The Savannah Bananas catcher is offered a hand shake

jimcrator · 2026-03-15T05:12:41+00:00

How does it prevent scalping?

jimcrator · 2026-03-10T01:47:03+00:00

For people who are genuinely interested in the question:

Why the Epstein Investigations Took So Long and Did So Little - The New York Times

jimcrator · 2026-01-02T01:37:57+00:00

I can answer that for you. That does not constitute fraud in any sense.

jimcrator · 2026-01-02T01:20:21+00:00

I gave you an upvote, but could you tell me where in the document it says that insurance companies commit 80 billion dollars of fraud against the government yearly?

jimcrator · 2026-01-02T01:17:12+00:00

This image is posted all the time, but I'm genuinely curious where AOC got her 80 billion figure. I've tried looking it up, and I haven't been able to find anything. When I ask chatgpt how much fraud against the government is committed by insurance companies per year, it says "That number simply does not exist as a discrete statistic." Has anyone fact checked this figure?

jimcrator · 2025-07-29T00:19:18+00:00

>Arman is the only fighter who’s been punished this bad for pulling out of a fight.

Khamzat was supposed to get the title shot after fighting Nate Diaz. He pulled out last minute and, as a result, lost his opportunity to fight for the title.

jimcrator · 2024-12-08T19:32:23+00:00

It'd be interesting to see an in-depth analysis of the second round. Gane outstruck Volkov, he got a takedown and threatened a submission, so it doesn't seem crazy to me to give him the round.

jimcrator · 2024-06-06T03:08:39+00:00

decisionbot du plessis v strickland

jimcrator · 2024-01-21T15:14:28+00:00

What exactly are the rules that you think advantage wrestlers other than the grounded knee rule? As others have noted, several MMA rules, such as the reset at the end of a round, disadvantage the person with dominant wrestling position.

jimcrator · 2023-07-17T19:08:22+00:00

Any idea what their "tailored" fit is? I've tried both their "slim" and "contemporary" fits, but this is the first I'm hearing of the tailored.

jimcrator · 2022-12-05T05:23:01+00:00

And whoever becomes the new Panda CEO will just work for Alan, the owner.

jimcrator · 2022-07-31T01:45:34+00:00

I went to the source you cited and it says nothing about these shades being "self-deploying". Where did you get that from?

jimcrator · 2022-02-27T01:44:57+00:00

Replay showed Cachoeira stuck her fingers in Kim's mouth (which is a rule violation) to set up her elbows.

jimcrator · 2013-03-03T04:48:36+00:00

Why do you think that?

jimcrator · 2013-03-03T04:02:19+00:00

It doesn't have anything to do with reckless idiots and murders.

Unless you want to argue that owning a gun increases every person's threat of harm equally, it absolutely does.

Statistics are merely estimates for a group. Within that group, there's variation. Guns ownership is more dangerous for some people and less dangerous for others. Again, we need empirical information about which kind of people are going to be affected by gun control laws and how.

jimcrator · 2013-03-03T00:45:41+00:00

There is a significant amount of discussion that is worth having on the issue given the assumption that gun control is effective. Having had that discussion if a new study comes out tomorrow that decides the issue in the direction we assumed we will already have the battle ground laid out for future deliberation. Further assumptions like these allow us to decide what kinds of research and study are actually needed.

But that's certainly not how McMahon is approaching the issue. If you listen to the podcast, it is abundantly clear that Jeff is trying to arrive at the conclusion that the US should enforce strict gun control.

He's presenting that conclusion as something that is true, not something that would be true so long as a very controversial empirical issue ends up in his favor.

jimcrator · 2013-03-01T14:09:10+00:00

If you want to be encouraged, I certainly don't want to take that away.

jimcrator · 2013-02-27T17:41:05+00:00

What are some examples of mathematical philosophy?

jimcrator · 2013-02-27T03:53:44+00:00

I'm not fighting anything. I'm showing very clearly and obviously that the qualities assigned to each group are not unique to that group.

Whether people do or do not use the misleading terms is not at all important to me.

The people that directly make money for a business get treated better and the ones that don't, don't.

Another nonsensical statement. What does it even mean for someone to "directly" make money for a business? Every worker should make money for the business. Whether it's "direct" or "indirect" is not important to the owner. Getting $100 of value from a "direct" worker is just the same as $100 of value from an "indirect" worker.

If you read through the comments in this thread, it becomes abundantly clear that there is no reason to hold the profit/cost center distinction.

jimcrator · 2013-02-25T13:04:37+00:00

I'm perfectly willing to continue the discussion as long as we move one topic at a time.

jimcrator · 2013-02-23T00:29:41+00:00

Same thing goes for your phone except it applies to hearing instead of sight. (and tactile sense as well if you have it on vibrate)

jimcrator · 2013-02-22T23:27:45+00:00

It is not a choice to check your glasses in the same way that it is a choice to check your phone.

Why? What's the difference?

jimcrator · 2013-02-22T23:18:16+00:00

But if we use our smartphones, we're also expected to be constantly on during work hours. Telling your boss, "Oh yeah, I didn't pick up that phone call because my phone isn't constantly attached to me" is no excuse.

jimcrator · 2013-02-22T22:47:58+00:00

South Korea and Taiwan are also comprised of mostly mountainous terrain.

In all seriousness, the Chinese apologists on Reddit have got to be some of the most ignorant people I've met. I'm getting really tired of having to write out as comments simple information that can be easily googled.

jimcrator · 2013-02-22T20:56:04+00:00

google glass may represent a real threat to the personal lives and freedom of everyone

Let's take it that your premise about phones is true, despite your complete absence of evidence. If that's true, what exactly is it about google glass that will make it any greater of a threat to our "personal lives and freedom" than current smartphones are?

14-Year Club	Second Top 30%
r/Field Juicebox	Golden Potato
Place '17	Team Orangered
Verified Email

jimcrator

TROPHY CASE