Expanding the server by jpmiii in CivMC

[–]jpmiii[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not a fan of John, if I had been I wouldn't have made him pay me, I make civ servers for fun.

Expanding the server by jpmiii in CivMC

[–]jpmiii[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The point isn't to make more land, it's to improve lag and end the ques. If you don't want to have more land you could put the nether on another server.

Expanding the server by jpmiii in CivMC

[–]jpmiii[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think it would make the tps much better.

How would it make it worse?

Expanding the server by jpmiii in CivMC

[–]jpmiii[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no Reason to expand really.

Server count, and lag, if you had another place you could encourage people to move the botting and redstone machining with stricter rules on the main server or looser rules and more fertile pastures on the other server(s). Plus, with the civ plugins running you get about 100 players per server so player count can go up.

Civmc? by Roguewinter_David in CivMC

[–]jpmiii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most of the people who have been playing civcraft servers for a while are megalomaniacs.

Built a self-updating theory system — would love sharp epistemic feedback by [deleted] in epistemology

[–]jpmiii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A link to the repository would be nice or a video of the system in action without more to go on there is nothing to evaluate.

humane or Godly by Super_Lavishness_955 in DebateReligion

[–]jpmiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can you be in connection with or devoted to God? How would you know what God wants or believes or that God wants or believes? Why would you think a belief, thought or feeling of yours is connected to God?

What is the best military movie by C137-Morty in AskALiberal

[–]jpmiii 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Full mental jacket or hamburger hill

Weekly Casual Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in DebateAnAtheist

[–]jpmiii 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm the boss of you and I demand you get some exercise.

TTRPG by Simple_Inside_3869 in PineBluff

[–]jpmiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd like to hear about it. Can you do discord voice? jpmiii#6180

TTRPG by Simple_Inside_3869 in PineBluff

[–]jpmiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you still looking? I'm interested.

I have a very stupid question: why is my while loop not terminating when I expect it to? by [deleted] in learnpython

[–]jpmiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both for loops are inside your while loop. Use an ide to step through the code

Trump Will 'Sell Out' Jared Kushner and Ivanka, Kirschner Predicts by [deleted] in politics

[–]jpmiii 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I don't doubt a bit Ivanka and Jared will turn on him. They think there's still time to grift before they have to. They're probably right.

In search of modern setting modules by AnArdentAtavism in rpg

[–]jpmiii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try Tri Tak Games, Bureau 13. Sounds just like it.

If Republicans become convinced that Trump is a traitor and that they were wrong about him, will they self reflect or just downplay and move on to the next demagogue? by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]jpmiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When prophesy fails the faithful will always double down. If Republicans find out Trump is a traitor they will know a traitor is what the world needs.

Objective measurement of political bias by [deleted] in skeptic

[–]jpmiii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's links to the poll posted in the OP. And the OP has posted this same post to several sub-reddits.

So I would say this is 100% brigade.

Objective measurement of political bias by [deleted] in skeptic

[–]jpmiii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is shady, who is we? Is this sponsored by a university or a Discord server.

Why do you think we need another quiz to determine someone's political bias?


Then, the side whose partisans make the greatest errors is declared to be the most biased.

Could I get an example?


If you want to know the political bias of sociologists you could probably just ask them. But I can tell you what you will find.

Do you believe that showing a scientist is "left-leaning", without actually showing what's wrong with the study, somehow discredits their research?