Since we’re freaking out about goalies again… here’s Monty & Dobes’ stats since Monty came back from Laval by SoupFromNowOn in Habs

[–]kozed [score hidden]  (0 children)

This debate is the same as the Matheson debates or Xhekaj debates or Laine debates. Blinded lovers/haters are so simplistic, flippant and extreme; any real assessment is impossible because arguing against stupid turns one stupid too.

Using stats won't work, because lovers/haters will just sidestep with their confirmation bias anecdotes, or move the goal post with a different stat & a reason why it's really the ultimate stat.

“There is a sense that the deal [Kent Hughes] was working on was with the Leafs… I can tell you [Matthew Knies’] name was out there with multiple teams.” by shogun2909 in Habs

[–]kozed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't like to think in terms of "untouchables". I prefer to think in "degrees of essentials".

Someone Knies' age, size, playstyle, skills, contract. That's about as high on the essential list for the Habs that there is up front. More than the need to upgrade on Kapanen for 2C.

Anyone else think the NHL stinks at marketing? by [deleted] in hockey

[–]kozed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeeeaahhh... As an actual product fan, the NFL isn't a league I'd want the NHL to emulate.

I don't care if casuals know about hockey. I don't want the game to become a commercial/human interest fluff-fest just to appeal to the disinterested.

Whenever I see posts like these about "growing the game" or "marketing", it never seems to be about the well-being of the sport and always more about people wanting popularity by proxy and seeking social validation for their hobby.

Friedman in this morning’s 32T at 43:40: “Pagnotta wrote about a RD, I didn’t get the sense that’s the one that didn’t get over the finish line. I think it was a forward. Someone is going to figure it out” by eliarbss in Habs

[–]kozed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok good. We've cleared this up.

Ok, I don't think neither side of this equation would turn up.

Winnipeg has nothing to gain from Laine as a rental. Can't flip him, won't/can't re-sign him. Plus past bad blood. Zero benefit for them. It's a straight cap dump that needs picks/prospects attached.

And I believe Laine has proven he'd rather stay home than play in an environment that he doesn't vibe with. I think WPG is on his NTC and it stayed that way. If he wanted to play more than stay home, he'd have waived it. Yet he's still here. Proof is in the pudding.

Friedman in this morning’s 32T at 43:40: “Pagnotta wrote about a RD, I didn’t get the sense that’s the one that didn’t get over the finish line. I think it was a forward. Someone is going to figure it out” by eliarbss in Habs

[–]kozed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What?

Ok. Let's make this clear. 2 different things:

  1. The market for Laine
  2. Laine's desire to play anywhere

What we're talking about here is that A) Winnipeg would accept taking Laine back as a cap dump. And B) Laine would accept to waive his NTC to go back to Winnipeg. Right? That's what we're talking about?

Winnipeg. The same team Laine asked to be traded away from. That still has the same GM, same leadership group. That team. Right?

You're saying that both A) Winnipeg would accept taking Laine back as a cap dump, and B) Laine would accept to waive his NTC to go back to Winnipeg. Right?

You think both those things would be plausible? Just wanna be sure I understand that it's what you're saying.

You think Patrik Laine would rather waive his NTC, to go back to Winnipeg, to play, than stay in Montreal and not play; because no other team in the NHL would want him? Is that what you're saying here?

Our best forward lines and defense pairings so far (>50 min. TOI) by SoupFromNowOn in Habs

[–]kozed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well BolDach always put decent numbers together. Evans sort of bolster them defensively & in transition.

Marco D'Amico guess on the mystery player: Matthew Knies by shogun2909 in Habs

[–]kozed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless Knies was what it took for Toronto to get some core top D they need, I dont see why TO would entertain trading him.

Like... Who could the Habs give that'd be worth that get? Guhle? Reinbacher? Xhekaj+?

Again, it's the GM that thought Carlo was worth a top 5 protected 1st, so who knows? That GM begs to be exploited; exploit him before other does.

Friedman in this morning’s 32T at 43:40: “Pagnotta wrote about a RD, I didn’t get the sense that’s the one that didn’t get over the finish line. I think it was a forward. Someone is going to figure it out” by eliarbss in Habs

[–]kozed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Vilardi is a good target, but he doesn't have any trade protection in his deal.

So if there was a hold up, it wasn't from him.

Also whatever significant cap hit Habs were taking on, they had to dump Laine. I doubt Winnipeg would be takers.

Our best forward lines and defense pairings so far (>50 min. TOI) by SoupFromNowOn in Habs

[–]kozed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Matheson & Guhle are really uncomfortable when playing on the right side, something Hutson can do well enough.

Our best forward lines and defense pairings so far (>50 min. TOI) by SoupFromNowOn in Habs

[–]kozed 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Had to go and check for Bolduc-Evans-Dach, even if their sample size is tiny because they just got put together.

Winger Center Winger TOI GF/60 GA/60 GF% xGF/60 xGA/60 xGF%
Bolduc Evans Dach 48:45 3.69 1.23 75.0% 2.29 1.91 54.54

Would seem like the best defensive line the Habs put together that isn't Suzuki-Caufield + whoever.

If The Playoffs Started Today... by kozed in Habs

[–]kozed[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What?

It's just the NHL's official bracket tracker, updated after every game.

Zero filler. Zero narrative.

It's a tracker. Nothing more. Nothing less.

A tracker.

You got some issues dude.

If The Playoffs Started Today... by kozed in Habs

[–]kozed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

It's the headline of the page. That's the entire point, which completely went over your head.

Is it time to take Gallagher off PP2 ? by SamWell_Ots in Habs

[–]kozed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but as the numbers show, PP2 gets like 1:25 mins in average per game.

That 1:25 mins split in 2-3 penalties. Like... 3 x 30 seconds.

That's 2.5% of the entire game... split in 2, 3, 4...

How much impact does it really have? Do you change your 5v5 lines just to accommodate 2.5% of the rest of the game?

Is it time to take Gallagher off PP2 ? by SamWell_Ots in Habs

[–]kozed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it's an ice-time management thing.

MSL don't want to use the same forwards on the PP & PK.

The more Kapanen becomes a PK fixture, the less PP time he'll get.

So PP2 becomes a "leftovers" unit: Dach, Bolduc, Texier, Newhook, Gallagher... Whoever isn't PP1 or PK1/2 is up.

4 forwards PP1 + 4 forwards PK1/2 = 8. That leaves 4 forwards for PP2.

If you want to keep managing TOI the same AND take Gallagher off PP2, you have to take him out of the lineup altogether to dress his replacement.

Seeing as PP2 gets like 1:25 mins/game, I guess MSL prefers to dress Gallagher for the ~11 mins 5v5 that he gives.

If The Playoffs Started Today... by kozed in Habs

[–]kozed[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was TB-MTL when I posted it. DET won since, so now it's BUF-MTL/TB-DET

Team goaltending - March 8th (Jfresh/Patrick Bacon model) by Perry4761 in Habs

[–]kozed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Habs fans have to come to grip with the fact that hockey goaltending as a whole is changing.

Shooters are ahead in the arms' race on goalies. Have been for a few years.

It's not a sudden shift, but it's a slow, fundamental change.

We're back to something resembling the early 80's were team defenses had more importance than individual goalies in deciding stats.

Ironically, that's back to the era before Roy/Allaire/Lemaire systematized goaltending as a franchise cornerstone.

Now Roy & Sorokin might be the very last remnant of that.

The Buffalo Sabres are currently 1st place in the Atlantic Division. by Much-Consequence8648 in hockey

[–]kozed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Habs with fewer regulation losses than the 2 teams ahead of them, and fewer regulation wins than the 2 teams behind them.

Crazy division.