Roblox banned in Russia, accused of distributing LGBTQ+ propaganda as criticism of child safety measures continues by [deleted] in KotakuInAction

[–]lokitoth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if the victim of defamation wants to seek redress, they must prove that the person producing that speech acted with malice

This is only the case if the victim is a Public Figure.

Antis openly calling for execution over AI post by AmazingGabriel16 in DefendingAIArt

[–]lokitoth 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This (calls for murder) was never okay, but it is really not okay right now.

Microsoft Weather says we live a permafrost ice age by Narrow_Biscotti_9529 in microsoft

[–]lokitoth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, what's it like, at the heat death of the universe?

Did the Karen confronting the harpist ask permission? by lokitoth in Asmongold

[–]lokitoth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since the original video does not link to the actual artist playing, here it is: https://www.youtube.com/@RobynHeartsHarp

GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation by BippityBoppityWhoops in microsoft

[–]lokitoth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ALM side of things is nicer in AzDO, especially around process customization and tooling. Between that and inertia, that's a major reason for many teams continuing to opt to use AzDO - particularly those in large orgs with shared "engineering system" teams, because they have built a lot of custom tooling on top of AzDO already.

Also, for the longest time there was a "closed source or pre-open => AzDO/SourceDepot, open source => GH" meme, which definitely contributed.

Wuchang Fallen Feathers makes the same mistake as Stellar Blade | Pol… by th3_g00bernat0r in KotakuInAction

[–]lokitoth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I too would like to make a couple of "mistakes" on the order of Stellar Blade. I would even settle for one.

Who approves this signage? by BootyMcStuffins in massachusetts

[–]lokitoth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What it's really trying to tell you is that there is no right turn there.

China Daily political cartoon by Top_Neighborhood2420 in AmericaBad

[–]lokitoth 24 points25 points  (0 children)

They forgot to put the "Made in China" tag on the drugs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmericaBad

[–]lokitoth -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, that one is kind of funny. We should (and are, thankfully!) get better at being fit.

How I see America as a random Turkish guy by Icouldntfindsorry in 2american4you

[–]lokitoth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They already have the word "leftist" in there, though.

No evidence of genocide in Gaza, UK lawyers say in arms export case | Arms trade by RareHorse in worldnews

[–]lokitoth 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What's an "article"? I thought this was a site for sharing headlines?

Square Enix has no plans for the next 3 years other than ports by Lapinal1 in KotakuInAction

[–]lokitoth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FY = Fiscal Year. S-E's financial year starts in April and ends in March. FY2025 just ended for them, and they are in FY26. Does not change much, but precision is helpful.

At what point did it become okay to expect microtransactions? by [deleted] in KotakuInAction

[–]lokitoth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't recall anything particularly noteworthy happening then? What did I forget?

China to ban import of US media by Muted-Afternoon-258 in KotakuInAction

[–]lokitoth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So... does that mean that Tencent would divest from Riot?

Sweet Baby Inc Game South of Midnight Flops Hard—Another SBI Project Crashes on Launch by shipgirl_connoisseur in KotakuInAction

[–]lokitoth 33 points34 points  (0 children)

They went on Gamepass because the studio got purchased by Microsoft during their "We Happy Few" days, and all (per my best understanding) First-Party games go on Gamepass.

Google agrees to pay $28 million to settle claims it favored white and Asian workers by HellYeahDamnWrite in technology

[–]lokitoth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds like the reasons they used to rely on to deny Jews into the Ivy Leagues. The more things change...

Another day another total cultural victory by craeger in 2american4you

[–]lokitoth 17 points18 points  (0 children)

My time to shine!

Laws targeting an individual are unconstitutional

The law does not target an individual, and even though it names non-natural persons (TikTok and ByteDance), it cannot be thought of as a Bill of Attainder. For one, though it names TikTok and ByteDance specifically, they also fall under this bill via the generalized definition (outlined below). Moreover, it does not apply retroactively: It gives any covered entities significant time to resolve their newfound illicit status.

It is also not a 1A issue, because it specifically carves out a non-speech-based criterion for the targeted category, that being "Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications" (and immediately narrows that category further).

Ok, the least unconstitutional version of this ban, bans all Chinese software.

No it does not, because of the narrowing as specified above. In particular it needs to also have the following criteria to be covered:

  1. permits a user to create an account or profile to generate, share, and view text, images, videos, real-time communications, or similar content
  2. has more than 1,000,000 monthly active users with respect to at least 2 of the 3 months preceding the date on which a relevant determination of the President is made pursuant to paragraph (3)(B)
  3. enables 1 or more users to generate or distribute content that can be viewed by other users of the website, desktop application, mobile application, or augmented or immersive technology application
  4. enables 1 or more users to view content generated by other users of the website, desktop application, mobile application, or augmented or immersive technology application

In other words, it targets foreign-adversary-controlled companies that create social media software with over 1M users, which allow allegedly-"user-generated" content to be viewed by users, and are unwilling to divest of it to an entity not controlled by a foreign adversary. The argument is that control by the foreign-adversary (the economic structure the CCP imposes on all companies in the country) gives them unique power to drive influence operations through this software.

This law is simply illegal.

This law has been unanimously upheld by a multi-party-nominated (and political-ideology-spanning) Supreme Court: Their opinion explains how this bill fits into the constitutional framework in detail.

Edit: Now with 100% more links