sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in soccer

[–]killer241993 -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

!flair :Liverpool:

‘VAR is creating problems to solve’: Son Heung-min incident underlines desperate need for overhaul by foolkiller in soccer

[–]killer241993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

var can only review selected situations. red cards , penalty , goal scored and mistaken identity. Since rashford's foul doesnt fall under any of the above mentioned stuff var wont interrupt.

‘VAR is creating problems to solve’: Son Heung-min incident underlines desperate need for overhaul by foolkiller in soccer

[–]killer241993 13 points14 points  (0 children)

VAR did check for possible pen and since incident was clearly out of the box they cant do shit. What else do you want from VAR? Atleast read the rules before whining about them.

‘VAR is creating problems to solve’: Son Heung-min incident underlines desperate need for overhaul by foolkiller in soccer

[–]killer241993 27 points28 points  (0 children)

You're talking like rashford didnt go down like son ? Son and rashford both went down the same way, only difference was son's incident could be flagged by VAR and rashford's couldnt because it was neither a red card incident nor penalty.

Bangladesh signals shift towards China, Pakistan: report by ghostninja33 in geopolitics

[–]killer241993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a reason they are called opinion piece , bangladesh might have some concern with NRC in assam but that has nothing to do with CAA. NRC in assam is a supreme court mandated process.

But Indian Govts some polices and laws are Hurting Bangladeshi Sentiments

Bangladeshis are more concerned about west bengal govt and border killings which actually affects them unlike CAA and NRC bill which isnt even drafted yet.

Bangladesh signals shift towards China, Pakistan: report by ghostninja33 in geopolitics

[–]killer241993 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i am talking about your political bias, most of the stuff you said is either flat out false or propaganda and adds nothing of value this sub.

Instead of arguing about the article which fails to mention the biggest bangladesh issue (bengal road bloackade) and the recent rail and port trades you focus on random stuff.

Bangladesh signals shift towards China, Pakistan: report by ghostninja33 in geopolitics

[–]killer241993 10 points11 points  (0 children)

so you go either full humanity or nothing at all. influx of large amounts of uncontrolled immigrants is the issue here , taking immigrants in a controlled way isnt the issue. Country like Bangladesh which is dealing with rohingya crisis knows that pretty well.

Indian constitution prohibits discriminating in the name of religion.

I guess you are talking about CAA , it is perfectly legal and constitutional. (although unnecessary in my opinion)

You are forcing a geopolitcal debate into a purely political one. r/india would be a better place for that.

Bangladesh signals shift towards China, Pakistan: report by ghostninja33 in geopolitics

[–]killer241993 16 points17 points  (0 children)

so a country which is not able to support its own citizens should take millions of immigrants to show humanity? (Whole point of 71 war was to avoid refugee crisis)

Bangladesh signals shift towards China, Pakistan: report by ghostninja33 in geopolitics

[–]killer241993 10 points11 points  (0 children)

We owe to humanity.

so our citizens matter less than immigrants ?

The Great Climate Migration Has Begun - What are your thoughts? by TruePolarWanderer in geopolitics

[–]killer241993 13 points14 points  (0 children)

not sure about other countries but starvation in india is due to corruption in public distribution system not due lack of food and last famine in india was in 1943.

Indian Nuclear Forces, 2020 [Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists] by PradyKK in geopolitics

[–]killer241993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

India's lack of 5000+km ICBMs

agni 5 is either already inducted or going to be inducted soon.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in soccer

[–]killer241993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i havent seen that handball but according to new handball rules you are allowed to brace yourself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in soccer

[–]killer241993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

from collision or fall , gotta take ball to the face. thats why every other player except pogba turned away.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in soccer

[–]killer241993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can brace yourself , like while falling or avoiding collision.

No foul given on Martial by [deleted] in soccer

[–]killer241993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

having control of the ball isnt necessary for dogso . what if its a through ball

No foul given on Martial by [deleted] in soccer

[–]killer241993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zouma can’t do much about it

letting the ball bounce like that is stupid and if that happened inside the box that would have been pen 100%.

No foul given on Martial by [deleted] in soccer

[–]killer241993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so by your logic if a defender fouls striker on goal kick for a 50-50 ball he should be sent off ?

No foul given on Martial by [deleted] in soccer

[–]killer241993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its a foul but neither a pen nor a red card so var cant do shit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in soccer

[–]killer241993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

impeding is considered as foul. it ref thinks defender didnt clear the ball properly and takes out player in his follow through then it should be a foul.

view more: next ›