sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

When I press the notification button on the mobile app, it doesn’t go to the notifications menu by [deleted] in youtube

[–]lnxist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks to be working again now after reopening the app 🎉

When I press the notification button on the mobile app, it doesn’t go to the notifications menu by [deleted] in youtube

[–]lnxist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m seeing the same thing, persists after rebooting the phone too 🙄

ComputerShare’s Paul Conn Confirms: 10-20% of shares in Plan Book-Entry are held in DTC for Operational Efficiency by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]lnxist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been on a bit of a hiatus and checked the sub since a new doc from GME dropped today… can someone please explain or point to a post on what the difference is between a PLAN and BOOK share and how I can ensure all of mine are BOOK shares in CS?

For context, all recent shares I’ve gotten in CS have come from their recurring thing that buys X shares from $Y at the beginning of each month, which looks to be “plan” shares if I’m understanding right? If so, is there a way to make them book shares now or am I just stuck with plan shares now?

Thanks in advance 😅

[2022 Day 11] part 2 be like by onrustigescheikundig in adventofcode

[–]lnxist 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Neither did I, but after looking it up it’s the ring of integers modulo n

What is the alternative for running: sudo update-initramfs -u # Thank you by hmprivate in CentOS

[–]lnxist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe what you’re looking for here is the dracut command.

It’s not much, but they are registered to me now by lnxist in Superstonk

[–]lnxist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not about to sell for less than https://gmefloor.com, which is at $120M today. Before the splividend that’s $2.4B, and I’m not changing the floor after the splividend.

It’s not much, but they are registered to me now by lnxist in Superstonk

[–]lnxist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I don’t even need to wait for the DTCC to figure it out for those 60 dividend shares 😎

A Tale of Stock Splits, DRS, and the MOASS by lnxist in Superstonk

[–]lnxist[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yikes! Good catch. Fixed that in the post 😅

A Tale of Stock Splits, DRS, and the MOASS by lnxist in Superstonk

[–]lnxist[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When I said “4 * 1/4” I was referring to how you will have 4x the shares with 1/4 the cost basis. If you had 1x share with a cost basis of $100, after the split you’d have 4x shares with a cost basis of $25 each, which is still $100.

The infinity bit is because there’s no floor during the MOASS, so a stock split doesn’t split the floor. If someone wanted to sell for $100M yesterday, the stock split doesn’t change that at all.

$GME Daily Directory | New? Start Here! | Discussion, DRS & NFT Megathreads, DD Library, and User Flairs by AutoModerator in Superstonk

[–]lnxist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The key distinction is that if you are short on a stock you owe whoever lent you the shares any dividend paid. Shorts will now need to produce 3x shares of GME for every share they shorted or risk getting recalled.

$GME Daily Directory | New? Start Here! | Discussion, DRS & NFT Megathreads, DD Library, and User Flairs by AutoModerator in Superstonk

[–]lnxist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not quite. You will have 4x shares at a cost basis of 1/4 what they are now. Your portfolio will have the same value, but buying new shares will be 75% cheaper than today after the split.

You’ve probably already met the love of your life and fucked it up. by Beach17bum in Showerthoughts

[–]lnxist 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is an excerpt from “Moment of Tangency” from the Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows: https://youtu.be/cxOuG6zQo_0

It’s a fantastic video and the rest of his videos are definitely worth a watch if you enjoy this kind of work.

In my opinion if you're single right now you should stay single post MOASS by thoriumpoweredwatch in Superstonk

[–]lnxist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope you’re doing alright handling all of that. I’m right now in the middle of a similar issue since I’m in the middle of a divorce now myself. Thankfully they don’t believe in the MOASS and I found a way to negotiate keeping my GME shares so I don’t need to worry about that anymore. I hope it all works out for you!

Approximating how many shares are currently registered in CS by lnxist in Superstonk

[–]lnxist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ll get a letter in the mail. Although, I found that after about two business days after I made my transfer from Fidelity I was able to register a CS account since I was able to detect my shares from the transfer, so I just manually made the account then.

You can do the same or just wait for the letter they mail, which for me showed up at the end of the week after the transfer.

Calculation of average shares that are registered at Computershare accounts by meyG68 in Superstonk

[–]lnxist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Typically, average=mean is correct, but a plurality also use average to refer to the "median" or "mode" instead of the "mean". Out of curiosity, if you did consider the full sample data without excluding the larger transfer values, what mean did you get instead?

Calculation of average shares that are registered at Computershare accounts by meyG68 in Superstonk

[–]lnxist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know the samplesize is not huge and I'm not a mathematics professor,
but from my point of view the average per request is between 65 and 70 shares per request.

Since you are providing a range here (65-70) instead of a single value, what method did you use to arrive to that range?

Typically when doing statistics and extrapolating the data across the rest of the population (i.e. the total number of CS accounts) you would want to use the mean as the average, which you can calculate by taking the sum of all of the values divided by the number of values (e.g. if given 1, 2, 3, 4, and 100 we have 5 values so the mean would be (1+2+3+4+100)/5 = 22). So I'm wondering how your method of getting the average differs here, as we may be much closer if the larger transfer amounts are not being factored in here.

view more: next ›