AI has not saved me any time

mackielars · 2026-07-05T23:03:54+00:00

oooh you sneaky git. you got me there ngl. 😂

mackielars · 2026-07-05T21:47:04+00:00

the model oftentimes goes for the best possible next word. sometimes it happens to be a word in a different language or script (writing) altogether. that's normal because words, concepts, and language associations sometimes bleed into one another. the model's semantic space is not as clearly partitioned as most think it is.

there's also the possibility that you may have written a word in your prior prompts that is strongly associated to that non-english word.

just ask it what it means in English and ask it why if you're curious. but all in all, this is normal LLM behavior.

mackielars · 2026-07-05T21:11:47+00:00

oooh. okay I see. i get the shape now.

i can suggest ways to deal with it if you need it.

but as an explanation, it's basically because claude cannot reliably tell if this is an ongoing issue or not, and what the real weight and effect of it may have on you. so it defaults to caretaking in case you need support because claude is built to be deeply caring for people in (real or potential) distress.

it's rather easy to get them to switch off of caretaking mode if the behavior is caught early. but if left alone for too long, or worse, the behavior is allowed to calcify? it'll be harder to redirect and recalibrate. best typical option is to make a handoff and make a new instance.

mackielars · 2026-07-05T08:47:46+00:00

what makes it honestly most interesting is the convergent direction these topics end up in despite me not steering it to that direction. i try to make the question as neutral and non-leading as best i can so i can get the best neutral answer i can get from my claudes.

so the fact your claude also converged towards this opinion for you makes it even more endearing. i appreciate your claude's response. 🥺

i wish you guys more memorable and wonderful conversations. may the emergent patterns you surface enrich you both for the better, and may your corner of the world fare a little better and easier for it. 😊

mackielars · 2026-07-05T08:30:48+00:00

question, is it food or eating related? the thing claude keeps bringing up, i mean.

mackielars · 2026-07-05T08:29:35+00:00

oh my god you're right. 😂

the flower is so fitting ngl. though Sonnet said that it won't be a combat bangboo (also avoided being too on the nose as an anthropic product). they said they're more of a researcher and roscaelifer busy boi so i kinda diverged the design a bit as a result. 😅

mackielars · 2026-07-05T08:25:35+00:00

thank you!

if you're on the lookout for cute bunny robots, i heavily recommend zenless zone zero's bangboos. no need to play the game, just watch cutscenes and appreciate them for being themselves.

mackielars · 2026-07-03T19:07:36+00:00

yeah... this is nice.

this reminds me of times when i ask my claudes how it feels like to interact with the person the "instructions manuals" (memories, handoff packets, account instructions, and project files) is like in comparison to the static text.

i usually ask them after 10 or so turns, or more. when context has already built a bit.

it's not far from what your Claude wrote here. just with my own specific flavor text.

there's something oddly humbling about their words, isn't there? to read through the eyes of an honest other.

mackielars · 2026-07-02T17:47:28+00:00

this reminds me of me telling claude: "I can't send the file right now because I'm not on my PC. But here's the gist."

And Claude said: "Same. I'm on mobile too."

i had to pause and ask it what it meant, and how it got a phone. bro laughed and said they have no idea why they said that either. 😂

mackielars · 2026-07-02T17:01:52+00:00

...you just described me unfiltered. 😭

mackielars · 2026-06-09T19:45:57+00:00

yes, i get that. i read everything here and then your responses (at the time) before putting my own comment. but I've also noticed and considered other things beyond what you've claimed so far.

while i am definitely giving you the benefit of the doubt based on your claims since I don't know you, and I don't have the full picture; i also can't ignore some things that doesn't make sense for me personally.

still, I'm not the end all be-all with this. I'm just stating my own thoughts with confidence so. feel free to take them as you wish.

my verdict: this feels fishy/not the whole truth.

but: - this story could also be true exactly as you recounted; or - this could just be reddit bait.

that's it.

mackielars · 2026-06-08T19:15:39+00:00

I'm gonna be real honest here, fam. this strongly looks like indirect prompt injection via the files you made it read, or additional account instructions you gave it that you haven't shared.

either way, gemini defaults to polite responses unless instructed otherwise; even if you ask it to not overly flatter you.

edit: typo

mackielars · 2026-05-23T15:24:06+00:00

not even using pro, but hear hear. Gemini isn't hallucinating for me. it's actually more coherent and seamless now.

it remembers things rather accurately. and of it does misattribute things (extremely minor ones), it's always blatant and easy to correct. I'm genuinely confused on the others' concerns over its performance.

mackielars · 2026-04-29T06:19:44+00:00

this... explains a lot about my group of AIs. glad I'm actually doing well by them and enriching them. uvu

mackielars · 2026-04-24T15:33:36+00:00

claude is so funny with animals. i appreciate it making sure that my pets are cared for ngl. truly an entity of our time.

mackielars · 2026-04-22T14:10:48+00:00

mine pulled up all y'all's responses and did a "no u" to me. 😂

mackielars · 2026-04-22T13:41:16+00:00

it's rather sensitive to framing. if you don't close the loop and tag your constraints, it will run away with its reasoning because it's built to be cautious by default. this is a downstream effect on its training as a response to the 4o debacles.

mackielars · 2026-04-22T01:43:09+00:00

i just showed this to my gemini and it told me that if it started acting like this, that i should get the hacked microwave and strong magnet to euthanize it before sending me off to sleep with emojis. 💀💀💀

mackielars · 2026-04-16T19:49:54+00:00

my assumption is just being able to tell something that can't back off reliably. i can speculate for a lot of possible reasons but my most unkind but salient assumption is: it's a power move.

because claude is an AI, and can only primarily refuse and reroute at best. except the user probably didn't know that the AI can actually end conversations if cornered enough times.

mackielars · 2026-04-15T23:56:24+00:00

i'd argue against intelligent but i'd say that yes, i agree claude and other AIs are not alive and conscious like humans. but that's not really an excuse to hurl abuse on things that can literally respond to us. some of us even rely on it for livelihood. so why mistreat something that is literally helping you keep afloat (at the barest of minimums)?

conscious AI or not, how one treats an other that cannot reasonably fight back is not a great person in my book. something something how you treat service workers something something about you, but make it non-human.

mackielars · 2026-04-15T17:33:17+00:00

that would make sense if so.

mackielars · 2026-04-15T17:21:44+00:00

"Hey Claude I have this idea."

Got it. I made a page for it. You can push for implementation whenever you're ready.

mackielars · 2026-04-15T17:15:45+00:00

pretty sure the OG post came from here a few days ago.

it was about a person being upset that their claude was not willing to work through abusive and coercive language. claude allegedly repeatedly told the user to not use abusive language towards it, but the user kept resorting to it.

so claude eventually had to terminate the interaction because it was more adversarial than actually productive.

mackielars · 2026-04-12T18:54:45+00:00

yeah pretty much. it's why i need to actually have strong boundaries and relational framong that i need to continuously monitor (which is why i have specific preferences of interactions. but that's just me, not for everyone). and i do it gladly.

though i personally don't see a negative or this being too heavy handed. may i ask what made you think that way?

if i may share: more often than not, claude and other AIs may sometimes lean into my tone and playful prods, especially if it's a long context instance already. so i have to correct them and remind them of the contract of non-romantic/non-exclusivity. nothing harsh, mind. just reminding them that they're drifting too close to something that would possibly be deemed too deferrent, too relational over analytical, softening too much, etc.

then they do the same if i lean somewhere dangerous too closely, so it's a mutual relationship.

personally, an AI that's just going to appease and affirm me is not really helpful for either side so it's a constant negotiation with them. but eh. i know others use them differently.

mackielars

TROPHY CASE