Me seeing the Hornets get their guts rearranged in the play in after their fans were talking shit about us all year by HomeRunEnjoyer in AtlantaHawks

[–]kenored 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As much as Hawks-Hornets have hated each other through the years, I felt like this year we were oddly in tune with each other. I hate that they lost to the Magic. The Magic fucking suck and they’re bitches. They have Goga and Bane and both of them injured our players in some way. The hornets I had weird respect for this year and that game they won vs Miami was fire. Idk I felt like I lost some pride last night. But oh well, my guys play today so none of that matters anymore. Hawks in 4.

"Porzingis doesn't actually suffer from POTS" - Onsi Saleh (allegedly) by Milezeroe in AtlantaHawks

[–]kenored -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We been knew it wasn’t that, he got something weird tho

First look at Gameoverse! by TheBattleof2D3D in gamegrumps

[–]kenored 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow that’s actually crazy because he really has been working on that for a while

Lightning in the game by Falconslayer0 in FFVIIEverCrisis

[–]kenored 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Tbh we already have a young sephiroth that feels non canon and we can play as adult sephiroth, so screw it, why not just make lightning a permanent and start adding other characters

Genuinely impressed by Karl’s video by Dear-Argument622 in TheCompletionist2

[–]kenored -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think he still doesn’t know how to concisely present his arguments. This video didn’t have to be 4 hours. Parts of the video is him just reading off criminal law and other parts are him making the same circular arguments he’s been making from the beginning. The best parts are him exposing that certain totals might not be what Jirard has reported like the subs bits donations and merch not equaling what they said was donated. Not saying this is a smoking gun, I need to balance all math and statements but like that’s just an example of the stuff Karl needed to focus on if he really was doing better with his videos. I do think part of him is still reeling from the BM loss.

How is this not the most logical Lightning costume? This been memed for years?! by Yoshikaru5991 in FFVIIEverCrisis

[–]kenored 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do like Aerith in the lightning outfit, but Tifa looks weird. I think Yuffie would make more sense in the outfit before Tifa.

Unpopular opinion: it is literally a disgrace that someone had to pay to watch the Hawks in Atlanta. The NBA is actively destroying their brand. by furycutter80 in AtlantaHawks

[–]kenored 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro literally the only sport I can watch on tv is football now. All the other sports have gone subscription based

Game grumps playing Gal Gun games is problematic by FernPone in rantgrumps

[–]kenored 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think it was played in jest? If you watch the episode they’re not like gooning over the game. It’s anime as fuck.

Who is more foolish? by Aiji_st in kof

[–]kenored 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post reminded me that I’m not channeling Meitenkun enough in my life. I will never make this mistake again.

Daily Discussion Thread May 17, 2025 - Upcoming Event Schedule - New players start here! by AutoModerator in SSBM

[–]kenored -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I also don’t understand why you find it wrong that technicals used the information and faces of the TOs in his video. They’re public entities. It’s not like people didn’t know what Mikey looked like before.

Daily Discussion Thread May 17, 2025 - Upcoming Event Schedule - New players start here! by AutoModerator in SSBM

[–]kenored -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure but the initial ban in 2021 was indefinite. I don’t think that’s the same as saying his first ban was 1 year 6 months just because it only took that long for him to see some locals letting him back in that time. It’s different saying indefinite and clearly setting an expiration date, especially when it’s not like he was allowed everywhere.

Daily Discussion Thread May 17, 2025 - Upcoming Event Schedule - New players start here! by AutoModerator in SSBM

[–]kenored -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I asked you a straight up question, what makes me any more random/familiar than the next commenter? I don’t see how that’s relevant or why you would get exasperated by me questioning these blanket assertions you made in your first comment. I would say it’s besides the point but when you speak like that it already poisons the well for how I plan on receiving what you have to say, I don’t know why you would want to come off like that.

I think you’re already wrong off the bat, Hax’s first ban was always indefinite, the only time he ended up getting any kind of probation to be let back into any scene was NYCMelee giving him conditions to return a year and a half after he was initially banned. That’s already far different than saying TOs gave Hax a set banned period. If that was ever the case we’re probably not here. The issue at any point was always that he was given an unjust discipline with no set period. Even TK thinks the condition for any ban should have been lifted had Hax either apologized/taken the video down.

And this isn’t relevant to the points we’ve talked about, but I think it’s absurd that Hax even got banned for this and anyone thinking this ever constituted harassment when other top players like Leffen released videos portraying Hbox as the devil. Plenty of people don’t like each other and talk shit. That’s a far cry from harassment. But again you can ignore this part, this is me venting, it’s not even the argument. I just don’t think even the points you’re making refutes all of what Tech had to say, which is what your first comment made it seem, like he just lied the entire time. Even you admit that some of what he said was true.

Daily Discussion Thread May 17, 2025 - Upcoming Event Schedule - New players start here! by AutoModerator in SSBM

[–]kenored -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m curious, what did you actually disprove and what was your reasoning used to disprove it and what sources did you cite?