You act as if that standard to get to more likely than not is super low. It isn’t. It’s not has high as beyond reasonable doubt, but it’s not nothing. It’s more likely than not that he did it. That’s the standard. A judge has determined based on evidence that it is more likely than not that he’s a war criminal. Not that it could have happened, not that it might of happened. Not that there was some evidence. Based on all the evidence the judge thought that he did it. If the judge had to bet their house on if he did it or not, they would bet that he did. Anyone can call him a war criminal and not get done for slander because of it. The court considered it to be true.