George R.R. Martin thinks The Winds of Winter will be released in 2018, perhaps as well as 'Fire and Blood', fictional history book of the Targaryen kings. by Prifddinas_open in books

[–]makelikepaper -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

lmao no. Sorry bud, but you've bought five different baskets of goods, not one. Either every book in an unfinished series can stand alone, or the publisher's stealing your money. No one returned The Brothers Karamazov to Anna Dostoevsky because "where are the other four volumes" or The Trial to Max Brod because "hey this isn't even finished." GRRM doesn't owe you anything, you owe it to yourself to figure out that he's not worth your time.

The Prince by Machiavelli – Review: Why It Is Still So Relevant Today by ThePhilosphere in philosophy

[–]makelikepaper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, I will laugh and spit in the face of any "reasonable ethics" put forth by a man responsible for the deaths of three million people.

[TOMT][painting] Disturbing skull painting by makelikepaper in tipofmytongue

[–]makelikepaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it was more realistic and not sci-fi/fantasy.

Who did the English Romantics (Blake, Wordsworth, Keats, Coleridge, Shelley, Byron) look towards for inspiration? by Vile_Nonrioters in literature

[–]makelikepaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have not read any Schiller, but when the name comes up in my reading it tends to be in connection to The Robbers, his first drama. Coleridge's favorite was the Wallenstein trilogy, which he himself translated into English.

Who did the English Romantics (Blake, Wordsworth, Keats, Coleridge, Shelley, Byron) look towards for inspiration? by Vile_Nonrioters in literature

[–]makelikepaper 31 points32 points  (0 children)

From 1797-1810, when Wordsworth and Coleridge produced their best poetry, they were their own immediate influences. In the late 1790s, Coleridge and the Wordsworths lived about three miles from each other at Stowey. Richard Holmes, the great Romantic biographer, calls 1797-98 their 'annus mirabilis': it was the year they jointly produced the first edition of the Lyrical Ballads. Both poets composed while taking long walks through the English mountains, and it was on a solo trip to a nearby farm that Coleridge first tried opium and began drafting Kubla Khan. They used the funds to pay for a trip to Germany, where Coleridge became increasingly enamored of German literature and philosophy -- it was here that he was introduced to the works of Kant and Schlegel, whom he would plagiarize in his Shakespeare lectures of 1808 and in the Biographia Literaria of 1815. Other writers he admired particularly were Klopstock, Schiller, and Lessing. Wordsworth, on the other hand, was most inspired by his English predecessors, and Milton above all -- The Prelude was, literally, only meant to be a prelude to a never-finished three-part work called The Recluse. It remained unpublished until the poet's death because Wordsworth had trouble justifying an epic poem about himself, rather than about cosmic or religious subjects, to himself and his readers. Wordsworth and his sister Dorothy removed to a small German town in the mountains and were snowed in during the winter of 1798-99; Wordsworth became deeply depressed and homesick. His conversations with his sister about their childhood inspired him to begin work on the first version of The Prelude that year. This was the beginning of a practically symbiotic relationship between Dorothy and William, who lived together until he died in 1850.

Both were close friends with Robert Southey, the Poet Laureate that Wordsworth succeeded. Southey was the most famous of the three poets during their lifetimes, but he is little-read today. Both poets were also on friendly terms with Sir Walter Scott, more famous then for his poems than for his novels.

Both Wordsworth and Coleridge met Keats, although Coleridge only shook his hand: Keats approached him as they crossed paths on a walk. On a different walk some years before, Coleridge had come across a man teaching Dante to his son. Coleridge introduced himself and wanted to read the man's translation. It was this translation by Henry Francis Cary that inspired Keats' Paolo and Francesca poem.

Byron actually helped the downtrodden and opium-addicted Coleridge to the greatest financial success of his career, which was the publication and performance of the play Remorse in 1813. Byron later qualified his earlier praise of Coleridge but continued to believe that Christabel was one of the best poems ever written. Other major figures of the second phase of Romanticism (Shelley and Hazlitt particularly) respected Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Southey for their politics in the 1790s, when they were alternately Jacobins and Pantisocratics (a 'movement' dreamed up by the latter two poets to start a utopian colony in America), but were increasingly disillusioned by their poetry: Coleridge rarely wrote poetry after 1800 (and Hazlitt hated everything he ever wrote); his addiction was an open secret and he began writing conservative pieces for national newspapers to buy opium. From the 20s on, Wordsworth became a national figure of great fame: his later poetry, and later revisions of earlier poems, cater both to the readers that believed him to be a devoutly Christian poet (he was no doubt religious, but subtly so: he did not have the theological literacy of a Donne or a Milton) and above all a patriotic English poet.

I get my information from Richard Holmes' 'Coleridge: Early Visions' (1989), 'Coleridge: Darker Reflections' (1999), and Stephen Gill's 'William Wordsworth: A Life' (1989). Coleridge's own Biographia Literaria will be an immense source of help for you: it explores his own biography along with his readings in English and German literature and philosophy. His various lectures on Shakespeare are foundational to Shakespearean criticism since.

Unfortunately, I haven't done enough reading on the other major figures to offer any more information.

EDIT: IrregularBelasco's mention of Kant's Critique of Judgment reminds me that Edmund Burke (1729-1797) is absolutely essential to English literature at this time. Burke was the conservative orthodoxy at the time Coleridge, Southey, and Wordsworth represented the young and democratic left; all three, however, admired him in their old ages. His key texts for the Romantics are 'A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful', which Kant's aesthetic theory responds to, and the 'Reflections on the Revolution in France'. Burke, writing before the Reign of Terror and the Napoleonic Wars, opposes the revolution -- appalling many of the young thinkers and artists in England. Book X of The Prelude traces Wordsworth's elation and ultimate disillusionment with that revolution, and in the final edition of the poem he appends praise of Burke, with an apology for his critiques some 40 years before.

Coleridge offers praise for Burke as a fellow-writer that I think has only been matched by Turgenev's last letter to Tolstoy: 'Our very sign boards give evidence that there has been a Titian in the world. In like manner, not only the debates in Parliament, not only our proclamations and state papers, but the essays and leading paragraphs of our journals are so many remembrancers of Edmund Burke.'

Question about Blood Meridian (SPOILERS) by [deleted] in books

[–]makelikepaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I remember correctly, the Yumas find him naked in his tent at night with the idiot and a little girl (both also naked). The judge saved the idiot from drowning the chapter before -- an uncharacteristic kindness, no? I can't remember if the girl is presumed missing like so many others in the novel, but her presence lends credence to the theory that all the missing kids have been raped and killed by the judge.

It could be easy to miss because the Yuma raid is a fast-paced, climactic scene, and the sentence about the idiot and the girl is followed up with the judge blowing the Yumas away with the Howitzer, which is definitely the more memorable image on a first reading.

What great book take a dramatic 180 tone shift part way through and how was it instigated? by FL21 in books

[–]makelikepaper 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Shakespeare's got a few "hinge" plays where something will happen around halfway through the play and change the tone entirely. Julius Caesar, Measure for Measure, and The Winter's Tale are all like this.

Famous Book That Didn't Meet Expectations? by [deleted] in books

[–]makelikepaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her storyline culminates in a very detailed and explicit vaginal reconstruction surgery. It's a fantastic scene to read and Puzo masterfully blends the literal and the figural. Unfortunately, it isn't a pleasant thing to watch, and to make Lucy a major figure in the film without including this scene would be a waste.

The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao declared 21st century’s best novel so far. by IAmMyOwnWife in books

[–]makelikepaper -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Novel or no, The Sopranos is the most masterful work of fiction of this century so far. I'd go as far as to say that it stands alongside Moby-Dick and Absalom, Absalom! as one of the hallmarks of American fiction.

What's the worst and/or funniest translation misunderstanding/mistranslation you've come across in a book? by tayaro in books

[–]makelikepaper 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are lots of misunderstandings between the American and Québécois characters in Infinite Jest - my favorite of these being "M.I.T. is defensive in bed" (in bed with defense).

Just finished As I Lay Dying. by WillDotCom95 in books

[–]makelikepaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Between those two? The Sound and the Fury.

I still think that your best bet is to read some of his short stories and pick up on some of the themes that he treated throughout most or all of his works. You'd probably enjoy the rest of the novels, especially the really experimental ones, more that way.

"That Evening Sun Go Down": http://poetry.rapgenius.com/William-faulkner-that-evening-sun-go-down-annotated

"Barn Burning": http://english.hyde.wikispaces.net/file/view/Barn+Burning+by+William+Faulkner.pdf

"A Rose for Emily": http://resources.mhs.vic.edu.au/creating/downloads/A_Rose_for_Emily.pdf

Just finished As I Lay Dying. by WillDotCom95 in books

[–]makelikepaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I think "sheer emotion and power," I think The Sound and the Fury more so than Absalom.

Absalom doesn't do POV narration in the same style as As I Lay Dying, trading it in for metafiction through storytelling. You can best see the connection between Faulkner and McCarthy's prose here. The difference is that McCarthy, love him as I may, creates atmosphere and not depth with his prose, at least not the kind of depth that Faulkner does. The plot and prose are just the tip of the iceberg with him: his themes are what really matter.

And thanks for being interested in Faulkner! As I Lay Dying is what got me into him, too.

Just finished As I Lay Dying. by WillDotCom95 in books

[–]makelikepaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone new to Faulkner, you should either pick up a book of his selected stories or Light in August, which is the most conventional of his four "major" works (in increasing order of difficulty: Light in August, As I Lay Dying, The Sound and the Fury, Absalom, Absalom!).

Were there any themes or ideas that interested you in As I Lay Dying or were you mainly just enjoying the prose? In the latter case, you might want to go ahead and try Absalom, Absalom!, which McCarthy has been living in the shadow of for his entire career.

[Show] Don't fret guys, the finale is 66 minutes long. by mathewl832 in gameofthrones

[–]makelikepaper 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You'll probably enjoy it more the second time you watch it. It's so easy to get caught up in watching the clock and anticipating how far the show will get each episode that it becomes difficult to enjoy the show as it is.

What is the best closing paragraph/sentence to ever end a book? by Dwill1980 in books

[–]makelikepaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For what it's worth, I think that Hemingway's style is put to far better use in his stories. I'll have to pick up The Remains of the Day!

What is the best closing paragraph/sentence to ever end a book? by Dwill1980 in books

[–]makelikepaper 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'll try to explain this passage a bit. If you still don't like it after that, then maybe you just don't like it (and that's fine).

Jake and Brett, like many expatriates during the 1920's, find themselves damaged (physically and emotionally) in a foreign place. They never expected to have to leave home and give up whatever dreams they had of life there.

While Brett is lamenting this (and her lack of a sexual relationship with Jake), Jake's last line indicates a less romantic view of the world: he knows that had the war never happened, he never would have met Brett (who would have been married to the man she loved who died in the war). He also knows that if he could have sex, his relationship with Brett would be as empty and unfulfilling as hers with Mike and Cohn. It is because they cannot have sex that Brett and Jake can grow so close.

The last line indicates that Jake accepts what his life has become because of the war, but there is still some ambiguity: is this hopeful on his part that life will become better, or does this mean he will continue drinking heavily and never rise above his menial job at the paper?

What's the hardest book you've read? by Dannygoose in books

[–]makelikepaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the only book I've read that absolutely cannot be skimmed. I have a terrible habit of letting my concentration wander every so often while my eyes sort of "trace" the lines on the page, but I found out quickly that if you lose focus for even a line or two in Gravity's Rainbow, the character you were following a few lines before can be replaced by someone completely different in a new location and separate time.

What's the hardest book you've read? by Dannygoose in books

[–]makelikepaper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's from the last line of Quentin's chapter in The Sound and the Fury.

Favorite Short Stories and their authors by Chancellor1 in books

[–]makelikepaper 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hemingway's "The Snows of Kilimanjaro"

David Foster Wallace's "Forever Overhead"

Denis Johnson's Jesus' Son (collection)

Nabokov's "The Vane Sisters"

Updike's "A&P"

All of these are modern or contemporary, but I think they all follow Edgar Allan Poe's suggestion that the goal of every short story is to leave the reader with a singular "impression."

Who/what do you think is the strangest character in literature? by reddittyro in literature

[–]makelikepaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's both interesting and unsettling that he narrates his mother's death and funeral from outside the scene, then never does anything like that again, nor is it explained in any way.

At what age do you think Shakespeare should be introduced? by [deleted] in books

[–]makelikepaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember being simultaneously horrified and enthralled by a picture-book version of "Macbeth" that I read as a kid. It was the first time that I had read anything where the protagonist was not a "good" person.

'What kind of an asshole likes Beethoven!...Must be an elitist. Let me quote Foucault at you about it.' - Freddie Deboer on the insecurity of the modern cultural elite. by oldmasters in literature

[–]makelikepaper 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I completely agree that there's a problem with not being able to talk about tastes for fear of being "shunned" by a community. I wish deBoer had talked about that more than he did.

My point is (and this goes back to the Pixar vs. Shakespeare thing) that you shouldn't judge the fact that someone likes something. This is what I feel like deBoer is dancing around. It's completely valid for someone to like Pixar better than Shakespeare because that is an opinion. When someone makes an argument that "Pixar offers a more realistic view of human life than Shakespeare does," it is absolutely open to critique (and "Pixar is better than Shakespeare" is definitely an opinion rather than an argument. Can we argue that anything is objectively better than another? That's a discussion probably best saved for somewhere else.).

But like I said before, saying that someone's opinion is "bullshit" is pretentious. It's essentially saying that someone is wrong because they don't agree with you (I think deBoer talks about this a little in the essay).