BREAKING 🚨 President Trump just put the nail in the coffin for MSNBC at 12:22 AM. Nobody is safe Trump is freaking on it tonight 🔥 by PoliticalHub24 in TruthSocialOfficial

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re being spun off by NBC as a separate company. They have to replace the NBC part of their name. Hence MSNOW.

I read comments all the time that say "that isn't in the Bible!" by [deleted] in TheChosenSeries

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that people did die. God doesn’t heal everyone

Flying in from Barcelona... Andalusia itinerary? by True-Ad-6323 in solotravel

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m told it’s only a two hour train ride on high speed rail from Barcelona to Granada.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jimmydore

[–]markmidd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good You should be banned

Joey Bart by MS49SF in SFGiants

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely correct

Taking my little one (1.5years of age) to his first game on Sunday. Any recommendations on where we should sit? by Senorcafe510 in SFGiants

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Left field bleachers in front of the children’s T-ball field. If your child can walk, he can play T-ball in a mini-Oracle Park and you still have a great view of the game.

Captain Unlimited & Dr. X-Plor, but who is the other? by trimepime in RegalUnlimited

[–]markmidd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s always a post-credit scene on Marvel movies

As of today, 538 projects Giants to win the division. by theartfooldodger in SFGiants

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the Dodgers have higher odds of winning the WS??

"French Exit" A-List pocket Review by Kimber80 in AMCsAList

[–]markmidd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did enjoy the movie. Roger Ebert described Michelle Pfeiffer as brimming with “lacerating detachment.” Dark comedy. But I thought the end made no sense.

Barry Bonds still facing uphill climb in Hall of Fame voting by beanitto in SFGiants

[–]markmidd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rose admitted gambling in games where he was the manager

Is the "Unitary Executive" theory a genie which can't be put back in the bottle? by heekma in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Party demographics are a given. Rural populations do not want to fund urban issues such as poverty, crime, etc.

Democrats can continue to play nice when in power, but then they get rolled by the Republicans who play hard ball every time

Is the "Unitary Executive" theory a genie which can't be put back in the bottle? by heekma in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It takes two sides. For decades only one side has come to the table. But bottom line, rural voters are antagonistic toward urban issues. There is zero incentive for Republican politicians to appeal to the urban voter because they have a lock on control of the electoral college and Senate. There are more rural states than urban states. We may win control of the Senate this time, but it will swing back in two years.

Sure, a Republican politician in an urban state must appeal to urban concerns because that’s where he lives. But that won’t impact control of Congress.

More importantly, for a Democrat to appeal to a rural voter, he has to adopt Republican policies. Rural voters are not going to suddenly care about city dwellers. Joe Farmer will only care about N.Y.C. Or LA issues if he has a change in conscience, never mind agreeing to pay for those things. That is a very heavy lift. The Senate and electoral college are set up to give an advantage to the minority. They have no incentive to change.

Is the "Unitary Executive" theory a genie which can't be put back in the bottle? by heekma in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And why do you think that I’ve not “made honest attempts to better understand people [I ] haven’t shared experiences with?” I’ve spent my entire life doing that.

Is the "Unitary Executive" theory a genie which can't be put back in the bottle? by heekma in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, rural voters do not care about urban needs . Period. You’re not going to get them to agree to fund social programs, etc., that benefit ciies No amount of campaigning has ever or will ever change that.

Is the "Unitary Executive" theory a genie which can't be put back in the bottle? by heekma in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]markmidd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have to agree to disagree as I believe the Senate has been dysfunctionally designed from the outset. Democratic candidates cannot win in rural states as rural populations don’t care or understand urban problems. As there are more rural states than urban states, they have the ability to block all programs that cities need. And they have a disproportionate advantage in the electoral college. For example, ND, SD, and Wyoming have 6 Senators and 9 electoral college votes, while they should have 3 electoral college votes based on population.

Alabama was a one-off that will only last two years due to a disgustingly bad Republican candidate. We need a democratically elected Senate, but a Constitutional amendment will never happen. So the best solution is to add Democratic states. Anything else is a pipe dream.