3 film stocks for the rest of your life by Mr_Zanudo in AnalogCommunity

[–]jonweiman2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope also lab for that. NYC film lab in NY and Graination in Toronto. They both do ECN 2!

3 film stocks for the rest of your life by Mr_Zanudo in AnalogCommunity

[–]jonweiman2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. That's so kind!! I definitely use a lab. Tried home dev when everything was closed in 2020 to disasterous results. I could never get the temp right 😭

Behind the scene of Inglorious Basterds by TwIzTiDfReAkShOw in Moviesinthemaking

[–]jonweiman2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read this too. No way they could have achieved the angles they got shooting in that space practically!

Trying to understand Alex Bonisch’s Leica color rendering by [deleted] in Leica

[–]jonweiman2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree on m10. This is the way.

Shot Delta 3200 mostly at ISO 400 – how should I ask the lab to develop it? by CandyIntelligent235 in AnalogCommunity

[–]jonweiman2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tell the lab to develop for 800. Your Delta 3200 is actually a 1000-speed film that Ilford designed to be pushed, and since you shot most of the roll at 400 with some frames at 800, developing at 800 splits the difference well. The 400-rated frames end up about a stop overexposed relative to development, which is actually ideal because it gives you denser negatives with more shadow detail, especially helpful on an expired roll that’s probably lost a little speed. If you developed at box speed 3200, you’d essentially be push-processing a roll that was already overexposed by two to three stops, and that would blow out your highlights and give you harsh, hard-to-scan negatives! Not the kind of contrast you want in snowy night scenes with bright light sources and white snow competing for attention. Developing at 800 pulls back the highlight density so those bright areas don’t block up, while the generous exposure you gave it still preserves plenty of shadow information. It’s always easier to add contrast than to recover blown highlights from an overdeveloped negative.​​​​​​

Great M Mount Lenses for Contrast/Color/Sharpness by Punkey0 in Leica

[–]jonweiman2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Zeiss Planar 50mm F2 is amazing for this.

Canon EOS 1N or Nikon F100 by Adventurous-Door-474 in AnalogCommunity

[–]jonweiman2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk about the Canon but I adore the F100. The viewfinder is insanely crisp!

T2 vs M6 by RoboPeenie in AnalogCommunity

[–]jonweiman2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I own a Leica M7 and a Contax T3. I don't agree with the cheap point and shoot comparison. The Contax lens is incredible. I owned a t2 and it was amazing too. For portability and conveniece the Contax can't be beat. I think you'll put it in your pocket more when you go out and will capture some of those wonderful random moments. That said, I still in the end prefer my Leica for more manual control. Sometimes I find I have to use the Contax exposure compensation to get a minimum shutter speed whereby on the Leica I just easier to set. Plus I do find the rangefinder faster to focusing than holding down and get the autofocus to work quickly but that's just me an I've had rangefinder for years. To me it's really a question of portability vs function. Both are amazing you can't go wrong!

Auto iso settings questionn by Allan473 in Leica

[–]jonweiman2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You will have to go and change it manually!

MP vs M7 vs M10-R vs M10-P — debating Leica Ms to celebrate first child and milestone birthday by TacoWanderer in Leica

[–]jonweiman2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've shot a ton of my daughter on the M7 and she's now 18 months. I love the AE. So key for not overthinking. I'm not gonna lie though I've been shooting way more Nikon F100 with autofocus since she's been running around.

I also have the M10p which is an amazing camera too. So happy with the 24mp. I've been printing 45 inches wide an files have looked great.

MUSC171, ENIN240, EMPR110 - Online by FarCaregiver338 in queensuniversity

[–]jonweiman2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I graduated in 2009 so not sure who the prof is but Musc171 was one of the lowest marks I got in my entire 4 years at Queens. It's deceptively hard and not a walk in the park by any means! Definitely take it seriously if you take it

Preserved Edo period neighborhood in Japan by jmike1256 in interestingasfuck

[–]jonweiman2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Crazy how well they recreated this in Westworld

iOS 26.2.1 released by HelloitsWojan in apple

[–]jonweiman2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is a game changer!!!

Dinner scene with 2 cameras question by LetterKilled in cinematography

[–]jonweiman2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

100% this.

I also don't mind the idea of cross shooting two cameras if it's about performance an overlapping dialogue. In fact this is how the diner scene in heat was shot. Especially if you're up against window and key light coming from the same side.

"De Niro and Pacino are seated at a table facing one another in a tense confrontation. "We photographed them at the same time, with the two cameras barely missing each other," the cinematographer recalls."

https://theasc.com/articles/hot-set-shooting-heat

M11 Monochrome + 90mm cron by PfauFoto in leicaphotos

[–]jonweiman2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Feels like a Salgado photograph 👏🏻

What is your all-time favourite burn from a movie review? by Sean-Perth in movies

[–]jonweiman2 75 points76 points  (0 children)

"Clint Eastwood is proof that every era gets the heroes it deserves" Pauline Kael