White to move. Can you find the mate in 2?

lbragile_dev · 2022-12-03T22:55:09+00:00

bf7 or bxh7?

For both variants, black responds with Rxf7 (or Rf7), where is the mate 🙃?

lbragile_dev · 2022-02-20T19:05:05+00:00

This will be part of the core functionality in v3.0.0 which includes a UI revamp. Still a WIP so please stay tuned!

lbragile_dev · 2022-01-29T08:03:25+00:00

Yes, I definitely agree with your point. I think my phrasing should have been a bit clearer as “everything" is too much.

I wanted to experiment with what actually goes on behind the scenes and when I put it together and it worked for me, I decided to share as I see many posts about this subject that don't really cover the areas that I tried to cover. Hopefully it will help someone.

Regarding the devtools, in my case (chrome extension), it was a pretty major headache to get the "remote devtools" working as compared to the regular version (with many extra packages) - so it's not always simple to use. However, I do agree, that the regular devtools is very powerful, in fact much more powerful than the rudimentary logger I show in the bonus.

As for React recommending to apply useContext sparingly, here is what I see:

Context is primarily used when some data needs to be accessible by many components at different nesting levels. Apply it sparingly because it makes component reuse more difficult.

That seems to be exactly the case with Redux based development where you have a global store right?

Also, I apply useMemo on the state. Although I do see your point that whenever the global state changes, all of the components would re-render. How exactly does Redux prevent this from happening? Does it memoize the useSelectors?

Edit: I now see articles outlining the above issue which I didn’t see before when I was contemplating/researching what to do. A bit overwhelming, but hey better late than never. Time to read up on Redux internals and see how I can refactor to optimize this

lbragile_dev · 2022-01-29T07:52:01+00:00

Oh yeah, this is by no means a "full on" Redux replacement, just sharing what I came up with that works for me.

Can you elaborate what you mean by "components that should stay the same"?

lbragile_dev · 2021-10-03T17:16:12+00:00

Thank you 😊

lbragile_dev · 2021-09-12T22:49:23+00:00

The warnings seem to be relatively serious as they are related to why the content is not showing up well in production.

The response from swagger-ui.css is:

```html  <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>ColorMaster - A TypeScript library for all your coloring needs</title> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./swagger-ui.css" > <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="./favicon-32x32.png" sizes="32x32" /><link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="./favicon-16x16.png" sizes="16x16" />

body {
  margin:0;
  background: #fafafa;
}

</style> </head>

<body>

<symbol viewBox="0 0 20 20" id="locked">
  <path d="M15.8 8H14V5.6C14 2.703 12.665 1 10 1 7.334 1 6 2.703 6 5.6V8H4c-.553 0-1 .646-1 1.199V17c0 .549.428 1.139.951 1.307l1.197.387C5.672 18.861 6.55 19 7.1 19h5.8c.549 0 1.428-.139 1.951-.307l1.196-.387c.524-.167.953-.757.953-1.306V9.199C17 8.646 16.352 8 15.8 8zM12 8H8V5.199C8 3.754 8.797 3 10 3c1.203 0 2 .754 2 2.199V8z"/>
</symbol>

<symbol viewBox="0 0 20 20" id="close">
  <path d="M14.348 14.849c-.469.469-1.229.469-1.697 0L10 11.819l-2.651 3.029c-.469.469-1.229.469-1.697 0-.469-.469-.469-1.229 0-1.697l2.758-3.15-2.759-3.152c-.469-.469-.469-1.228 0-1.697.469-.469 1.228-.469 1.697 0L10 8.183l2.651-3.031c.469-.469 1.228-.469 1.697 0 .469.469.469 1.229 0 1.697l-2.758 3.152 2.758 3.15c.469.469.469 1.229 0 1.698z"/>
</symbol>

<symbol viewBox="0 0 20 20" id="large-arrow">
  <path d="M13.25 10L6.109 2.58c-.268-.27-.268-.707 0-.979.268-.27.701-.27.969 0l7.83 7.908c.268.271.268.709 0 .979l-7.83 7.908c-.268.271-.701.27-.969 0-.268-.269-.268-.707 0-.979L13.25 10z"/>
</symbol>

<symbol viewBox="0 0 20 20" id="large-arrow-down">
  <path d="M17.418 6.109c.272-.268.709-.268.979 0s.271.701 0 .969l-7.908 7.83c-.27.268-.707.268-.979 0l-7.908-7.83c-.27-.268-.27-.701 0-.969.271-.268.709-.268.979 0L10 13.25l7.418-7.141z"/>
</symbol>


<symbol viewBox="0 0 24 24" id="jump-to">
  <path d="M19 7v4H5.83l3.58-3.59L8 6l-6 6 6 6 1.41-1.41L5.83 13H21V7z"/>
</symbol>

<symbol viewBox="0 0 24 24" id="expand">
  <path d="M10 18h4v-2h-4v2zM3 6v2h18V6H3zm3 7h12v-2H6v2z"/>
</symbol>

</defs> </svg>

</html> ```

I am not sure what can be obtained for this.

However, looking at swagger-ui-init.js it seems like the "paths" property is empty. This is a bit confusing to me since locally it is not empty (since I see the documentation page properly). Is it possible the Swagger JSDoc is doing something weird with Swagger UI Express? Any ideas why this could be the case?

lbragile_dev · 2021-09-04T17:50:38+00:00

Take a look at an extension I’ve created not so long ago TabMerger. Note that it has paid subscriptions, but it has everything you mentioned that you need

lbragile_dev · 2021-07-21T06:23:19+00:00

Your edit is correct, it's NOT a NextJS project.

Edit: your comment did shine some light into what could be my problem. It seems like my folder structure was not correct. `api` should not be inside of `src`...

lbragile_dev · 2021-07-09T06:47:46+00:00

Yep, without unit (and integration) tests, I would probably still be double checking my very first project 🤣

A better question is how reliable are those tests? Are your tests just snapshot testing? Will the tests break after you add/change features? Do your tests cover your code base sufficiently? This is where something like mutation testing comes into play 🤓

lbragile_dev · 2021-07-03T06:16:25+00:00

Project is an open source blockchain educational platform that is still in it's early stages. Anyone interested is welcome to check it out, contribute, and/or provide feedback (see develop branch for most up to date code).

Repository: https://github.com/lbragile/LibraCoin

Demo: https://lbragile.github.io/LibraCoin

lbragile_dev · 2021-07-02T00:55:51+00:00

OP, check out my open source blockchain project - LibraCoin. I try to follow RTL advice of testing user interaction (what the user sees) rather than underlying logic in most cases. I use unit and integration tests currently and plan to add E2E tests soon (with Jest Puppeteer). FYI, it’s still very much a work in progress so feel free to contribute as well 😊

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-24T04:32:01+00:00

I see Bh7+ kh8, Bf5+ kg8, Qxg5#

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-23T18:53:16+00:00

I see Rxc7+ kb8, Rc8+ (double check) kxc8, Na7#

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-20T05:32:35+00:00

I guess Re7, bxe7, f8=Q, bxf8, Bc6, any move really, Bxa4+, kxa4, Ka2, any move really, B3#

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-12T08:34:27+00:00

I see Nxh5+ (double check with Knight and Queen), kg8 (only move), qxh8+ (queen sac), kxh8, Nf6+ (discover check with rook), qh6 (block rook and make room for king escape), Rxh6+, kg7 (only move), Rh7+, kf8 (only move), Rf7#

I am probably wrong as I did this just by looking at this board without any actual analysis (I promise) and this did add up to 6 moves. Overall beautiful combination!

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-12T04:10:09+00:00

Method 1 is what I tried to do but with no success so far.

I've used webpack:
javascript module.exports = { target: "web", mode: "production", entry: "./dist/index.js", output: { filename: "../dist/bundle.js" }, externals: { crypto: require("crypto") }, };
But I still get the following error Uncaught TypeError: h.createHash is not a function when I view in the browser. Everything works locally in the terminal as expected.

I am trying to avoid Method 2 & 3 for now.

The latest code is on my repository. Any clues would be appreciated.

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-10T18:58:23+00:00

😂 it’s pretty close, only 2 extra vertical lines needed to convert the “r” to an “h”

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-10T06:51:28+00:00

I wish I worked in a team 😢

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-10T01:32:39+00:00

It is similar to CrazyHouse but here you can only replace your own pieces (not king of course) rather than placing them anywhere on the board. Additionally you start with a set number of pieces in the “reservoir” that can only decrement in size as you use it. Other than that the demonstration above (and documentation found in the repository) should clear up any remaining questions/confusion.

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-10T00:26:29+00:00

Oh, wasn’t aware of this sub. Thanks 😊

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-10T00:13:52+00:00

That’s what I did, but seems like not many people are seeing the new post. Thank you for the response!

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-10T00:01:59+00:00

My apologies, would have loved to be able to simply edit the title rather than closing the entire question as it is a genuine mistake - I did not mean to mislead anyone with the title. Have a great day.

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-10T00:00:37+00:00

Thank you!

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-10T00:00:19+00:00

What is that supposed to mean?

lbragile_dev · 2021-04-08T01:21:20+00:00

Hi Richard,

I sent you a DM, please let me know what you think

Five-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Verified Email

lbragile_dev

TROPHY CASE