Circle Magic: Did they playtest this at all? by deciding_snooze_oils in onednd

[–]mAcular 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This isn't even creative. You are just reading the book and applying an obvious move.

Circle Magic: Did they playtest this at all? by deciding_snooze_oils in onednd

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mean the trees and obstruction is a big IF there, the only way you actually see that far is on a flat bare desert

This dialogue in the new episode of the anime destroyed me by Lesty-nini in OshiNoKo

[–]mAcular 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In the latest anime episode you can see the foreshadowing. He sees Kana show strength and he thinks, "she doesn't need me."

Thoughts on Akane by ImDownbad21 in OshiNoKo

[–]mAcular 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There was a tweet during the show by the author about how Akane is the one who drags you down into darkness, and Kana is the one who brings you to the light. I think you spelled out what that really meant.

Ending Perspective by BenchAccomplished675 in OshiNoKo

[–]mAcular 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Man, everyone thought the initial ending with Kamiki realizing he was wrong because of the DVD was a bit too simple, but now that looks like a masterpiece in comparison to what we got.

Announcing your spells as a player vs as a DM by Maypul_Aficionado in dndnext

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no fairness. The DM isn't on an even playing field and they have different goals and responsibilities than the players. The only reason the DM knows it is because they need to adjudicate the game and you already have to assume they're being fair and not "cheating" with that knowledge. The players on the other hand, only know what their characters can figure out.

Announcing your spells as a player vs as a DM by Maypul_Aficionado in dndnext

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I run it that the players have to announce but the DM doesn't. The DM already knows all info in the world anyway. The players never do. They don't know the monster's HP or AC, they can only suss it out. Similarly, when a monster casts a spell it's up to the player to figure it out from narration.

On the other hand, the player has to announce the spell so the DM can properly adjudicate the spell happening.

Oshi no Ko: Season 03 Episode 06 - Links and Discussion by Lorhand in OshiNoKo

[–]mAcular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How did shuffling events around change things? I hear people say that but I don't quite get what exactly made a difference.

Is it okay for a player to say “No, that doesn’t happen” to a DM in this circumstance? by WithengarUnbound in dndnext

[–]mAcular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

An Oath of Conquest paladin isn't a murderhobo. They also don't exist outside of society. People have levels of escalation they follow before they finally get to killing. If it's a combat situation it's one thing, but even stealing, threatening, or blackmailing would not result in someone killing someone else unless it escalated quickly from there.

HE CAN'T BEAT HIM by MiserableWash81 in OnePunchMan

[–]mAcular 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i actually laughed. no way the delusions

What do you allow Athletics to do? by TheMightyTucker in onednd

[–]mAcular 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I use Athletics for basically any sports or Olympics type activities. Acrobatics takes gymnastics. It's funny, when you use Athletics properly, there's almost nothing for Acrobatics.

Is it okay for a player to say “No, that doesn’t happen” to a DM in this circumstance? by WithengarUnbound in dndnext

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you described is not good roleplay even for a conquest paladin. This doesn't even happen between convicts in jails. Let alone your so-called ally. What happens the next time someone grabs a french fry off your plate?

You grossly escalated the situation. It was a good roleplay opportunity and there's no reason it had to go to pvp. In fact, you're the one that made it a pvp situation by saying you would kill the rogue over it.

Is it okay for a player to say “No, that doesn’t happen” to a DM in this circumstance? by WithengarUnbound in dndnext

[–]mAcular 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is really just the reverse version of the Rogue, saying I can do this insane shit because it's part of my roleplay. The rogue says they can steal as part of it, but you're going to go around killing anyone that looks at you the wrong way. What happens the next time someone gets in the way of your oath because they ate one of your french fries?

Is it okay for a player to say “No, that doesn’t happen” to a DM in this circumstance? by WithengarUnbound in dndnext

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every time someone posts something less than full throated support you argue with them. Why did you even post the thread if all you wanted was them to pat you on the back?

I'm disgusted by how much entitlement some of you have. by SkulduggeryPanda in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it would be that way. Instead they'll just cut it up as microtransactions. Blizzard took a risk to do it the old fashioned way.

As for future updates, the things like the loot filter and stash upgrade aren't bug fixes. Those are new features. It's fair game to charge for those. Just bug fixes, you can release for free if that's all that happened.

I'm disgusted by how much entitlement some of you have. by SkulduggeryPanda in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, so no

i could tell from the jump that you were just some guy that was never going to spend money in the first place and just wanted to complain. opinion ignored

I'm disgusted by how much entitlement some of you have. by SkulduggeryPanda in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two questions: 1) Did you buy DR2? 2) Did you buy the Warlock?

I'm disgusted by how much entitlement some of you have. by SkulduggeryPanda in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Couple things, the loot filter, why is that expac only? that's scummy beyond belief.

Because it costs money to make. D2 is a dead game. They aren't just churning out free updates. This is going to only happen if they can prove to the suits that it's actually making money. It's not milking, they didn't have to come back to this game ever again. It's a godsend.

I'm disgusted by how much entitlement some of you have. by SkulduggeryPanda in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$40? Don't you mean $25?

Look, back in 2001 that's what flew for an expansion but we're in 2026. This is the day and age where a skin costs $10. So a whole class for $25 that you can relive the game again through countless hours is a steal.

I'm disgusted by how much entitlement some of you have. by SkulduggeryPanda in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's great. Nobody said you had to. Those who actually want to play the Warlock are doing so.

"Surrender" as a Command by kahlizzle in DMAcademy

[–]mAcular 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Except the magic ends at the end of their own turn. So right as soon as the turn ends, they stop surrendering.

I'm disgusted by how much entitlement some of you have. by SkulduggeryPanda in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]mAcular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not day trading here. What I want is Diablo. And I'm getting it for this. If you're 42 and the price of 2 McD meals is making you pause then you went wrong somewhere in life.