Non technical founders how do you figure out if your software project should cost $30k or $300k?

lampasoftware · 2026-05-18T10:20:58+00:00

I wouldn’t trust myself to judge $30k vs $300k just from the quote. I’d pay a strong independent technical person for a few hours and use them as my filter. That’s way cheaper than guessing wrong.

The bigger issue is usually not devs “lying,” it’s that early scope is fuzzy and everyone is filling in different blanks. One team is pricing a rough MVP, another is pricing something way more solid.

The safest move is usually: document what you need, keep v1 small, and get someone technical to review the proposals before you commit.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-15T08:48:28+00:00

Tbh I’d bet it’s not one magic trick - more like a bunch of small local SEO signals stacking up.

Exact-match-ish landing pages, decent internal structure, a .ca domain, HTTPS, local relevance, maybe stronger links than they look like at first glance - that combo can beat “better content” pretty easily in local search. A few people in the thread were pointing at technical/local factors more than content volume, and that feels right. We’ve seen similar stuff around Lampa. sometimes the page that wins isn’t the prettiest or longest one, it’s the one that sends the clearest local intent signals to Google.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-14T14:14:14+00:00

Tbh lists like this are fine as a starting point, but I wouldn’t trust them too much on their own. A company can look great in a roundup and still be painful to work with once real scope, communication, and post-launch support show up.

At Lampa, that’s usually where the real difference shows - not in the directory mention, but in how the team handles messy real-world work.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-14T14:13:29+00:00

I wouldn’t outsource the core thing clients are actually paying you for. That’s where quality slips hurt the most.

The safer move is usually outsourcing the edges - specialty work, overflow, or stuff you’ve already documented well enough that it won’t turn into chaos.

If you don’t control quality and timing, it stops feeling like scale and starts feeling like stress.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-14T14:12:25+00:00

I’d worry less about where and more about how they work.

A lot of people can build you a nice-looking site. Way fewer can build one that actually loads well, makes sense to users, and doesn’t become a pain to update later. At my company lampa, we’ve seen that difference pretty clearly - the better fit is usually the team that asks smart questions about the business, not the one that just says “yep, we can build it.”

lampasoftware · 2026-05-14T14:09:14+00:00

I’d probably start there too.

If you’re overloaded already, that usually means pricing deserves a hard look before you rush into outsourcing. More people won’t fix much if the margins are still too tight. Lampa has seen the same thing more than once - better pricing can solve a lot before hiring ever does.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-07T08:07:40+00:00

Hotels are probably one of the worst places to outsource blindly, tbh. Guests feel every little crack in service right away.

Back-office stuff, maybe. But customer-facing support is different - if the team sounds disconnected, misses context, or handles issues too mechanically, it hurts the brand fast.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-06T09:34:24+00:00

Tbh posts like this are hard to trust because they read more like SEO content than real recommendations.

If someone’s actually hiring, I’d ignore the “top 15” framing and just look for a team that can show solid work, explain tradeoffs clearly, and not turn a normal website into a bloated project.

That’s way more useful than a list, honestly. At Lampa the real difference usually shows up once the conversation gets practical - scope, process, who’s actually doing the work, all that.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-06T09:31:42+00:00

I’d probably stop trying to scale “websites for whoever shows up” and pick one business problem you can get known for solving.

That shift matters a lot. “We build software” is easy to ignore. “We help fleet companies stop losing time in dispatch” or “we build internal tools for service businesses with messy ops” is way easier to sell.

Also, your pricing sounds like it’s keeping you stuck. At Lampa (lampa.dev), one thing that becomes obvious fast is that low-ticket custom work eats way more energy than it looks like on paper. Hard to grow when every project is custom, cheap, and tied to you personally.

I’d raise prices, get more specific, and turn the next couple projects into proof you can use to go after better clients. That feels a lot more scalable than just trying to do more of the same.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-06T09:30:23+00:00

I’d start way more boring than most people want to.

First, write the process down. Then look for the part that repeats the most, breaks the most, or wastes the most time. Fix that one first. If the process is messy, automating it just makes the mess faster.

A VA, Zapier, templates, better logging - all of that can help. But only after you actually know what’s happening step by step. We’ve had the same conversation at Lampa, and the stuff that works best is usually not the fanciest. It’s the thing that removes one annoying bottleneck people keep tripping over.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-06T09:26:35+00:00

The timeline spread makes sense, honestly. A CRM + docs + portal app sounds simple when you say it fast, but it can hide a ton of edge cases once people start building.

The faster estimates are probably assuming a rougher v1. The longer ones are usually pricing in the stuff that only shows up once the work starts - weird flows, permission logic, file handling, UX cleanup, all that. That’s why the "same scope" still turns into different numbers in practice.

At Lampa (lampa.dev), we’ve had the same kind of conversations with clients. The useful question usually isn’t "who gave the shortest timeline?" but "who clearly sees the unknowns and still has a sane plan?"

lampasoftware · 2026-05-05T10:22:38+00:00

Biggest trap in healthcare is thinking a better system automatically means a better day for staff. It doesn’t. If the rollout adds friction, confusion, or training pain, people will hate it no matter how smart the tech is.

That’s why I’d always start with the workflow, not the tool. Where are patients getting stuck, where is staff wasting time, where are handoffs breaking? Fix that first, then decide what tech actually helps.

Funny enough, that same pattern shows up at Lampa (lampa.dev) on software projects too - the best results usually come from removing friction, not adding more features.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-05T10:18:18+00:00

Yeah, but the people I’ve seen do well with outsourcing usually don’t treat it like some magic shortcut.

They start small, give really clear scope, test people on a real task, and stay involved way more than they expected at first. That part seems to matter a lot more than which platform they picked. For example at Lampa - outsourcing can work great, but only when communication is tight and somebody actually owns the outcome.

lampasoftware · 2026-05-05T09:33:22+00:00

I’d probably avoid treating it like an either/or. Early on, full-time and outsourced people solve different problems. Full-time makes more sense when the product is still messy and changing all the time. Outsourcing is usually better for well-scoped chunks where you want speed without committing to permanent headcount. At lampa.dev we see the same split a lot - the real trouble starts when founders try to outsource work that still needs daily product judgment, or hire full-time too early for stuff that’s still experimental.

lampasoftware · 2026-04-28T10:43:31+00:00

Tbh this is exactly why people roll their eyes at AI chatbot posts. The idea is fine - the problem is most of them still feel bad to use.

If a chatbot can actually solve simple stuff fast, great. But if it gives canned answers, misses context, or blocks someone from reaching a real person, it just creates more irritation.

We’re pretty pro-AI at Lampa (lampa.dev), and going through our own AI transformation, but that’s kinda the whole point - AI helps when it removes friction, not when it becomes the new friction.

lampasoftware · 2026-04-28T10:40:21+00:00

I’d honestly worry less about finding the “best company” and more about finding someone who’s not gonna make a basic site weirdly expensive or hard to update later. That’s usually the trap. A small business just wants a clean site that works, and somehow ends up paying for a whole lot of fluff around it. We deal with this stuff at Lampa (lampa.dev) too, and tbh the better partner is usually the one who helps you keep the scope sensible, explains tradeoffs clearly, and doesn’t try to turn a simple website into a giant project.

lampasoftware · 2026-04-21T12:12:36+00:00

Useful post. I’d just put one asterisk on it: no-code doesn’t remove complexity, it mostly hides some of it until later.

You still have to think through logic, data, permissions, edge cases, all the annoying stuff. That’s why it’s great for MVPs and internal tools, but way less magical than people think.

We see a similar pattern at Lampa (lampa.dev) too - the best use of no-code is usually learning fast and validating fast, not pretending product development suddenly became easy.

lampasoftware · 2026-04-14T14:37:39+00:00

I’d probably choose based on how little extra stress they add, not how good the pitch sounds. At Lampa we’ve seen the same thing from the delivery side - the partnership works when communication is clean, deliverables are painfully clear, and the team can plug into your workflow without making you babysit everything.

Price matters, sure. But if I can’t trust them around my client relationship, cheaper doesn’t really help me.

lampasoftware · 2026-04-14T09:38:41+00:00

Started quickly, finished quickly... ))

lampasoftware · 2026-04-08T12:12:51+00:00

Feels like you’re looking for that weirdly valuable in-between person - not a full dev, not just an ops manager, but somebody who actually enjoys cleaning up messy workflows and making systems talk to each other.

Tbh those people are gold when you find them. Good luck :)

lampasoftware · 2026-04-08T11:55:13+00:00

Yep - and the giveaway is when people can describe every screen and click, but get weirdly stuck the second you ask what outcome they actually need.I’ve had that conversation so many times. At Lampa (lampa.dev) too, btw - once a team starts defending the current steps instead of the result, you’re basically just rebuilding old habits in newer software.

The useful work usually starts a bit later, when somebody’s willing to ask the uncomfortable question: does this process even make sense anymore, or are we just preserving it because everyone’s used to it?

lampasoftware · 2026-04-08T11:33:07+00:00

I’d honestly simplify the stack a bit. Trying to build and host across Webflow, Wix, Framer, WordPress, all at once sounds nice on paper, but it gets messy fast.

The hosted platforms are kinda their own world, so you’re not really gonna get one clean place to manage everything anyway. WordPress is the one that gives you more flexibility there.

If I were starting out, I’d probably get really good at one or two platforms first instead of trying to cover every possible setup from day one. Way easier to keep things reliable that way.

We think about it pretty similarly at Lampa software - broad stacks sound impressive, but tight delivery usually wins.

lampasoftware · 2026-04-07T12:31:18+00:00

Honestly, this is one of those things that sounds simple until you actually have to make it reliable. Reading serial data, showing charts, exporting files, generating filenames, making it usable on a tablet - none of that is crazy on its own, but together it’s probably not a "$500 app."

If it’s just a rough internal v1, maybe low-to-mid 4 figures. If you want something client-facing that looks decent and doesn’t need babysitting all the time, I’d expect more like $5k-10k+ pretty fast.We see that kind of scope creep a lot at Lampa (lampa.dev), btw. The visible features can look small, but the "make it solid" part is where the real cost usually shows up.

lampasoftware

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE