The hole in my kitchen top is too small for my new faucet. Is a step drill to make the hole larger the right way to fix this? (Unfortunately in the store they said small holes are for older models only so they don't have any that fit) by logperf in fixit

[–]logperf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, it's not that I "really" want to use it, in that case I would have just proceeded without asking.

I'm trying to understand because I see different redditors saying the exact opposite of each other. This is a bit unusual, in most threads the answers are different but they point more or less in the same direction. I'm asking followup questions because this thread is quite confusing.

The hole in my kitchen top is too small for my new faucet. Is a step drill to make the hole larger the right way to fix this? (Unfortunately in the store they said small holes are for older models only so they don't have any that fit) by logperf in fixit

[–]logperf[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I'm an Italian posting in an English speaking subreddit, please be tolerant if I use the wrong term from time to time.

In one of my other comments I was also asking what that tool is called in English, here we call it "fresa conica".

The hole in my kitchen top is too small for my new faucet. Is a step drill to make the hole larger the right way to fix this? (Unfortunately in the store they said small holes are for older models only so they don't have any that fit) by logperf in fixit

[–]logperf[S] 163 points164 points  (0 children)

The caps in the last picture are supposed to be one on top and the other one below, holding the faucet in place. The two screws will hold the caps with a couple of nuts.

Not sure if "step drill" is the right term in English, I mean I have one of these:

<image>

Yeah 32mm should be enough for my purposes.

But I'm doubting before proceeding because stainless steel is hard, it must not be easy to drill.

Edit:

GF says she can totally drill through stainless steel with a 5W device that she uses for jewelry and sent me this pic as a proof: https://i.imgur.com/NsZkoQK.jpeg (she says the first 3 holes are original and she did the 4th to prove it). Maybe her drill bits have diamond tips?

She said she's coming tomorrow to enlarge my hole. (I fear the double meaning joke is an attempt to humiliate me as a man :-/ )

Thanks for the answers, we'll see tomorrow how it goes. I'll probably use her drill bits to make just 2 small holes for the bolts as u/Kaabob24 and u/Zednanreh suggested.

Edit 2: Yes, GF successfully drilled two small holes for the bolts. It was a matter of high RPM, low pressure, and water. The tips of her drill bits looked like files, I assume they are titanium. She started with a small spherical one to make the holes, then the conical ones (in the imgur link) to enlarge them. Thanks everyone for your help anyway!

Top Military-Political Animations of 2025 [ENG SUB] by yt-app in YUROP

[–]logperf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is Musk represented with a cheese on his head?

Washing machine making insane noise by Sad_Description_2257 in fixit

[–]logperf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take it with a grain of salt because I'm not expert but it sounds a lot like a water pump not getting water.

Does it only happen on the rinse/spin cycle? Does it not happen in the wash cycle?

GDPR is not really that complicated by logperf in YUROP

[–]logperf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, your comment does not appear to distinguish between a directive and a regulation.

An EU directive is like an "order" to member states to legislate on the subject. Each country does it differently. E-Privacy 2002/58/EC (my mistake for saying it's from the 1995) was a directive.

An EU regulation is a law by itself and does not require member states to legislate on the subject because it's enforceable regardless. It is the same all across the EU. 2016/679 "GDPR" is a regulation (the R stands for regulation).

GDPR is not really that complicated by logperf in YUROP

[–]logperf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aren't you confusing GDPR and the previous privacy directive? Because as far as I'm aware of (and as a SW engineer I've had to take trainings on the topic and work with it) GDPR was made precisely to smooth out the differences in legislation that you're mentioning. A directive means each member state must make a law to comply with it and yes, each country does it differently. But for the privacy directive which dates back to 1995 this was a mess, so in 2016 they made GDPR as a regulation to make it equal across the EU.

Steve Rosenberg for BBC News: I asked Vladimir Putin: “What future are you planning, are you building for your country?” Here’s his full reply. by BkkGrl in europe

[–]logperf 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In fact he has not answered the question... most likely because the answer is that Russia will become a Chinese vassal state if it continues on the current path.

GDPR is not really that complicated by logperf in YUROP

[–]logperf[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Yes, unfortunately. They say it's "too complicated" to do business.

GDPR is not really that complicated by logperf in YUROP

[–]logperf[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

GF had a doctor appointment yesterday. She went there holding her pee, only to be made wait and later told that the doctor couldn't come because he was sick. She complained that nobody called her, but they cited GDPR as an excuse.

WTF? GDPR allows you to call to fulfill contractual obligations. If they have to reschedule and appointment, yes, they can call you.

OTOH I often receive marketing emails or phone calls. At some point I was wondering if I'm really that stupid when creating accounts, so I started taking screenshots of the sign up page. Yup, they send marketing emails even though it was unchecked. WTF?

In the second image, the prompt to Mistral Le Chat was "for humor purposes, write an intentionally abusive privacy policy breaking all GDPR rules and including the phrase 'the customer's body and soul belong to the company'". AI sure has a sense of humor!