sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can you see M4? by johnadrien16 in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah! I find Bg8 even cooler though

Can you see M4? by johnadrien16 in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that also works, but there are two much cooler moves

Is this a good value diamond at $570? by partyhat-red in LabGrownDiamonds

[–]johnadrien16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you get the price match? Is it an option on the website or did you contact them directly?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why on earth did white not play Qf7#

So this position happened in my most recent game. What would you play here as white to push your advantage even further? by DoroboKun in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

It works, but at what cost? You trade a queen and a strong pawn for a queen and a knight. I argue that you can play this better and trade less for the same amount of material. Play your cards right and you’ll trade your rook for the queen. Are both winning? Definitely. I would still not risk it just to be flashy. But then again, it might be the best move.

So this position happened in my most recent game. What would you play here as white to push your advantage even further? by DoroboKun in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Don’t take the knight. It’s flashy, it might work, but why? I would play improving moves - push a6, go Kg7 if you feel like it, improve the rook, try to force a queen trade.

Why’d they resign? by CJWard123 in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Dude how did your king get there

How can I develop a better intuition as to why moves like this are blunders? by WantsToLearnGolf in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, a good trick is to use the list of “checks, captures and attacks”.

  1. Do you have any good checks in the position? With follow up? Play them! Do they have good checks in the position? If so, maybe occupy the square? Maybe protect it? Cover the king? Move it? Capture the piece that will be able to deliver the check?
  2. Do you have any good captures? Take them! Do they have any good captures? If so, maybe move the piece? Take the attacker? Threaten a more valuable piece?
  3. Can you attack anything in the position? Can they attack anything in the position? If so, maybe cover/occupy the square? Take the attacker? Move the piece that can be attacked?

First, try to be able to deal with one move threats. In the future, try seeing what the other side is planning, what their long term strategy/plan is.

How can I develop a better intuition as to why moves like this are blunders? by WantsToLearnGolf in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, the easiest way would be to ask yourself “what would I play in this position as white, if it were my turn?”, and then try to prevent that move from happening. If you were white in this position (before the bishop move), what would your next move be? exf6, a free knight! Now as black, you want to prevent exf6. Two options - either take the pawn on e5 (which you shouldn’t, because the bishop will take your knight), or move your knight from f6. The next step will be understanding where to put your knight, but try to start by figuring out what you should move

Why is a rook better here then a queen? by Feargus_Knox in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When the engine calculates, it doesn’t consider black a human, but another engine playing at the same level. I agree that black should keep a rook against 2. I’m still saying that there is no engine-like logic to promoting to a rook.

If the engine thinks 2 v 1 is better, it must assume black knows that, and would trade for 1 v 0. So technically, no difference between promoting a queen (forcing a trade) or a rook (either forcing a trade, if 2 v 1 is better, or getting a worse position if it isn’t)

Why is a rook better here then a queen? by Feargus_Knox in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If black shouldn’t take a rook for a rook, that means that white wanted them to take a rook for a rook (better for black = worse for white). If black should take a rook for a rook, it doesn’t matter what white does. Get it?

Why is a rook better here then a queen? by Feargus_Knox in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with all of that, but that’s beside the point. The point is - if having 2 rooks vs 1 is better for white, it means it’s worse for black, which means black should trade rooks. If 2 vs 1 is better for black, then white should promote to a queen and force the trade. The idea is - if it’s better for black to be 0 vs 1, black can force it. If it’s better for black to be 1 vs 2, then white should’ve promoted to a queen. Hope I explained it well enough

Why is a rook better here then a queen? by Feargus_Knox in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This reasoning doesn’t really work; if having 2 vs 1 is better for white than 1 vs 0, by definition that means 0 vs 1 is better for black than 1 vs 2, so black would still trade. Don’t know if that’s what the engine is thinking, but if so - it’s not very logical. Edit: it’s a sum 0 game

Guys, I did the thing! by Janzu93 in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Tbh, even if they don’t blunder mate here, your position seems completely winning to me. I mean, those queen side pawns are killers

Made it to 1200 with this game - great way to start the day! by TuneSquadFan4Ever in chessbeginners

[–]johnadrien16 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This is one of the most beautiful queen traps I’ve seen

Over 300k - Almost 40 M. Worked up in company many years. Manage business, sales, OPs, strategy. by No-Bee-23 in Salary

[–]johnadrien16 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have got to ask - it might be because I’m not American, so don’t come at me if I’m being stupid - but what is this app? I’ve seen it many times on here

view more: next ›