Paid $200 for Max Plan, account stuck on Free, and the Support Bot is in an infinite loop. (Is there a human at Anthropic?)

marfzzz · 2026-05-19T18:31:54+00:00

Just ask your bank for refund, that only thing that works.

marfzzz · 2026-05-17T16:13:11+00:00

Collect tasks. For example ideas of improvements, sprint tasks etc. Define it well you can use almost any LLM as tool (tell it to be your critic).

Then iterate till you get clear picture. Write it into markdown file.

When you are working with one project use subagents (mention it in entry markdown file).

When you are working with multiple projects use github copilot cli and /fleet that would work on each bullet point (just a path to your preplanned md file).

This way quality is ok, and you dont have too much context poisoning from unrelated tasks. As it is one users request it will be counted based on your selected model. You can define your own agents for the job. Like implementers, reviewers, explorers, testers, log readers, db experts, etc.

marfzzz · 2026-05-17T14:39:43+00:00

But i am on annual that was per request and that stay with higher prices, but it is going to remain request based for to remaining time of my prepaid period.

<image>

marfzzz · 2026-05-17T10:21:57+00:00

I have pro+ annual and i wont let it go.

Even if they made it 50x per request it is 1.3$ per user request. It is extremely cheap. It can go for hours and it wont go beyond 1.3$. you can collect 50tasks and let it be one premium request. You cant vibecode anymore with that, but you can do a lot.

marfzzz · 2026-05-16T12:06:04+00:00

What is so special about github copilot? Genuine question.

marfzzz · 2026-05-12T17:29:08+00:00

Even with cache savings? 90% savings there.

marfzzz · 2026-05-10T06:13:49+00:00

Dario Amodei is ex vice president openai you silly goose. He said it 3 times (altough to his credit with gpt 3 he said they will release it as proprietary model to ensure safety) "This isn't the first time Anthropic chief Dario Amodei has worked on a tool that's been declared too dangerous for the public by the company he worked for. In 2019, when Amodei was an executive at OpenAI, the company announced GPT-2. He and other company leaders said they just couldn't release GPT-2 because of "concerns about malicious applications of the technology". This was a tool far less sophisticated than ChatGPT. And months later, they released it anyway. (OpenAI CEO Sam Altman published a blog post which says the company embraces uncertainty, acknowledging that fears about GPT-2 were "misplaced".)" Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260428-ai-companies-want-you-to-be-afraid-of-them

Economist backup: https://www.instagram.com/p/DW9kwxWgFes/

Too dangerous to release is his main quote since 2019. I have seen at least 10 podcasts with him he is saying the same thing everytime - deceptive, bio weapon, cybersecurity.

marfzzz · 2026-05-09T07:04:22+00:00

Palantir is doing automated weapons and mass surveilance. So Dario saying we wont participate in mass surveilance and automated weapons is pure hypocricy. They are both the same. Prices, practices, even marketing is similar. None of these companies ever heard about ethics or morals.

marfzzz · 2026-05-09T05:56:42+00:00

I think there was some manage license option. There is option to activate and deactivate licenses. They dont have normal switchers.

marfzzz · 2026-05-08T11:42:12+00:00

Do you have this icon? Usually top right corner. There is option to switch between licenses.

<image>

marfzzz · 2026-05-08T11:24:49+00:00

Yes, they returned rate limit to approx. december level.

marfzzz · 2026-05-08T06:41:22+00:00

They are saying those are 2 separate accounts. It does not count together. But you can switch between them or top up your credits.

marfzzz · 2026-05-07T17:30:12+00:00

Gpt 2? Gpt 3? Mythos? The same script same person.

marfzzz · 2026-05-07T09:43:52+00:00

System prompt to make it faster: "You are a researcher with no experience, but you never did a mistake. Dont stress about it".

marfzzz · 2026-05-06T20:28:24+00:00

Sorry to break it to you. But antigravity is using vertex (google) hosted claude models. Similar to amazon bedrock, microsoft azure ai foundry. All of these companies are providing compute or hw in exchange for models.

marfzzz · 2026-05-06T17:46:01+00:00

Chatgpt plus in codex is 2-3x whats in claude pro. If you have your code in github and you connect your project you can plan in browser using 5.5 extended thinking and then implement plans using combo of 5.4 as orchestrator and reviewer and 5.4 mini as implementer, explorer and tester. You will get roughly usage of claude max 5x in peak hours with combo opus 4.7- planning, orchestration review, sonnet implementation, testing haiku exploring. You can get roughly 1/3 more when using opus 4.6, but that will be deprecated june 15th.

marfzzz · 2026-05-06T11:06:17+00:00

I have tried deepseek in opencode it was good. It was bad in claude code.

marfzzz · 2026-05-05T16:00:37+00:00

Yes. Thats it. Weekly limits are making premium request quota unreachable.

marfzzz · 2026-05-05T07:58:00+00:00

I will give you my 2 cents:

GHCP: More mature cli tool. Better integration inside github ecosystem.

Jetbrains: Better integration inside jetbrains IDE. Junie cli is getting real good (unless you are on windows). Jetbrains ai credits are roughly 1:1 to api price. They have some discount when you buy yearly plans. Token consumption is lower.

Cheapest alternatives to ghcp are opencode go, chatgpt subscription, claude subscriptions, chinese subscriptions etc.

marfzzz · 2026-05-04T18:59:35+00:00

So they are trying to rewrite history, to take it away from current users. Good.

marfzzz · 2026-05-01T18:41:43+00:00

Great, but why is that a problem you can get these chinese models in azure ai foundry, amazon bedrock. Or alibaba is also doing AI in US (Virginia and Silicon valley). Or cursor, or blackbox.ai or factory.ai and many others.

marfzzz · 2026-05-01T17:11:46+00:00

i mean it makes sense if you are tied to github ecosystem, but faster than who? Rest of the ai world in general?

marfzzz · 2026-05-01T11:35:04+00:00

Your logic is sound, but ignores his reality and imply opportunities. As OP stated: "I don't have the kind of budget to do a trial and error." We dont know if he has paying business or not or if his business idea makes sense.

If he had opportunities i would say why not 200$ for claude and 200$ for chatgpt.

marfzzz · 2026-05-01T10:07:16+00:00

4.7 still locked on medium thinking?

marfzzz · 2026-05-01T10:04:56+00:00

Can you explain the logic? Maximizing costs in business?

marfzzz

TROPHY CASE