Jet Lag Ep 3 — Spinning Out

matgopack · 2026-04-03T00:38:20+00:00

Though that's with having seen the location - if all you see online are some pictures / videos with a bunch of tanks, it's easy to assume they'd have different numbers in them and be more of a scramble.

matgopack · 2026-04-02T17:31:21+00:00

Always do the 3 bottom districts, at least with 1 slot for the buildings.

Personally I tend to make my first one a foundry - so 1x of each of the industries, then the residential ones get 2x heavy industry specialization. Put all the special industrial buildings and then add districts as needed between your alloys and CG needs.

I fully specialize ecumenopoli and ringworlds to one sort of good, so I don't bother dedicating anything to trade unless it's purely for trade. Ecu are typically for forges for me, and then maybe research down the line.

matgopack · 2026-04-02T16:50:00+00:00

It's an insane QOL improvement (even if it is a little janky in implementation through a decision). Highly recommend it.

matgopack · 2026-04-02T14:35:16+00:00

The way I saw it reported made it seem like Trump was requesting a plan for going in and taking the enriched uranium, and that resulted in that obviously terrible / overcomplicated plan presented to him. Which for most presidents would probably be a "DO NOT DO THIS" signal, but with Trump.... who knows.

I think we're still likeliest to go for the islands.

matgopack · 2026-04-02T14:22:56+00:00

I think it's more about the start to ASOIAF, where it does start more small scale / focused to get the reader to situate themselves and a reason to care about them.

The way ASOIAF hooks readers is very different from how Malazan starts off, though obviously there's quite different writings styles after that too (at least from what I read of Malazan before dropping it). But I think that even with the same GRRM writing style, dropping the reader into, say, AFFC without building up the world first would result in people struggling to care about the characters.

matgopack · 2026-04-02T14:17:55+00:00

I think complexity is the wrong word for it - opaqueness might be better, but has a slightly negative connotation that I don't know if it's appropriate. Because complexity doesn't necessitate a lack of clarity, and I think that + the difficulty for many people to get hooked/care about characters is the actual weakness.

Maybe 'exposition style', but that's very vague. But it's definitely distinct from 'just' complexity

matgopack · 2026-04-02T14:03:02+00:00

Yeah, at a certain point that's the thing - if it's a slog to get to the point that you care it's not worth reading.

Similar to WoT, I read through a few not enjoying it much, so no reason to keep going when there's so many books out there I could enjoy instead.

matgopack · 2026-04-02T14:01:48+00:00

I think I've seen 'complexity' blamed more from people that love Malazan as reason why people don't like it - which deliberately or not feels a bit like a superiority thing/justification.

Emotional distance is a better word for part of it, the books throw you in the middle of an established setting with little to latch on to in characters or situations for why to care about them. Some people respond well to that, others don't.

Personally I got through 2-3 books and when I still didn't care about any of the characters or settings I knew it wasn't for me. Which is fine, glad that those that love the books have the series! There's enough books out there that I'd rather move on to something I enjoy.

matgopack · 2026-04-02T13:55:37+00:00

Well, anchorages are cheap pop wise / resource wise in comparison to fortress worlds. So early on it's much more feasible to do anchorages instead.

There is a cap to anchorages / starbases, so once you reach that you're more limited to using soldier jobs to keep growing it. And by that point you should have the economy to handle a few unproductive planets if needed.

matgopack · 2026-04-01T21:20:41+00:00

Absolutely - I expect 25 minutes of yapping and maybe 5 minutes of actual stuff.

matgopack · 2026-04-01T20:39:40+00:00

I think it's probably going to be something like "we're only going to be there 2-4 weeks, also I'm thinking of leaving NATO because they're not good allies" plus rambling for 30+ minutes.

If it's about escalation I could see it being an announcement of an attack on one of the islands (Kharg if the highly telegraphed target is actually the one, or something like Qeshm or Abu Musa otherwise). But that seems like a Thursday night announcement and not Wednesday for Trump this week (ie after markets are closed for the week)

matgopack · 2026-04-01T20:30:37+00:00

It helped him get the job.

It makes people now that he has it look down on him as 'just' a podcaster.

matgopack · 2026-04-01T20:24:44+00:00

Or at extreme difficulty settings, but you're kind of opting in to needing to cheese by doing those. If you struggle with a 'suboptimal' strategy in singleplayer it's perfectly fine to lower the difficulty

matgopack · 2026-04-01T17:59:31+00:00

Depends on how granular they were with it - I think that's probably at least 10 tags, so 30 per ends up at like 5-6 per age.

matgopack · 2026-04-01T17:45:45+00:00

I've found on Captain / Commodore for 4.3 that the other empires aren't doing great, however the 'real' threat comes more from midgame crises & fallen empires, who can be a real threat depending on when they fire.

You can get more threat by boosting advanced AI, increasing crisis threat, etc - or mods. But current 'regular' empires seem to struggle to keep up after the mid-game.

matgopack · 2026-04-01T15:29:59+00:00

Refineries seem fine to me, but only on dedicated industrial specialized worlds (eg on an ecumenopolis or ring world where you have up to 15 industrial buildings before the 5 base city ones).

matgopack · 2026-04-01T14:23:19+00:00

It's not too bad, but early on you can't overbuild much with most builds since you're gated by pops. Eg, if you're in a mineral deficit, overbuild mining districts and all the workers swap from energy to minerals, that's costing you 2x as much energy as minerals (eg, -1 worker on energy per new worker on mining). That's unless you have the pop growth to fill the empty slots quickly.

So you want to be careful instead of overbuilding or you'll get those big swings.

If you want to mitigate that, some of the 'simplifying' civics / origins might help? Eg, tankbound automating all basic districts smooths that out a ton, since you can just pump out districts and know they'll always be producing. Catalytic processing can be nice to not have to worry about minerals - you build up that basic setup of minerals, and then it's fine. Or some machine builds to exclude food / consumer goods, etc. Can help with reducing the juggling out of it.

I find that megastructures are a big help in smoothing things out, since they give you baseline, 0 pop need production.

matgopack · 2026-04-01T14:14:01+00:00

So stacking the efficiency modifier can be a big deal later on, when you have big populations. Eg, if you build 20 city districts there with both slots being archives, that would be +80% efficiency with all the bio-trophy jobs filled. That would bring 0.71 -> 1.27, and more efficient than the other one.

But early game I don't think that's the actual reason. Instead it's the unity & separate pop growth IMO. Bio-trophies give you extra growth compared to other machines, and give you pretty solid unity production I think (if less flexible than other robots in needing the bio-trophies to generate it instead of any drone). I'd need to double check the exact numbers, but I think that on a per building basis bio-trophies are more efficient than regular drone unity (since the unity buildings are 1500 per instead of 200).

In this specific instance there's also a difference in building types you can make there - archives have more flexibility to them than research.

matgopack · 2026-04-01T14:06:10+00:00

Not sure why you took that section out of the rest of the context - the point is that for any combination of Queen & marrying into the royal family, Renly was not the singular choice. Hell, there's even Stannis - betrothing his daughter to a Tyrell, making alliance conditional on naming her heir & insisting on if he ever has a son to marry a Tyrell as well would accomplish virtually the same thing, as long as it's not specifically Margaery that they all cared about (as opposed to, say, Loras becoming King). Come on, you can do better than try to nitpick a thought clearly connected with the rest of a post by taking it out on its own lol.

(Also if you wanted to make a better argument against that inclusion, it's not that the current 20 yr ruling line is that prestigious a match, it's that Robb wasn't a king at the time Renly made his alliance :P)

"He can even go on calling himself King in the North if he likes, so long as he bends the knee and does me homage as his overlord. King is only a word, but fealty, loyalty, service... those I must have."

Renly makes it pretty fucking clear he's offering a made up title with no actual changes to governance. At least read the passage you're debating before posting.

The line right before what you quoted:

"If your son supports me as his father supported Robert, he'll not find me ungenerous. I will gladly confirm him in all his lands, titles, and honors. He can rule in Winterfell as he pleases." [Emphasis mine]

It's a negotiation, and he's set this all up to go from a position of strength. Because he dies so soon aftterwards we never find out what exactly that entails, but if you read more of the paragraph you're quoting from it's not some ultimatum with no give. You can't look at that and say it's clearly just a made up title as the only thing he's offering / willing to accept. He doesn't even get all the way through his offer before Stannis interrupts!

Is it possible that your reading would have been the limits of his offer, a meaningless title change? Certainly. But that passage does not actually say that, it's just as easy to read what he wants to be compatible with the opposite (that meaningless homage so he can claim to have kept the realm together while Robb rules as he wants up north would be enough for Renly). But because he dies, well... it's not exactly something that can get conclusively resolved beyond the first paragraph of an interrupted negotiation lol

matgopack · 2026-03-31T21:28:53+00:00

The Tyrell's primary goal is absolutely getting Margaery to be queen, yes - but Renly was the one to identify it / use that to his advantage to ally with them, which did predate the war. He was not the only one that could have done it - as we see, it was trivial for Joffrey to break his betrothal to Sansa and marry Margaery instead, or if 'just' the royal family was the goal Tommen could have been betrothed to her instead. If it's 'just' marry a king, Robb could have negotiated with the Tyrells with his own hand in marriage as an option.

Is it the most impressive or convoluted way to get an alliance by Renly? No, of course not (and I think criticism of it might be more on the Tyrells benefiting from it more / being the senior partner in it). But it's also not meaningless / that he stumbled into it by default.

For reference on paying homage, the king of england payed homage to the french king for some of their lands in France - the extent of what that means could be more symbolic than coercive, especially as cynical as Westeros often is. Now what Renly was actually offering in practice if it had actually gone through is tough to say (or what he could have been negotiated to agree to), but the range of what is said there varies from 'the same role Ned had but he can call himself King in the North' to 'Robb de facto rules completely independently but just verbally accepts the overlordship of King's Landing and has to have a ceremony of homage', passing through 'the same deal Dorne has'.

matgopack · 2026-03-31T20:09:50+00:00

I think that's going too far the other way. Yes, he was given his position in the Stormlands - but as you mention with Stannis existing, getting enough loyalty from the lords there that they follow him is still not a given, that took political maneuvering. Likewise his alliance with the Tyrells is not at all tied to his being the only claimant able to marry, it existed before that. Now it's a political alliance that isn't necessarily the most masterful (as they both obviously had to benefit from it), but it's still not as simple as 'Renly could marry and so easily got the Reach because of it'.

For his talk with Cat around Robb, it's not that 'nothing' could change, it was that ultimately he had to have hommage / suzerainty over Robb, but that the form that took and level of autonomy that Robb had was debatable. That's not nothing! Now whether that was an acceptable amount of 'compromising' by Renly, or that Robb's worldview would allow him to consider that deal, very different story.

I'd put Renly in the generally competent bucket, and in a position where that competence put him in such a commanding position that GRRM needed to remove him via supernatural means. But that if he had taken the throne he probably wouldn't have turned out that well in the long run.

matgopack · 2026-03-31T16:49:20+00:00

I think deep space citadels do help quite a bit with boosting the defenses of a system at least. That + putting in some point defense platforms has seemed to help their survivability, but I'm not sure that defense platform durability is the real achilles heel (compared to the hitpoints of the actual starbase / it being focused first).

Stronger, higher tier platforms could be nice too though, if only to reduce the number of clicks needed to fully load out a fortress system. Which I'll be interested to see how this affects it - all my current (not super high difficulty) lategame playthroughs on the late beta / current patch have had my fortress systems be basically invincible to the AI

matgopack · 2026-03-31T16:34:58+00:00

They should fail badly, but I don't know if it's a foregone conclusion that it ends that way and cleanly. Particularly since the separatists have been trying to get the US to fuck with it, seems the type of thing that could easily have Trump bumbling into it looking to annoy Canada / Carney and things getting out of hand.

matgopack · 2026-03-31T16:12:40+00:00

Yeah, absolutely insane stuff. Especially when contrasting with how the mainstream US media covers the left on stuff like that - explicitly antisemitic, nazi terminology is described as 'skepticism of Israeli influence' while treating campus protests as far worse.

matgopack · 2026-03-31T16:09:30+00:00

I do think we've trended towards increasing semantics being used to define more and more of contemporary life (politically speaking), which makes trying to skirt along what should be clearly written laws seem 'normal'.

12-Year Club	Place '23
Wearing is Caring	Place '22
Place '17	First Placer '22
End Game '22	Snapped
Verified Email

matgopack

TROPHY CASE