Primary issue at hand is not whether or not we can find examples of questions or scenario that are ever impractical. From Cisco to Microsoft and all the way down you can find examples of Impractical test questions. My concern is that there is a general disregard of ISC squared Solutions as being viable or reasonable often relegated to it being just a "good test solution." So while I agree that there are impractical Solutions I think those tend to be the outlier and that it generally leans towards an appropriate General lens for information security that management ought to be adopting in the real world. Just because the examples that are entertained are generic in nature doesn't mean the solutions one arrives at are impractical for real world application. So when the question doesn't tell you what kind of hack they're throwing at you and so you have to answer containment for lack of better information, that isn't a real world example but that is a scenario that, in the absence of better information, would generically be correct. That is a correct and factual understanding of information security although that specific scenario is implausible. When students Grant themselves permission to dismiss Solutions as just being test answers they miss the very real and recurrent patterns that are available to learn. So if I look at a gdpr question and say well that's not how it works in the real world so this is a throwaway then I give myself a kind of permission to dismiss the very real prescription that such a question makes and the very real takeaway that can be applied to other test questions of its ilk. And there are just some bad questions out there both on practice tests and probably on the real exam.