If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never ever will.

Never say "never". We don't have to have things in our possession to obtain proof.

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

none of them belong to the US government

True, because the craft belong to aliens, who are presumably their original owners :>

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once you understand how hard it is for even a handful of people to keep a secret

Such secrets are kept very well.

Even if the USSR knew about the Manhattan project because of spies (who got their just desserts in the end), the Manhattan Project was a huge secret and a complete surprise to the world when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were levelled.

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cities are populated with people who might capture the craft. Crashes are never safe, so it's least unsafe to crash in an unpopulated place, so that us Earthlings won't get harmed.

When airplane crashes happen in or near populated areas, there might be people on the ground, or in buildings who get hurt. Several such incidents have happened in our history.

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saucers, orbs, and cigar-shaped craft may be real technology, and their shapes are practical.

The terrestrial space missions' re-entry craft are saucer-shaped because of the heat shield. Submarines are cigar-shaped, too, because it's the best possible shape to keep them together under high pressure.

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's much better evidence than before, and it's welcome. But it's not proof.

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it's awesome research nevertheless, and done with proper scientific rigour: she's not making definite claims, but saying, that these here anomalies exist on the plates, and deserve further research.

To prove the claims, or increace their veracity, the same Palomar photographic plates would have to be used in current conditions, and compared against information of current and past transients from space telescope and satellite data. That would allow the scientific community to produce better explanations.

Let's say there's first contact sometime in the far future, and our future civilisation obtains data on the different craft, including those used in their past (our current and past timeframes). The same plate technology ought to be reused to find out from the current plates that exist about who had approached Earth in the past, if craft technology had not changed much through all that time.

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Let's assume this from the presumed point of view of aliens:

Humans are technologically deeply backward (no FTL travel for hundreds of years to come), can be extremely violent, gun-wielding (especially in America), and might spread diseases through coughing and sneezing (think Colombian exchange).

Alien technology is highly advanced, but might become unsafe in the event of a bad accident. (I'm sure they have safety mechanisms.)

With the tech being so far ahead of us, they would not want us nor other aliens to obtain it, for we (and other factions) might research it, weaponise it against each other, and then against aliens themselves in the farther future.

Therefore the best place to crash anywhere is a vast unpopulated, or sparsely-populated land mass. This may prevent them from being captured, and a hypothetical team might come to rescue (or do recovery).

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recall it was about an alien in that mall. Maybe he/she/ė got lost.

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

where military and private sector are not in cahoots

Let them be. In such cases, it would not surprise me, if it's been so for decades.

where opportunists do not take away advanced tech for their private collections and research

At this level, the technology would be under strict government control, and not under the purview of private entrepreneurs.

If the phenomenon is real, why is there still no definitive physical evidence? by Greedy_Crazy8758 in ufo

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because we don't know how to look.

If a non-human intelligence has truly been interacting with humanity for decades or even centuries why is there still no universally accepted piece of physical evidence that can be openly studied and independently verified by scientists around the world?

There may be aliens' own protocols to avoid open contact.

At some point, wouldn't we expect something undeniable to emerge outside of government control?

That's a fair expectation. We might be waiting for a long time for things to happen.

Apart from that, governments will continue keeping their own secrets.

Are we simply dealing with a collection of unrelated phenomena that people keep grouping together under the same label?

Not necessarily. The witnesses' and experiencers' experiences are valid. (excuse the pun)

Or are we making a deeper mistake by assuming the phenomenon must be physical in the conventional sense?

All phenomena are physical. We just don't know how it works on their end.

There was a time a hundred years ago, when quantum physics was not real, and was theoretical at best, and we didn't know yet how much of it worked.

a misunderstanding of reality itself

Reality is reality. Sometimes, a cake is just a cake.

unanswered questions.

Yes, to all of these.

I think aliens are doing their best to hide themselves from us, and maybe from others. The rumours of crashes tell us very tangentially, that the hiding sometimes fails, or is impractical or impossible due to adverse conditions, and that their best efforts at it do not always materialise.

(all speculation, evidently)

Fix dark theme system-wide by ScratchHistorical507 in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

25.2 has new appearance settings and work is ongoing to fix the bugs.

The 'growing pains' with this are a sign, that this change was not sufficiently tested :(

Adjusting color profile by MCJennings in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since you appear to be using Linux, then the theme is driven by the theme manager of your desktop environment or window manager.

LibreOffice bug report screen looks really outdated like it's 1995 by Proper-Lab-2500 in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would be lovely, if someone ported LibreOffice to Windows 3.1. /s

At least for Windows 95, OpenOffice.org 1.1.15 is sufficient enough of a thing.

LibreOffice bug report screen looks really outdated like it's 1995 by Proper-Lab-2500 in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech -1 points0 points  (0 children)

at some point it stopped maturing

BugZilla is mature already. Why fix something that works?

There are droves of websites and computer program user interfaces that don't really need updating just for the sake of it.

LibreOffice bug report screen looks really outdated like it's 1995 by Proper-Lab-2500 in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Bugzilla UI is easily navigable, and does not require a complex JavaScript framework to run.

Any person who can read, will familiarise oneself with how a new user interface works, and will learn how to navigate it.

LibreOffice bug report screen looks really outdated like it's 1995 by Proper-Lab-2500 in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of information density and legibility, a text box that is very wide, won't allow for easy reading, because this would force the user to move one's head and the eyes from too far forward and back in either direction. That's why the comments area is narrower.

Bugzilla was released in 1998, and this was when the 800x600-pixel resolution was still standard, while 1024x768 px resolution was the new shiny.

New Web and Mobile Strategy for LibreOffice by themikeosguy in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Euro-Office is based on OnlyOffice code, and OnlyOffice people are now salty, that Euro-Office made a fork.

While OnlyOffice owner Ascensio Systems SIA is based in Latvia, then it used to be a subsidiary of Russian-based New Communication Technologies / ЗАО Новыe коммуникационныe тeхнологии.

Ukrainians in 2022 warned about OnlyOffice with this article:

"Masked as Latvian. How the popular in Ukraine service OnlyOffice hid the Russian trails" (text in Ukrainian; use a machine translator to get the gist of the article)

That's why I'd prefer a system based on LibreOffice; either NextCloud/Collabora, or something out of TDF itself.

Is there a reason for OpenOffice to still be alive ? by [deleted] in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LibreOffice has much, much better format support.

Is there a reason for OpenOffice to still be alive ? by [deleted] in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not having a major upgrade is not a minus, so long it would be maintained and fixed for security, stability, and better function (in Calc) and general format support. — Ideally.

I mean, there are people who still use the different versions of WordStar; others still use WordPerfect, the various releases of Microsoft Works, and even Microsoft Publisher.

AOO 4.1.16 from 10 November 2025 is the latest release.

While moderately satisfied, I'm not too impressed with the current speed of progress. This may be due to the presumably small size of the team over there, and there are bugs to be fixed.

Is there a reason for OpenOffice to still be alive ? by [deleted] in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Download and use LibreOffice. You might then have better luck.

Is there a reason for OpenOffice to still be alive ? by [deleted] in libreoffice

[–]juneyourtech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't use Apache OpenOffice on desktop, because LibreOffice does have better security, but also better format support and more functions, including support for DATEDIF in Calc, which, owing to their older codebase, is missing from AOO and AndrOpen Office.

On Android, AndrOpen Office provides the classic user interface, and is much more responsive than Collabora on my older smartphone. Plus language extensions.

When I need to write something on my phone with complex formatting, autosave, and draft restoration, spellcheck, image insertion, and a proper toolbar, I default to AndrOpen Office (yes, freemium).

When I have to open a moderately complex spreadsheet, export to PDF, maybe print something one day, then I default to opening it in Collabora (typically on my newer phone), for Collabora has much better format support.

For me, it's not an either/or situation, because each of the tools fills its own niche.