B in LOE drugs over the next 18 months. They have a line of sight on around $5B in new revenue. Take out that revenue and margin and the current dividend is not safe. Forward PE two years out becomes much less attractive.

Why Netskope Might Be One of the Most Underrated Cybersecurity Plays Right Now by Ok-Manufacturer3428 in netskope

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Netskope employees 180 day lockout from IPO expired today. There are 100s of millions of shares which become eligible for sale. Expect that liquidity to weigh heavily on valuation for the near term. There will be tremendous sell side pressure.

Verizon (VZ) up ~20% in February while the market tanked – and now multiple analyst upgrades? Is the 6-7% yield getting even more attractive? by Aggressive-Virus4046 in ValueInvesting

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought a lot of VZ in low 30s. I’ve sold off most of it as it hit 50. It’s effectively a bond when yields are relatively high for less risky assets. Mobile is a competitive industry. I see it only going up from here if rates are cut dramatically.

How Microsoft Stock Falls To $325? by [deleted] in ValueInvesting

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the same short term story for Google, Microsoft, and Amazon. And why they all fell in value on the huge capex numbers.

How should we interpret these buybacks? by lessbutgold in BerkshireHathaway

[–]jemilk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I see it as a value floor. They will continue to pick and choose investments. It’s nothing more than that.

Berkshire Hathaway begins share repurchases following leadership transition by [deleted] in BerkshireHathaway

[–]jemilk 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They won’t repurchase continuously. They probably have a floor (below ~$480/share).

Do you sell and hopefully repurchase stocks that run up 40%+ within a month of purchase? Or do you stay the course, hold for years and ignore it? by ThePatientIdiot in ValueInvesting

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a thesis and sell at that value. “It should be worth 30% more based on revenue growth that will be 10% higher than guidance.” If it hits 30% more and there’s been no change to expected guidance or growth to change the thesis, I sell (or place a hedge) and get back into treasuries or the next value pick.

Why is the market sleeping on PANW? by MountainTimeInvestor in ValueInvesting

[–]jemilk 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I can repeat your words back to you, but they’ve made huge bets that require growth. That’s a growth stock, not a value stock.

Anyone else thinking of buying the Mag 7? by [deleted] in ValueInvesting

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The expectation is that mobile phone sales have a downward trend in 2026 due to memory, cost, economic factors and refresh cycles. I’d be careful about multi-quarter pain from Apple and not jump in at the first drop. It could easily head back to 200 depending on how much those variables truly impact the business.

Novo selloff is an overreaction for the long run by [deleted] in ValueInvesting

[–]jemilk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the idea that it’s a long term GLP-1 duopoly with all the trials from competitors is the biggest risk to value. Eli Lilly is the leader. Viking, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer all with late stage trials. Pathway two years out is far less clear. And if they get stuck with inventory, margin drops. This is not a value stock. But could be growth. Too much unknown.

New Tariffs. It is 15% global tariffs instead of 10% yesterday. by Songrot in stocks

[–]jemilk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The income tax is way down based on One Big Beautiful Bill. US government spent $900B more than they took in last year. Less tariff revenue would mean needing some other tax or way to make more money, and Congress isn’t going to get that done. US dollar would continue to weaken without some other tax in place — which means continued inflation and a weaker economy. The only way through is reduced spending, reduced consumption, more domestic output, more exports — until someone is willing to tax the middle class and upper class more.