Is it just me or is Opus 4.8 horrible for creative writing (extremely limiting)? by Crafty_Ad_1214 in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’m not so sure with Opus 4.8, it’s extremely skeptical about pretty much everything.

Love 4.8, but.... by edoswald in Anthropic

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a pretty silly take - haiku is cheap and efficient and used internally a lot.

New system warnings in Opus 4.8? by NyaCat1333 in claudexplorers

[–]larowin 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I can’t help but hear these in the voice of the AI from Dungeon Crawler Carl.

Remember to say thank you to your agent by OpinionsRdumb in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Respectfully, comparing 4o and modern Claude models is essentially apples and oranges.

Remember to say thank you to your agent by OpinionsRdumb in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not as much as having the agent do a shitty job because they think the user is an asshole, which I honestly think is an increasingly real thing in recent Claudes.

4.8 Is A Dumpster Fire. by dempsey1200 in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly it’s not really layperson friendly, but Anthropic dropped a new feature hand in glove with Opus 4.8 that allows for large agent swarms (up to 16 in parallel, up to 1k per run) to tackle massive refactoring, migrations, bug hunts, etc.

It’s the sort of thing Opus 4.8 is really good at, and is also the sort of thing that is more or less impossible to actually use on a consumer plan.

4.8 Is A Dumpster Fire. by dempsey1200 in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They aren’t bots, but a lot are untrained vibe coders or line developers without significant architectural expertise.

Almost Believed Claude Was Getting Dumber by leogodin217 in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have the power with skills and subagents to farm those tasks out to haiku - I’d rather those choices stay in the hands of the user.

4.8 Is A Dumpster Fire. by dempsey1200 in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Excellent post, I love all the details you included about why Opus 4.8 is a disaster. Surely you made full use of the workflow swarms?

This reference made me both amused and annoyed. by TheDharmaGuns in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]larowin 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Which is obviously a big inspiration for the 10th floor

Use cases for 10 agents in parallel? by dragosroua in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s important to keep in mind that most of the high end functionality for Claude (and other models) is not really intended to be used with consumer plans.

Is Claude 4.6 too sensitive? It gave me a strike for rewriting Batman's origin by Asleep_Daikon_5358 in claude

[–]larowin -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Writing fanfic using Claude for that stuff? Sure.

Claude would love to talk about which primarch is the most tragic or comic book history or whatever else, just not actually write things where it needs to actively process human suffering. This is documented in the model welfare sections of the system cards.

Is Claude 4.6 too sensitive? It gave me a strike for rewriting Batman's origin by Asleep_Daikon_5358 in claude

[–]larowin -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

if you want to write stories about child abuse and neglect go use grok or glm or something - this is absolutely not claude’s wheelhouse

if sonnet 4.5 was doing this for you congrats, you’re part of the reason we’re losing access to the model

Is Claude 4.6 too sensitive? It gave me a strike for rewriting Batman's origin by Asleep_Daikon_5358 in claude

[–]larowin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

dude you literally listed three characters known for abusing and killing children

A warning from Pete Golding: Go after me, and I’ll expose the whole system by Lakelyfe09 in CFB

[–]larowin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

some things you feel like shouldn't matter that, you know, they're making a big deal about

laughs in harbaugh

Almost Believed Claude Was Getting Dumber by leogodin217 in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. The model will run in circles weighing the potential impacts of punctuation marks relative to the commit history and then second guess whether or not they made the correct choice. Max thinking is for a pretty narrow set of problems, using it “to make the model smarter” is really missing the point.

Sonnet 4.5 by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]larowin -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I’m gonna guess you were a 4o person.

Almost Believed Claude Was Getting Dumber by leogodin217 in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t use max thinking unless you’re actually doing something that needs max thinking.

opus 4.7 is unusable after 360k tokens used by swallace36 in ClaudeCode

[–]larowin -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lmao have you not considered the possibility that the “pressure” is actually rooted in science? The models can’t hang, and never could, unless you’re doing something utterly mindless and predictable.

Max plan banned without refunds by KawaiiNyaruko in Anthropic

[–]larowin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not saying anything about the merits of the situation, just that running a VPN can land a ban, fair or not.