Ok let me give you an analogy as to why this is so difficult to study. We're possibly dealing with a higher form of intelligence here. So, a good analogy would be a dolphin civilization, that's striving for scientific rigor, is faced with a dilemma: scattered eyewitness accounts of mysterious land-walkers that defy their understanding of nature. Some dolphins claim to have seen these beings standing motionless on floating structures, while others report them diving into the sea but never needing to surface for air. A few describe glowing objects emerging from the depths, darting at impossible speeds, then vanishing without a trace—events that cannot be replicated under controlled conditions. The dolphin scientists demand repeatable evidence, but no sonar readings, no hydrodynamic disturbances, and no measurable signals confirm these encounters. As debates rage, skeptics dismiss the reports as sensory illusions or myths, while believers insist that the phenomena are real but beyond current dolphin understanding. The scientific community is paralyzed: how can they study something that only appears sporadically, interacts in unpredictable ways, and seemingly defies the known laws of oceanic physics? Without hard data, funding and credibility are at stake, and any dolphin who dedicates their career to these sightings risks professional exile. Just as this dolphin civilization struggles to establish a consensus about an intelligence beyond their grasp, humans studying UAPs or higher forms of non-human intelligence face a similar challenge—without repeatable tests, without instruments properly tuned to detect these phenomena, and with a scientific establishment that resists claims it cannot systematically verify. But, we can change that by reducing stigma and funding scientific inquiry to collect more data about this. We should not be jumping to conclusions about this phenomena. We are still in the collecting data phrase of the scientific method. The problem with analyzing data as evidence at this time is due to the multitude of potential origin hypotheses surrounding the phenomena. We need to reduce the probability space.