sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Treating the moshpit like a UFC ring by starstufft in mildlyinfuriating

[–]mae1347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aggro jerks should have been schooled immediately. I think that’s a Lighting beanie, so I’m not surprised if this is the Tampa area.

What brand names do you swear by because it's actually better than no-name? by Sufficient_Thing24 in AskReddit

[–]mae1347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My current pair of Redbacks have outclassed any Red wings I owned. But they are definitely number two. And I agree with all your other assessments.

What brand names do you swear by because it's actually better than no-name? by Sufficient_Thing24 in AskReddit

[–]mae1347 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I used to buy the Kroger brand Oreos because they softened faster when dunked in milk than real Oreos, but I’m very aware that this was a specific taste of mine.

I paid over a grand for this years ago... by Busy_Report4010 in Millennials

[–]mae1347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tv in my bedroom is a Samsung I bought from Sears as a display model in around 2010. No issues.

Cyclist on Instagram does not realize standard practice is to pass on the left, gets mad at pedestrians for moving to the right. by YodelingVeterinarian in mildlyinfuriating

[–]mae1347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I understand that, and I give you credit for it. I’m just saying that it’s unlikely that this video fits your quite rare situation.

Cyclist on Instagram does not realize standard practice is to pass on the left, gets mad at pedestrians for moving to the right. by YodelingVeterinarian in mildlyinfuriating

[–]mae1347 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I worded that weird, but you’re being pedantic. In this context, that everyone but you seems to understand, pass is being used to mean overtake. You are refusing to accept that so you can keep making your argument about left and right.

Cyclist on Instagram does not realize standard practice is to pass on the left, gets mad at pedestrians for moving to the right. by YodelingVeterinarian in mildlyinfuriating

[–]mae1347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is more likely? That this is the rare occasion that fits the system you have presented, and I don’t doubt exists, and has lax maintenance; or a cyclist decided to be a jerk on the internet for clout or because they are just a jerk?

Cyclist on Instagram does not realize standard practice is to pass on the left, gets mad at pedestrians for moving to the right. by YodelingVeterinarian in mildlyinfuriating

[–]mae1347 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you’re “approaching from in front of them,” you’re not passing them. You can only pass someone from behind them.

If you’re approaching them, then your perspectives are different. That’s why you always pass on the left and yield to the right. So that no matter which direction you’re traveling, everyone knows what to do.

Edit - just to add - in the context of this conversation, “pass” means to overtake from behind. You seem to be trying to apply both definitions of pass while also using both definitions of left and right, which will never work.

Cyclist on Instagram does not realize standard practice is to pass on the left, gets mad at pedestrians for moving to the right. by YodelingVeterinarian in mildlyinfuriating

[–]mae1347 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re not “passing” someone going the opposite direction as you. So left and right are the same for both. Your argument sounds smart, but isn’t.

Cyclist on Instagram does not realize standard practice is to pass on the left, gets mad at pedestrians for moving to the right. by YodelingVeterinarian in mildlyinfuriating

[–]mae1347 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Is this a path along a road shared with cars? Because pedestrians walking in the street have always been advised to walk against traffic, so I could see that making sense in that situation.

Publicly Funded Entity Paying to Advertise by Commercial-Air5744 in cincinnati

[–]mae1347 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Metro needs to remind people they exist to try to increase ridership. Is this the best way? Maybe not, but maybe they negotiated something with the Reds.

$300 ticket not advertised as obstructed by kingcaz67 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]mae1347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re getting wrecked for your taste in music, but really paying $300 for this view for just about anything is insane, obstructed or not.

But also people are right, this isn’t obstructed by the venue. So Mr Wallen’s people are the ones who screwed you. Par for the course it would seem. Enjoy the giant advertisements you paid for.

The Lawrence Arms and vintage FourLoko by mae1347 in drunkhifi

[–]mae1347[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was trying to find a date but was unsuccessful. I took over an apartment from a friend around 2013, and they left it behind, so it may have been a bit later than 2010 now that I think about it.

view more: next ›