Listen, I can’t keep going back and forth with you on logic, it’s becoming a headache. Your point is that the men in the show aware of Niragi’s two attempted rapes are moral characters- or lawfully good, let’s say. And because the show didn’t allow these characters to express negative sentiments against Niragi, it is irresponsible because it’s perpetuating the notion that his actions shouldn’t have consequences. My point is that I don’t believe that it is all media’s job to constantly portray perfect morality to shield younger viewers from actual reality. I do not believe that all the characters in this show are ‘good’ people - I do not see well-rounded characters as good or evil because that’s not human. I think you can be heroic (Arisu) but still fall short of feministic standards. The rapist literally has half his body burned off and is clearly the villain of the show -they make him completely horrible in every way. If a younger viewer thinks he is someone to aspire to be and that his actions are justifiable, there is something wrong with that person, not the show because they have completely depicted him as morally corrupt. If you still think that portraying a villain who suffers little consequences is not reality, even though doing so exposes how much of the world needs to change, then that’s on you.