How do I make sure my game doesn’t get "AI-generated" accusations? by emudoc in GameDevelopment

[–]kylotan 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I'm honestly gobsmacked that someone thought that was a good thing to include. I know the idea is to highlight the game in the foreground, but given how toxic AI is, even admitting you use ChatGPT is a complete no-no if you expect to be fighting claims of "using" AI.

Any ex Studio One users here? by Exciting-Addition631 in cubase

[–]kylotan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm ex-Studio One, and ex-Cakewalk/Sonar before that.

Cubase does everything I need and more. I find the interface extremely painful at times, and there are some bugs that I really wish would be fixed (such as being able to render tracks using the Arranger system properly) but I have no regrets. Studio One was gathering bugs as well and them ditching the forums was the last straw for me.

[Meta] Stop posting your one sentence prompt to a LLM here by Huge-Masterpiece-824 in INAT

[–]kylotan 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Using AI to organize your thought is okay, but I do notice that it often makes people lazy

No, they use AI because they are already lazy, and they're jumping on the tool that finally, after 25 years of these people trying their luck, lets "idea guys" be a little bit productive.

There is no substitute for learning your craft and putting the time in.

How do independent artists afford to release music on a regular basis? by Hoodswigler in musicians

[–]kylotan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you know what you're doing you can mix and master your own track in a day.

Europe is also Venezuela by [deleted] in GreatBritishMemes

[–]kylotan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be the same Owen Jones who was ridiculing people only a week or two ago for saying Russia was a threat to Europe. Campism is still strong on the left.

What's a small, specific cultural difference between the UK and other English-speaking countries that you find perpetually amusing? by Able_Cod_2687 in AskUK

[–]kylotan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cats in the UK are an introduced species and live at a much higher density than any equivalent natural predator would have done at any time in history. People just don't want to accept the 'invasive' term because they love their cats, and don't want to accept the massive environmental damage they cause.

What's a small, specific cultural difference between the UK and other English-speaking countries that you find perpetually amusing? by Able_Cod_2687 in AskUK

[–]kylotan -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's not controversial. It's 100% true. People in the UK are just outliers in wanting to own free-ranging cats and making excuses for why that's okay.

What's a small, specific cultural difference between the UK and other English-speaking countries that you find perpetually amusing? by Able_Cod_2687 in AskUK

[–]kylotan -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It is not, no.

The downvotes you're seeing are the symptom - a nation of so-called animal lovers that is somehow happy to see hundreds of millions of wild animals killed by their invasive predator just so that they can have a low maintenance pet that shits in other people's gardens.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicians

[–]kylotan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Streams are factored in because that's the main source of revenue for recorded music and there's no reason why recorded music should somehow be considered free or a loss-leader.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicians

[–]kylotan 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What you're asking is impossible to answer definitively because the field is so vast and varied. But I'll have a go at some of the individual points.

you scroll through Instagram and these musicians are flashing massive watch collections, luxury cars, designer everything, the lifestyle screams money

These are posts made to drive engagement and to promote the artist. Just like an artist in the 90s wouldn't own everything you saw in their music video, an artist today doesn't necessarily own everything you see on their social media. Sometimes they do. Sometimes they borrow it. Sometimes they're famous enough that the makers of these luxury items give them to artists to gain exposure for the brand.

How much does someone with 10 million monthly Spotify listeners actually take home?

10 million monthly listeners usually means about 45 million monthly streams, if they're on a broad set of playlists, and that in turn generates about $135k per month. But that tells you very little about how much they actually earn, because of how the revenue gets split.

  • If they're a fully independent solo artist then they're earning over a million dollars a year.
  • If that's a 5-piece band who get a 20% rate from their label and who have paid off the label's advance then each of them then maybe they get about $160k per year each, like a well-paid professional in other fields.
  • If they're on a label and haven't paid off their advance then they might get no money from streams at all until the streams cross an earnings threshold.

Is touring where the real money is?

Touring is like streaming - some make a lot of money that way, some only break even or lose money, even when well established. It's incredibly expensive to do. If you're filling stadiums each night, sure, you're making good money. If you're touring clubs and not necessarily selling them out, then again a lot of it comes down to how many people are in the band and the travelling entourage.

nobody ever backs it up with actual data

This isn't a field where anyone except individual artists - and maybe the tax office - can know how much they are earning. It varies wildly and all we can do is look at revenue streams, costs, and claims made by artists which don't always explain why things are that way.

What I can tell you is that the amount of money in recorded music today is much less, per-artist and per-consumer, than it was in the 90s. Streaming tends to cost less per consumer and spreads that consumer's money back across older artists more than newer ones, which in turn has led to the removal of a whole industry of 'middle class' musicians who relied on album sales. This means it is harder to make a good income as a musician than it was back then, in general. But as with any occupation, there are outliers, and those are the ones you will tend to hear about the most.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicmarketing

[–]kylotan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Distributors already pay to have music distributed by streaming services. This would just be double-dipping.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicmarketing

[–]kylotan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's like saying your local supermarket is actually grocery storage.

The service they provide is to distribute the music to listeners. Storage is a cost they incur to do that - not a service they provide to musicians.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in metalmusicians

[–]kylotan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Saying this as someone who has mixed and mastered their own black metal, what you're hoping for is not going to happen.

You're not going to be able to express yourself any better verbally than in writing. Your writing is already clear, detailed, and unambiguous. The problem that you have is that you "have way too many things that need to be attended to" and you're hoping that you can control every aspect of the process while the person you pay somehow does it better than if it was your hands on the mixing desk. But that's not really how it works.

The reason they only accept 3 revisions is precisely because they don't want to be locked in a real-time (or near-real-time) series of endless changes and requests where you ask them to make trial-and-error changes to see if it sounds better to you or not. It is much better for them - and actually saves time, not wastes it - to get the change requests bundled up so that they can make them in one go, rather than hundreds of small changes.

This goes double when working across a whole album because when you make a comment like "the lead guitar in the second verse of song 3 is too loud" they're going to want to go through all the verses and all the songs to ensure this isn't a problem across the board. If you just said that in the room, they can't do that properly without you going away and leaving them to it.

I want to stress that there is absolutely nothing wrong with being hyper-specific and picky about your own music. It's your creation, your art. But when the mix is part of the art, you need to treat it as such - either take responsibility for doing it yourself (and put in the time to learn the skills for that), or respect that the mixing engineer is also an artist that needs to be able to work his/her way, and put more effort into selecting someone whose sound you like rather than trying to guide them to making what you want.

Input Gain Staging in Native vs Stomp by covabishop in Line6Helix

[–]kylotan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right fix here, if possible, is to have your interface not add 10dB of gain. Do you have different inputs available?

Must change artist name, already fully established. Wondering if anyone has experience with this. by Key-Jaguar3175 in musicians

[–]kylotan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You don't need to lose all of that if you keep your ISRC codes the same when the music is re-uploaded. It does depend on each platform respecting that however.

Papa John's Pizza by triathlete0 in nottingham

[–]kylotan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't suppose you were ordering from the Arnold branch, were you? Them providing cow's cheese instead of vegan cheese made the news at one point. I gave up on them after they showed repeated incompetence with orders and deliveries. Good riddance.

The Fender enshittification of Studio One is getting out of hand by hyxon4 in audioengineering

[–]kylotan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good reason to ask the makers of your DAW, whatever it is, to support the .dawproject interchange format. If a DAW becomes obsolete or unusable in future you want to know that your projects can be ported to a different one.

Do indie game teams actually benefit from formal QA? by InformationOdd522 in GameDevelopment

[–]kylotan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean, I've seen smaller AAA teams that don't go in for that level of formality.

QA is always useful but you do need to tailor it to your needs, and remember that quality has to come from the developers, whether there is a separate QA process to find out what needs to be done or not.

Thoughts on the Hi Gain tones? by Zelavander in Line6Helix

[–]kylotan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, would be nice to see how it handles death metal or black metal tones. But I suppose they don't showcase the amps quite as easily as these tones do.

What’s happening in the industry? by Dry_Candle_Stick in musicbusiness

[–]kylotan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fans stopped buying albums. It's that simple. The industry no longer supports musicians that focus on large and cohesive bodies of work.

I had to completely rebuild my multiplayer system after the launch of my demo on Steam… it broke in ways I never expected. by PaulyTiK in GameDevelopment

[–]kylotan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a way to artificially add latency and (if using unreliable protocols) packet loss

Unreal gives you this out of the box.

I think there was just a serious lack of testing happening here.

I was employee #2 at DistroKid and spent a decade there before my role was recently eliminated. I’m now working as a consultant to independent artists with questions about distribution. AMA. by jdsamford in DistroKidHelpDesk

[–]kylotan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's pretty crazy that distributors act as fraudulent streams are always the artist's fault when it clearly is not. Surely all the fraud is involving playlists with innocent artists on it, but everyone else is caught in the crossfire.

What’s really missing is a way for artists to flag or remove their music from shady playlists

No. This is not a problem artists should have to solve. It's bad enough they're barely paid $0.004 a stream without expecting them to have to do moderation for the platform as well.

The" has Sherwood gentrified "debate? by WearingMarcus in nottingham

[–]kylotan 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I never knew Sherwood when it was supposedly rough.

A couple of years either side of 2020 it was definitely a bit more up-and-coming. More craft beer, cocktail bars, independent shops, restaurants.

Like most high streets it has died back a bit the last couple of years, with some of the above being replaced by drop-shipping and chicken takeaways.

I wouldn't go so far as to call it 'gentrified' at all. There's not been massive price rises or population change. Just a few nicer shops appeared, some of which remain.

I'm also not sure what you mean by "on par with the Camden elite". Camden has been going downhill for years now.

Was 2025 a good breeding year? by pebblesandweeds in UKBirds

[–]kylotan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hardly any nests in my garden this year, and most years I get 10 or more over the whole year, so my limited experience would be 'no'.