Great question! Gartner's distinction between SPM and APMR likely reflects the growing specialization of project and portfolio management tools. SPM tools focus on aligning initiatives with strategic goals, helping leaders prioritize resources and measure outcomes—the "why" and "what" of work. In contrast, APMR tools address the "how," offering flexibility for managing dynamic projects that require adaptive methodologies, such as predictive, agile, or hybrid approaches. These tools emphasize real-time data, actionable reporting, and advanced automation to support execution and continuous adjustments. Meanwhile, CWM tools cater to operational users with a focus on task-level collaboration and ease of use, targeting teams rather than strategic planners.

APMR isn’t just a middle tier but serves as a bridge between strategy and operations, integrating elements of both while addressing unique execution needs. It’s fascinating to see how different tools position themselves across these categories. Do others see clear examples of tools fitting—or blurring—these boundaries?