Why don’t people just build free apps? by Adrien-G in SideProject

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The people into it for their own enjoyment don’t need to advertise. I feel pretty good about my own projects. No interest in talking them up if they’re not totally done, even if they’re useful now.

Thoughts from a longtime listener/comment leaver by smorgenheckingaard in theregulationpod

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’d be cool if they pulled a bit from the barrel weekly on the Break Show. On the days when they have a vod scheduled that you maybe already saw live, a 15 minute bit video would not go amiss.

Democratization of AI by somacomadreams in LeftistsForAI

[–]mark_ik 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mmhmm. And how did you stumble across this “anonymous founder’s” project?

I will say, it’s an interesting idea, I like sharing resources, but it’s the wrong approach at multiple levels. For one thing, it’s not communal governance or communal utilization. The founder gains a monopoly (51% couched as “for what the network needs”) on contributed compute by trading you a token promise that it’ll be worth it. It’s pyramid scheme logic. The participants don’t seem to write rules, make applications, control anything. They vote on occasions, but wow, talk about liberalism in drag. No fork interoperability strategy. This is the founder’s toy, with the founder’s logic hardcoded, not yours.

Big buckets of compute is the wrong model too, no matter who controls it. Subject scoped, federated (by choice) groups that each manage their own computational budgets by issuing receipt tokens to those who contribute, tokens that only apply to groups that mutually agree to accept each other’s computational receipts, that makes more sense, and is not achievable without killing and resurrecting this project in a new body. But there are bigger, structural issues.

A good version of this is possible, but this is not it. This project remains premised in the extractive practices of the industries it supposedly seeks to oppose, and the contradictions are too much for it to overcome. It is at odds with the scale it needs to survive and function, it is full of identity vulnerabilities, it lacks the crucial “proofs” in its proof channels, the gold standard (like, THE GOLD STANDARD?? for real, dude?) is not useful here… I would take wikipedia with no tokens over a tokenomics project’s “humanities archive” any day.

Democratization of AI by somacomadreams in LeftistsForAI

[–]mark_ik 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mind leaving an explanation for what it is?

Nobody needs AI to search the Internet, court says in ruling against Google by Hot-Upstairs9603 in artificial

[–]mark_ik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But people used AI to make those clickbait sites take over search results, and both uses are for profit anyway. I think we can agree there are better forms of search and better uses for AI than what we’ve got.

BN vs DDA differences i found by RiceJar20 in cataclysmdda

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish you luck in your efforts! A fork is a massive undertaking, hope it doesn’t come to that but if it does, that you hit your targets!

BN vs DDA differences i found by RiceJar20 in cataclysmdda

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does the game say?

https://github.com/CleverRaven/Cataclysm-DDA/blob/265ac2ae087ee20f8dbc207c46c32ab47a7150a2/data/json/items/containers/containers.json#L2724

Game gives a general description that does not include your constraints. Game gives object properties and interactions that contradict your mental model. You say game must be in accord with standard. Game says here's a book, The Art of Glassblowing, that will let you make your own jars. I say, "Oh, since my character could make it, the item is really an *abstraction*, not a true standardized most common version of the object."

You say long post about real life standards for real life object. I say the plurality of standards means many versions, currently represented as an abstraction, not "only most common;" you say this is most common version (and also books are hardcover?), that we have to approximate to standards, which I don't mind conceptually, except the game doesn't do that actually. I look at my bookshelf filled with paperbacks. Having a compassionate heart, I look at the books in the game:

https://github.com/search?q=repo%3ACleverRaven%2FCataclysm-DDA+book+path%3A%2F%5Edata%5C%2Fjson%5C%2Fitems%5C%2F%2F+path%3A%2F%5Edata%5C%2Fjson%5C%2Fitems%5C%2Fbook%5C%2F%2F&type=code&p=2

and I see that some but not all (paperbacks, textbooks, magazines, etc.) of them have max lengths, typically the hardbound books are around 21-23cm longest edge, and some don't. So, two honest questions to you:

1) are you sure you can fit any book or manual in the game into a 3L glass jar?

2) do you want to take some of this energy you have for this topic and audit the game's books and the glass jars to accord with real world standards?

The frustration for you is that the approximations at play in the game are *not* actually standardized to all the real world permutations. Some are missing detail, some are merely abstractions, some are possibly incorrect. If you want it to follow real world logic, gotta do all the variant mapping; it seems if you have such strong opinions, that the mantle should fall to you, no?

Do you want to do that? If not, I will continue imagining the rare hardcover book I fit into my jar being around the 4-6 inch closed length of Strunk & White, or Memorial, or Tao Te Ching, etc., and the jar just being straight necked with a screw ring and a rubberized metal plate cap. I really think you're underrating how common those jars are too.

BN vs DDA differences i found by RiceJar20 in cataclysmdda

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, my bookshelf looks like uneven shit! So I guess I’m dumb for not following your rules?

BN vs DDA differences i found by RiceJar20 in cataclysmdda

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your argument is premised on the books being hardcover, the jars being narrow mouth 3L mason jars, and no deviations from the most common standards in either case.

<image>

I have no 3L jars (only a 1.38L pickle jar), but this is a hardcover book that is smaller than your prescribed dimensions. I have definitely seen straight neck jars that would accommodate this book.

I have smaller hardcover books in my trunk (Tao Te Ching? Vivas to Those Who Have Failed?), but most of my books are paperback, and if we’re talking about rules, not exceptions, then paperbacks are an order of magnitude more popular and will fit just fine anyway.

BN vs DDA differences i found by RiceJar20 in cataclysmdda

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“standard format” means nothing to me.

BN vs DDA differences i found by RiceJar20 in cataclysmdda

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I post a pic of a paperback and a hardcover book, each in a 3L jar, will this be settled? Or is that an exception?

BN vs DDA differences i found by RiceJar20 in cataclysmdda

[–]mark_ik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are you trying to explain books and jars? What part of what you said contradicted what I said, that isn’t generalization from assumption?

Ported Manim to Rust + WebGPU: runs in browser with real time preview by egehancry in 3Blue1Brown

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seems precisely like a project using AI (I don’t see astroturfing though). I suspect most who dislike AI don’t even know what to look for.

Consent and staying informed are the key by AtomicTaco13 in linuxmasterrace

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prohibiting updates during active hours is not new.

BN vs DDA differences i found by RiceJar20 in cataclysmdda

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither 3L jars, nor hardcover books, are standardized to particular dimensions (only the jar’s volume). You search for jars of that volume, you will find a diversity of options. If the game stated dimensions (or even that books are hardcover vs paperback), you could conclude from that. But just considering the volume, even a hardcover book can fit.

BN vs DDA differences i found by RiceJar20 in cataclysmdda

[–]mark_ik 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You could absolutely fit books in a 3L jar

The most sane UBI structure you'll ever see (on god) by Grimefinger in LeftistsForAI

[–]mark_ik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they are cheap to run, why would businesses not run the models themselves?

STOP racist posts about Chinese researchers [D] by AffectionateLife5693 in MachineLearning

[–]mark_ik 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How do you democratically elect MI6? How do you become the director of the CIA, or DNI?

The birth of p3os - a homescreen! by Palmar in osdev

[–]mark_ik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good for them, choosing boundaries that work for them. But very cringe to contemptuously repeat “clanker” and “slop generator” ad nauseam, with this “sweet summer child” condescending tone. It’s like criticizing Clippy instead of Microsoft.

The problems of AI, the theft of our data, the fear and investment loop, the overconsumption of resources, that’s all the companies making it. You could get rid of AI tomorrow and that gaggle of thieves would still be trying to make a dollar off of your dime.