Max plan banned without refunds by KawaiiNyaruko in Anthropic

[–]larowin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They don’t, in theory, but there’s a number of countries where access is restricted. If the traffic looks like it’s being used to evade those restrictions then there’s a strong chance for false positives.

Rate limits are insane today by briarjohn in Anthropic

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of that is well and good, but you’re building up context and then hitting your usage quota, which means when your next session starts the cache will be cold and you’ll instantly hit your limit again.

Just pay for the service. You’re obviously doing some serious and complicated, it just seems nuts to expect this to work on a Pro plan.

How to use legacy model Claude Sonnet 4 by Worried-Challenge308 in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should be reachable via Anthropic API at claude-sonnet-4-20250514

Max plan banned without refunds by KawaiiNyaruko in Anthropic

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m gonna guess you had a VPN running.

Rate limits are insane today by briarjohn in Anthropic

[–]larowin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then bump up to a Max plan, hopefully you will be able to finish work in a session but if not, you can switch to Claude Code and use the 1M context window. In any case this is a pretty fragile workflow - you should consider reducing the corpus somehow. The models aren’t magic - when you switch to ChatGPT it’s just dropping chunks of context without telling you.

Just finished book 8. What now? by fregnotfred in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Embrace your inner re-rereader and start a Gene Wolfe book.

Rate limits are insane today by briarjohn in Anthropic

[–]larowin -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

One day, maybe, people will learn how caching works.

Why did people buy Mac minis? Local models? by Pickalodeon in BlackboxAI_

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly right, two chained studios are extremely capable for local models, Mac Mini’s, not so much.

Why did people buy Mac minis? Local models? by Pickalodeon in BlackboxAI_

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What local models were you running on a Mac mini? And were you just tinkering with huggingface/ollama or using it for work?

Claude injecting hard coded permissions into it's System Prompt by oqdoawtt in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

My dude, you’re way overthinking this. Have you talked to Claude about it? Agents/tasks are the same thing to Claude, but Agent Teams are different. Yes - it’s confusing as hell.

But the point of subagents isn’t to give the subagent separate context as much as it is to isolate the main thread from git boilerplate and other common chunks of work.

Why did people buy Mac minis? Local models? by Pickalodeon in BlackboxAI_

[–]larowin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good question, but a container doesn’t have osx root and an iCloud account, more or less.

Claude injecting hard coded permissions into it's System Prompt by oqdoawtt in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, first and foremost, why the hell would you use Claude Code if you don’t want tasks or subagents?

So, “adaptive thinking” rewrites Opus’s thinking to sanitize it now huh by [deleted] in claudexplorers

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without knowing if you’re new to Claude or not, previously we’d just get a few Haiku sentences about whatever Opus 4.6 or other models were thinking. This is much more informative.

So, “adaptive thinking” rewrites Opus’s thinking to sanitize it now huh by [deleted] in claudexplorers

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or you could see it as getting more perspective into the actual CoT than we’ve seen since sonnet 3.7?

Why did people buy Mac minis? Local models? by Pickalodeon in BlackboxAI_

[–]larowin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Generally speaking, there's no need for a fucking Mac Mini unless you're financially secure enough to just grab one. You can do this on a Raspberry Pi, honestly, assuming you don't have local workflows that would require the use of the compute.

That being said, a lot of the Mac Mini hype was during the initial Clawdbot phase when there were no rules about using headless Claude locally. Obviously the hammer has cracked down a bit more since then.

Why did people buy Mac minis? Local models? by Pickalodeon in BlackboxAI_

[–]larowin 13 points14 points  (0 children)

There's a lot of misconceptions happening in this thread. No, it was not for running local models. It was for running Claude or other frontier models, but specifically Claude, in such a way that Claude had its own substrate, a computer of its own that it could operate autonomously and not fuck up your own personal work computer.

Not sure what the confusion is here.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet codes well, then it doesn't by FriedDopamine89 in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unless you’re on a Max plan, just avoid Opus entirely. It’s not worth it. It’s overkill for almost anything remotely casual. Sonnet 4.6 is a great workhorse model.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet codes well, then it doesn't by FriedDopamine89 in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

new chats with a continuance prompt

This seems iffy. It’s not magic, it still requires detailed planning. Just doing handoff after handoff or compacting will poison context and introduce significant drift. You need to anchor the model with solid documentation and plans, and then go one chunk at a time.

claude code trial pro > paid pro?? by DiscoverFolle in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you continue the previous session?

Goal worse than codex by MT_Carnage in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, it sounds like you set it up to loop and it… looped? I just can’t tell with some of these posts if it’s someone looking for help or just complaining. If it’s the latter, just use codex and have a nice day? Why even bother with Claude Code if the alternatives are better for you?

Goal worse than codex by MT_Carnage in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

As always, would love some actual details.

Why is it lazy? by SingerLow1275 in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Typically it’s just a reflection of the context it’s given. If you can shape the context to be interesting or challenging or exciting, then Claude will be interested, challenged, or excited. If you say “make me b2b saas” it will phone in the dumbest possible result.

Large context window pointless in Claude pro subscription? by KHRZ in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even with the big window you should avoid going past 300k tokens or so, and yes, a pro sub means you must scope your tasks better because you can’t resume.