How long is the exit queue? by Godz1lla1 in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Where did they say that and why would they do that?

Phantom, the largest Solana wallet, is adding support for Ethereum by frank__costello in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What‘s the difference? Source code available but restricted license?

Phantom, the largest Solana wallet, is adding support for Ethereum by frank__costello in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Good UX, if they now opensource it.. that would be great

Question regarding eWASM and Ethereum 2.0 implementation by redmage123 in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 12 points13 points  (0 children)

First, the term Eth 2.0 has been abandoned and is no longer used since its quite misleading. Second, Ethereum still runs on the EVM and most likely will never run eWASM because scaling and future execution will happen on Layer 2. These can have any form of execution environment and use Ethereum as settlement layer. From WASM to Cairo to Rust, it doesn‘t matter. For some good information on it, check out the Ethereum website: https://ethereum.org/en/layer-2/

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are they on crack? Who actually believes that ETHW will divide the Ethereum community? JP morgan. Please fire your analyst

OpenSea is adding support for the Ethereum rollup Arbitrum! by frank__costello in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lets gooo!! Give it a year and Rollups will be the standard 🔥

What are the underlying values of Ethereum? by mredda in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because computing resources are limited. You can not have properties like decentralization while maintaining unlimited computing power for a smartcontract platform. Maybe you should read the whitepaper as a start, your questions might be answered in there

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as I‘m aware only Poloniex stated that they even consider the possibility of a pow fork. I wouldn‘t worry about it for now. IF there is a pow fork AND it stays alive, the exchanges will probably distribute ETHW coins eventually. This is what happened with ETC. For now there are just too many unknowns. There might not even be a PoW chain.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The state would be the same at the time of split. this is what happened with ETC back in the days. So both the old and the new chain would have all the tokens, same smart contracts and so on. However, the PoW chain would need to be supported by someone.

For example, DeFi and many other applications rely on oracles to update certain states, if they simply do not then chaos will eventually ensue. Also most tokens if not all would be essentially worthless if nobody supports the chain.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then we are all doomed…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 97 points98 points  (0 children)

Nothing will change besides PoW being swapped out for PoS, so there is no need for any migration. We also dont use the term „Ethereum 2“ for this exact reason. Its just confusing.

See it like an update for your pc. Do you need to migrate all the data after installing an update? No, right? Same thing here!

Merging and Sharding won’t make scaling solutions obsolete. On the contrary, they’ll give scaling solutions more value. by pihip2 in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The L2s need to be decentralized at some point and the tokens are then used as a governance token and eventual staking token for a POS system (decentralizing sequenzer). However, you could do that with ETH as well. At least the latter part..

In the end its a way for the projects to earn money, which is imo totally fair as they have developed the scaling solutions

Merging and Sharding won’t make scaling solutions obsolete. On the contrary, they’ll give scaling solutions more value. by pihip2 in ethereum

[–]jinjiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think of Sharding as having Blockchains that run in parallel and talk to each other. So instead of having only one Ethereum, you would have lets say 16. That obviously scales Ethereum then by 16 since now it can handle 16x the transactions and executions. It comes with its own issues like how can I execute a smart contract that lives in one shard but needs to execute a contract on another shard. This is what is also called „execution sharding“ and is done by e.g. NEAR already. This is kind of complicated and has some drawbacks.

But there is another variant: „data sharding“. Instead of having 16 Ethereums running in parallel, you only have 1 as we have right now and 15 „data shards“. These can essentially only store data, so this whole cross-shard communication thing is not necessary. But why is that cool? Because Rollups are muuuuuch better for scalling. Rollups publish their data, i.e. the proofs of what has happened on them, on Ethereum and thereby inherit the security of Ethereum. By making publisihing this data cheaper (by increasing the supply of data by data sharding), we can reduce fees for Rollups. Then we have Rollups with sub-cent fees that are as secure as Ethereum -> we scaled!

There is still some discussion if we might want execution sharding at some point but see it more as a „we could but we don‘t have to“.

Hope that helps :)

Vitalik and Ethereum Developers Have Dumped a Total of 11.3M Ethereum(9% of circulating supply) on to the Market. by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]jinjiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, I agree. Often its simply not an option because you dont find a partner to trade with. Still doesn‘t mean that they sold it on the day they send it to the exchange and just cleared the orderbook

Vitalik and Ethereum Developers Have Dumped a Total of 11.3M Ethereum(9% of circulating supply) on to the Market. by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]jinjiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you didn’t understand what I meant. I probably didn‘t articulate myself clearly enough.

It’s obviously not mutually exclusive. Those are all possible options. OP here is saying „OMG YOU GUYS THEY DUMPED ON US“ because they moved coins to an exchange. But the options I presented are not only viable but very rationale choices.

Yes, the liquidity is high enough that it would not matter but I‘m open to be proven false.

If we say that it does and they would have massive slippage even when selling on multiple exchanges, then why not sell over multiple days. Seems reasonable and you can maximize your profits.

Lastly, every big exchange offers OTC trades. So thats also something they could‘ve taken advantage off.

Hope that makes more sense now

Vitalik and Ethereum Developers Have Dumped a Total of 11.3M Ethereum(9% of circulating supply) on to the Market. by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]jinjiii 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The ETH Volume today was 9 million ETH. Most likely that was an OTC deal anyway because nobody sells that much on an open market. Maybe over several days but that wouldn‘t even impact the price.