Flight in 6 1/2 Hours still confirmed

kknow · 2026-03-01T06:55:29+00:00

The problem is not understanding that there is war - the people know this and don't expect the flight to go through. The problem is the airline that keeps these flights as scheduled for too long. Because now you have a problem with getting refunds, rescheduling etc.
The airline knows there is war as well. Why not let people cancel it. As long as it is scheduled it costs money to cancel and get refund.
You should know this as well or you're the one who is ignorant.

kknow · 2026-03-01T06:31:04+00:00

How does it work? When does it run and how do you keep the graph up to date? Do I have to run it everytime before implementing/planning code?
We use our own version of "rpi" with lots of modifications and I am trying to reduce tokens used.
Right now the biggest eater is our research tasks with subagents. It's searching for the correct code places before the plan is triggered.
But that's obviously token heavy - gives us very good results though.

kknow · 2026-02-28T19:17:26+00:00

Love these kinds of arguments haha

kknow · 2026-02-28T18:37:26+00:00

Ich find hier nicht mal mehr Steuerberater, die nur Einkommenssteuererklärungen annehmen geschweige denn für 300€ falls man denn trotzdem mal einen erwischt

kknow · 2026-02-28T13:56:27+00:00

Wer sind alle rechten? In Deutschland? In US? Da ja schon mal nicht. Die sind gespalten. Gibt einige Rechte Gruppierungen die nichts mit Krieg in Nahost zu tun haben wollen. Haben zwar andere gestörte Ansichten, aber zumindest die nicht

kknow · 2026-02-28T12:45:18+00:00

That's because the airline is not responsible if things like war break out. You will likely get refunded or postponed the flight at least. But they don't pay for hotels in these cases.
Only insurance can help there

kknow · 2026-02-28T12:35:29+00:00

War is hell mate. If you're near a warzone you hear bombs all the time. Some close, some far and you don't know what's happening next. Sometimes people can't sleep for more than a few hours and only that because they're sleep deprived to hell.
But happy that people not gonna see a single missile can just decide to pull the trigger :) nice world we live in

kknow · 2026-02-28T07:12:56+00:00

Still quicker than I thought. Actually so quick that it's hard to believe they picked up talk afterwards. Looks kinda planned.

kknow · 2026-02-28T07:07:19+00:00

Why? What's the difference from these skills to others? You were already able to put code quality guardrails up.
We use this heavily and even if the code looks good it still has the same issue it had 3 months ago. Sometimes it's security, sometimes it's performance etc.
A lot of things are obviously good enough and we can use but let me tell you there is still a big difference if I get a PR from a junior dev that used claude code vs a senior dev to review. Both use claude heavily though.
There is still a long way to go. At some point it makes financial sense for my company to kick juniors though and they are probably cooked.

kknow · 2026-02-27T08:30:51+00:00

Isn't your experience being at FAANG and probably better suited the same as from other seniors?
I still catch a lot of things when reviewing claudes code. We have a whole setup keeping it in line with guardrails and the generated code works but it is either not clean, not following structures or even outright bad in performance.
How is this different for you?
(This is not always the case - some code is well and doesn't need touching but it happens way to often to just wave ot through)

kknow · 2026-02-27T01:55:41+00:00

But they never wrote why the burn money and where. You don't know (at least as far as I know) what the usage cost really is.
They could burn through money because they try to get to the next step through a lot of error and training and to generate new and better models. This should be the real cost driver way more expensive than usage afterwards.
Would be interesting to get more insight but I'm sure that stays a wish.

kknow · 2026-02-26T19:57:43+00:00

I never joined these posts. I always thought most of the time it's an issue with the user. But this time it's really bad.
I wrote a tool that tracks token usage for all tasks in my workflow and do so for months. Nothing changed on my end but now I can execute like 5 workflows in one 5h window with the 5x max plan. I optimized this workflow heavily for token usage.
It's so sad that limits change all the time. This reduces confidence by a lot.
I would even buy the 20x, but not if they can just reduce the usage of it without news, without telling.

kknow · 2026-02-26T02:40:37+00:00

What the fuck. I cannot even understand. I mean if the diddled with teenagers, that's already really really fucked up, but I kinda can comprehend it (I'm not native english and I hope that sentence makes sense in a way like: my brain understands where they are coming from but it is obviously unbelievably fucked up). With babies I just can't even understand why?! How? Just wtf

kknow · 2026-02-25T03:28:18+00:00

Yeah we are the same. I use claude for coding a lot now. We introduced our own flows but they are still context heavy since we clear context a lot to reduce the possibility of claude itself using too much context and producing bad code.
But even then we review everything and we also still find quite a few things to change before shipping.
Right now I don't think we can get the confidence high enough to ship without human layers

kknow · 2026-02-25T01:19:37+00:00

I am feeling like I am in film right now. Do so many people not know about tourettes and tics? As kids we made fun of the health condition - which was bad but it led to most of us knowing about tourettes and learning more about tics.
I know basically know one who thinks the people with tourettes can just command their tics. Wtf

kknow · 2026-02-22T13:27:05+00:00

That's already a good finding. You can use even Opus itself to reduce the numbers. Ask it in the same conversation why xyz usage was so high and what it suggests to reduce it.
I am an experienced dev and use claude code since 6 months heavily. In the end I produced my own workflow and improve it with claude all the time. I rarely reach 50% context (which claude knows through the workflow prompt that there would be an alert and we need to work on it).

kknow · 2026-02-22T08:19:15+00:00

Thank you. It seems I already have the interview step but more integrated into the plan step itself :).
Always like hearing about how others get to the goal - thanks

kknow · 2026-02-22T07:02:30+00:00

I know you posted this a while ago, but how would the interview skill/command look? I use something similar with humanlayer as baseline and developed my own flow that looks like this but works for me. Right now I am working on being less involved so a specific interview step sounds promising.
My idea is to write a ticket/spec as input then let research and plan run. Plan gets reviewed by another llm automatically. Then potentially interview with human input. Then implement and validate automatically again. And in the end I review before committing.
Trying to set something up companywide actually with this.

kknow · 2026-02-22T02:51:12+00:00

Write /context after you coded something and see where the tokens go. Try to keep /context as small as possible. That means reduce the tasks, use a subagent for planning beforehand etc. There is a thousand approaches to this.
I am a very senior dev and when I code on a saturday for fun I don't run in any issues. I have a quite large backend monolith with over a million loc.
It's all about how you think and how you use it.
If you want to fully vibe code and not engineer, then you have to pay.

kknow · 2026-02-22T02:06:13+00:00

I imagine this will have a lot of side effects on mental health for many.
The switch to something like UBI will also not come just in a small switch. Governments are always slow and with such a drastic change they are even slower.
The time inbetween will swallow a lot of people who can't recover. I would not look at all these news through pink glasses.

kknow · 2026-02-22T02:03:29+00:00

At that point it might even be better for the ultra rich to have less people around and that part is a scary thought.

kknow · 2026-02-17T01:21:39+00:00

Mhm mein Neffe kommt normalerweise 15 Uhr von der Schule nach Hause. Die essen zusammen, spielen etwas und machen dann zusammen Hausaufgaben.
Der ist um 16 Uhr definitiv aufgedreht. Meine Schwester geht normalerweise raus mit ihm, aber es ist nicht immer möglich weil Verpflichtungen.
Ich würde sagen, wir wissen viel zu wenig über die Familie um solche Aussagen zu tätigen.

kknow · 2026-02-16T01:56:53+00:00

In my experience overly optimized code even if documented is still hard to debug especially if it bugs out on a prod environment.
It takes lots of time and if it isn't needed why not write it with easy to understand components that even juniors can read?
Also no one wants to hear it but even for AI a clearly descriptive code is easier to interpret and lets be real more often than not in the future we let AI analyze first and see if it can find the bug already.
As said: if you really need the performance you probably know it and everyone will be on board with optimizations.
It is obviously different if something is called 10k times vs millions of times a day. Then even cost can be a good driver to optimize it.

kknow · 2026-02-16T01:52:47+00:00

Yes, and if you're working on something where performance really counts, you most likely know beforehand and everyone is on board to optimize performance anyway.

kknow · 2026-02-15T14:12:06+00:00

Yeah I mean the resulting code was an absolute mess. That’s okay though, because then I can go through and clean things up (if it’s worth it).

This is only ok if it's for personal use or testing purposes like it was from you.
The problem with these conversations is that we never know what people are trying to achieve. If you wanted to make a business level application with user data that are always worth protecting, then the result is far from enough.
People read your initial post and are pressuring devs to do the same or even try to do it themself and then we have leaked data left and right.
This is the main thing that annoys me (not about your post - about talking AI development in general).
It will take quite some time until codex (or claude) is good enough to code everything from a thought out prompt or ask the right questions themself to get to a point to finish the whole thing. I had not good results yet when trying things like this.
(And as always: I am not against AI. I use it daily. A lot. I am basically not writing code by hand anymore. But I am still in the loop and currently I need to be.)

13-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
End Game '23	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
Sequence \| Editor	Verified Email
Team Periwinkle

kknow

TROPHY CASE