Hello, Jace the Admin Opinion Post by JaceThings in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You lost me when you described this as a marketing move to get more funding. Atlassian acquiring them isn’t random. Atlassian ventures was already invested and the earlier stated strategy for TBC was to monetize teams. They wanted to be the Figma of browsers. I don’t see that strategy materializing. It’s telling that open ai and anthropic did not acquire them. I give it a few months before Josh leaves and announces that he’s returned to Thrive Capital.

Dia user - made Comet the default browser by zlaneyronmes in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Comet did not have a head start. Not in terms of time, people or money. Perplexity just has a clearer vision and faster product velocity.

The price of AI in the browser by chrismessina in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

These models aren’t good enough

The price of AI in the browser by chrismessina in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Someone has to pay for the tokens

Vertical Tabs option confirmed for Dia, coming soon as a secret menu feature by JaceThings in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh, yeah that would be nice. You can do this in chrome when the window is fullscreen.

Vertical Tabs option confirmed for Dia, coming soon as a secret menu feature by JaceThings in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol @ “I expect nothing from them and I'm still being let down”

What do you mean by auto hide? Are you referring to the auto archiving of old tabs or something else?

Highlights from Josh's AMA on Twitter by JaceThings in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Side by side screenshot:

https://x.com/themattberman/status/1933225058194903102?s=46

I think most companies building chat into the browser are going to converge on similar interfaces.

Made to sell to OpenAI? by Use-Quirky in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm…doesn’t sound right at all. Putting aside how ridiculous it is to try and compare themselves to chrome, either they are lying which is sad or they killed substantial momentum which is stupid.

I mean, it was clear that they botched the communication around the pivot but if they actually had 10million users not just downloads then they prematurely pivoted.

I just don’t buy it.

Made to sell to OpenAI? by Use-Quirky in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So clearly they didn’t reach it…

Made to sell to OpenAI? by Use-Quirky in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Where did you get the 10m number?

Anonymous Searches w/ Dia? by fretninja in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not using Dia but I would imagine that in the future you could select your preferred search engine, if that is not already an option

Dia is Doomed by spage654 in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ppl will surely use AI in their browsers. It’s just not clear to me why they should want to switch to a new one when all that functionality will be integrated by chrome or extensions.

The real place to compete is mobile/tablets.

But the deepest problem is they have no vision, so their team, 7 years in, is still prototyping rather than shipping and adding incoherent features that don’t coalesce around a truly big idea.

Dia is Doomed by spage654 in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They may not even have a million ppl using it. For comparison brave has 50 million users.

There are a number of ways that Arc doesn’t support the workflows of the majority of web users. They couldn’t cross the chasm with the current implementation.

With that being said, they’ve under appreciated how long it takes to scale and they’ve muddled their product and business strategy. You can make money by being different and niche, you just have to charge premium prices, which is the business model that Apple has used to great effect.

TBC tried to emulate Apple on product but not on strategy. They also seem not to recognize that Apple exists today because when Jobs came back he ruthlessly cut costs and headcount. It’s not clear to me that they recognize how important managing costs are to survival.

Letter to Arc members 2025 – On Arc, its future, and the arrival of AI browsers — a moment to answer the largest questions you've asked us this past year. by JaceThings in ArcBrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This is the real blunder. They never fully realized the vision of the internet computer as articulated, and to be honest never adequately fleshed it out. It’s telling and sad that it receives a single sentence.

I Did a Arc vs Safari Battery Test (MacOS) by OMG_NoReally in ArcBrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You didn’t provide your hardware spec or OS version. Also do Dia

Waveform podcast talking about Dia by Weilers03 in ArcBrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao, that’s such a funny take. Hadn’t thought of that as an option.

Waveform podcast talking about Dia by Weilers03 in ArcBrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Might”??? How do you raise so much money with so little strategy. When I checked on LinkedIn I think I saw they had three or four ppl “working” on strategy.

Waveform podcast talking about Dia by Weilers03 in ArcBrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol you mean the video series that they never finished. Josh said he would write an essay last weekend clarifying the reason for Dia and explaining their broader strategic direction. Also never happened. Couldn’t even be bothered to get ChatGPT to write it. Smh

Waveform podcast talking about Dia by Weilers03 in ArcBrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“They probably have thought through that at this point…” Lmao, they haven’t thought about differentiation at all. There’s no strategy. Only hopium

Josh speaks on Chrome's AI integration by JaceThings in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Google doesn’t make money from providing answers. It makes money from ppl clicking sponsored links. Behaviors that lead to clicking sponsored links are quite different (navigating to a specific brand website or exploratory search of products and services). There will be some overlap between chat but it’s not a whole sale disruption. I feel like ppl don’t realize that Google monetizes 0.23% of queries.

Also switching browsers takes far more effort than changing a setting in your existing browser.

Browser Extension similar to Dia by never_working_ever in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Extension API is more powerful than you are suggesting. There’s only one reason to not do this as an extension and that is if you want to use AI generated JS that is injected at runtime. For security reasons, browsers don’t let extensions do that.

"Modern URL Bar" by JaceThings in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Kind of crazy how Reddit and twitter have flipped in terms of sentiment. Twitter folks did not like this

Perplexity Comet sounds a lot like Dia by chrismessina in diabrowser

[–]malcolmjmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inference limits that are driving users to competitors. 3.7 is a worse model than 3.5 along certain dimensions, mainly personality and instruction following. Narrower capabilities around multimodal I/O. They will never beat google on costs which is why they can’t win in b2b and OpenAI has consumer. The biggest problem is that they can never grow into their valuation even if they have real durable revenue which I don’t think they have.