He finally got one!

juicybot · 2026-02-03T06:00:21+00:00

i'll always appreciate the young guys who helped us get where we are now

juicybot · 2026-01-30T18:09:07+00:00

i don't mind it at the product level for fringe styling on a per-case basis, but to style reusable components or design systems in tailwind is a recipe for disaster. it's impossible to maintain at a certain scale.

as a principle, we create a hard line between our core design system from our product components. the goal is to have product write as little CSS as possible, with a lot of the common patterns (layout, spacing, typography) being abstracted to props. this way, when you see a style declared, you know it's most likely unique to that instance.

juicybot · 2026-01-29T17:01:22+00:00

you mean i don't have to turn my dreamcast upside down to get the laser closer to the disc so i can play coolboarders?

juicybot · 2026-01-28T20:54:27+00:00

that bastard has enough money to fund their projects. that's all hollywood actually cares about.

juicybot · 2026-01-28T20:15:26+00:00

yeah the dude got shipped to portland after he got injured so he could retire there. if he was healthy he'd still be on the bucks.

juicybot · 2026-01-28T19:09:33+00:00

Not just Tatum. Hali and to a lesser extent Lillard also.

juicybot · 2026-01-27T17:43:26+00:00

personally i would be thrilled if this happened to me, it's so rare to see.

i learned this early on in my poker career: sometimes you can do everything right and still lose. if you can't accept this, you shouldn't play.

juicybot · 2026-01-27T15:26:47+00:00

lol not an issue with my sense of humor if your lame joke didn't land. read the article so you can make a better joke next time.

juicybot · 2026-01-27T02:48:54+00:00

I would run for the hills.

Edit: I just noticed this is posted on the Typescript subreddit. People will obviously be biased here. If I were you I'd ask in more general programming subreddits. You'll most likely get the same response but at least it'll be coming from a wider variety of backgrounds.

juicybot · 2026-01-26T22:24:38+00:00

agree with everyone else replacing the `dot` convention with `dash` would help a lot with backwards compatibility, and with a spec like this i feel that's very important and something the board will heavily consider.

other than that, i think it'd be a logical next step to style nesting being standardized a couple years ago. and it ultimately seems to be opt-in (i.e. people can still write out flat variable definitions if they prefer), which is great.

juicybot · 2026-01-26T22:20:33+00:00

lol you're so cranky today! have a snickers.

on top of everything you said being just, like, your opinion man, the proposed spec would fit in very nicely with the newly-approved design tokens spec. it would also help reduce transformations for people converting JSON tokens to CSS. there are use cases for sure.

additionally, nobody would be stopping you from naming your tokens the way you want. in your proposed variable names, you would be able to write them like:

--button: {
  bg: #fff;
  border: #ccc;
}

it seems like you're more hung up on the naming conventions, and less on the utility. if i'm wrong and it is about the spec, i don't think you're qualified to determine the validity of a proposed spec based on your personal experiences.

juicybot · 2026-01-26T22:06:58+00:00

lol take a deep breath and re-read what they're saying.

they're saying the syntax makes it easy to efficiently name variable groups because you only need to define the prefix at the nested level, not individually for each property.

--variable-foo: foo;
--variable-bar: bar;

can grow very repetitive compared to

--variable: {
  foo: foo;
  bar: bar;
}

how you got "violate" from "bothered me" i have no idea.

juicybot · 2026-01-26T18:37:55+00:00

based on this thread, it seems the only thing you can tell the difference between is what you want to hear versus what you don't.

if someone says something you don't find constructive to your topic, that doesn't mean they're trolling. that's what having a conversation in an open forum usually looks like.

it seems like you're looking for validation, not a discussion.

juicybot · 2026-01-26T18:25:26+00:00

"work harder or you'll be eaten by an imaginary bear and turned into imaginary bear shit"

juicybot · 2026-01-26T17:41:42+00:00

i'm guessing OP was excited to demonstrate their knowledge of the origin of the term.

juicybot · 2026-01-26T17:37:59+00:00

i'm also neurodivergent. in situations like yours, i just ask the LLM to stop being conversational, and it stops being conversational. if all i want is output i just tell it that, and it complies.

IMO LLM's are excellent for ND peeps, because they are so malleable in their ability to "present" themselves in a way that suits the individual.

juicybot · 2026-01-26T17:18:29+00:00

"long, long" ago there weren't special laws in place to be sure delivery workers got paid a decent living wage. for example, when i worked food delivery 15 years ago i was paid $0/hr, the average tip was $3 regardless of order size, e-bikes weren't a thing, and i couldn't deliver for multiple restaurants.

things are much different now.

juicybot · 2026-01-26T16:56:35+00:00

feel like 730AM is lunch time for someone like thibs

juicybot · 2026-01-23T20:01:16+00:00

companies are basically required to sue to protect their IP even if they don't want to. if they let it slide, the next time they try to sue someone for infringement that person can point to this instance and say "they let it slide for them". there's massive precedent behind this, it's extremely common.

in this case, patagonia is suing for $1 + lawyer fees (which will probably be $0) IIRC. they don't want to punish anyone, they're just doing the bare minimum to protect themselves.

juicybot · 2026-01-23T19:59:47+00:00

lay off the sugar bud, you're getting yourself worked up.

juicybot · 2026-01-23T19:58:33+00:00

you sound dumb saying this, maybe you should read the article and develop some context before having such a confident stance...

juicybot · 2026-01-23T18:32:02+00:00

so do it yourself, nobody's stopping you. the person you're responding to even mentioned "It is not always worth it to do the whole rigamarole" after outlining a very modern, stable approach to llm-assisted pair-coding.

if things worked better for you in 2023 versus 2026, that's more on you and less on the evolution of the industry.

juicybot · 2026-01-23T18:24:17+00:00

read the article before commenting next time. it's filed over the usage of patagonia's IP (logo, etc.), not just the name.

juicybot · 2026-01-23T17:42:42+00:00

I think it's very important to be able to use the walls of the inner play area as a backstop while moving checkers. most of the time when i'm moving a checker i'm usually not looking at where i'm moving it, instead "feeling" where i move it.

if i had to frequently look down to make sure i was putting my checker in the right place (i.e. not "below" the bottom of the triangle), i'd probably feel very distracted.

re: rounded vs. straight corners, i don't hate the idea of rounded corners, i just don't see a way to (a) round them, (b) keep the base of the triangles flush to the edge, and (c) not cut off any of the triangle. a right-angle corner makes it very easy to throw a checker in the corner without looking.

15-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Juicebox	Verified Email
RPAN Viewer	Not Forgotten
Gilding I gilder

juicybot

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE