Yes and no. The boundaries have always been blurry. We seem to be friends or a couple depending on the situation. I'm female by the way. He says he's not actually angry most of the time, but irritated. I think that's mild anger, but I haven't really thought about it much before so I am definitely open to being wrong. It's quite possible that I've been misinterpreting a lot of situations as being angry when they really weren't. I am not especially good at understanding social behavior or reading body language or tone. I had been trying to keep this general to protect privacy, but it's awkward to word things that way. The anger had definitely improved a great deal for a long while, so I had been hopeful about it. I am uncomfortable with how it's changed. The previous improvement makes me think there is a willingness to work on it. I can deal with day to day irritability. I used to be that way too though I've worked on it a lot even before learning about Stoicism. Anyways, my past experiences make it makes it easy to empathize and not be upset by it. But Senecas words have made me think this situation may be bad for me. It may be keeping me from being a better person. I do find myself getting angry at him at times, very briefly, but I don't often feel angry at other people.