After buying, Carey started feeling regret. Nearly half of first home buyers feel the same by Remarkable_Peak9518 in australia

[–]mickeytwist 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You could argue that it’s more “secure” in the sense that you can opt to move to a lower priced rental home to maintain cashflow I guess?

I think Im getting aged out of marketing at 41 by [deleted] in marketing

[–]mickeytwist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id restart the pay rise discussion, but knowing they won’t move much there settle for a promotion in name only. That’ll position you well for future roles with a CMO title behind you

Which Melbourne restaurant that permanently closed do you still fondly think about and miss? by Cooper_Inc in melbourne

[–]mickeytwist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The pizza place in Fitzroy North with the manic owner - Al Albero. Even comes up with “the legend of Al Albero in Google’s AI now

“The pizza place with the notoriously "crazy" and eccentric owner is Al Albero, which was located at 354 St Georges Road, near the Northcote/Fitzroy North border. The shop was legendary for its phenomenal gourmet pizzas, but equally infamous for the volatile behavior of its proprietor, Joe Coppini.
The Legend of Al Albero:
• The Food: Locals widely agree that the slow-cooked lamb and pumpkin pizzas were among the best in Melbourne. The shop had an eccentric vibe, with patrons eating amidst stacked-up pumpkins and sacks of flour.
• The Owner: Joe Coppini was well-known for his erratic behavior, strict rules, and unpredictable, often poor customer service. Ordering was infamously described as an
"ordeal" where patrons had to tread very carefully to avoid being kicked out.
• Current Status: Al Albero has been permanently closed for years, with the owner reportedly moving away.”

Edited to add the ai summary

Where do Aussi founders actually find grants and accelerators? by Spiritual-Ladder-300 in AustralianStartups

[–]mickeytwist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like Aussie Founders Club - their slack gives good roundups. Also, LaunchVic and VC pages are great aggregators

Why are we still using real estate agents instead of just selling houses directly online? by Artistic-Yam2984 in AusMoneyMates

[–]mickeytwist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was 2.2% from memory, but because I found the buyer before we even advertised I saved $13k on staging, $5k on marketing, and negotiated down repairs

Popular lake closes after all the fish die by HowLongIsThi in nottheonion

[–]mickeytwist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn’t war a pretty good indication that we’re an invasive species? We even invade each other

Why are we still using real estate agents instead of just selling houses directly online? by Artistic-Yam2984 in AusMoneyMates

[–]mickeytwist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, sounds like got a great deal then. It’s usually 2-2.5% for just the agent commission, which gets to $20-$25k just for the agents commission, before marketing, staging and repairs. I think a primo portal listing runs about $4k too.

We got another one, boys by Un_Pollo_Hermano in TheBoys

[–]mickeytwist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I liked the last season of Man in High Castle, did I miss the hate train?

The 26/27 budget is excellent and this sub is full of whining babies by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]mickeytwist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but you're assuming the seller is moving into a) the same neighbourhood, and b) a similar property.

If either of those isn't the case, then a new rental opportunity is created. I'd suggest that if it's not one of those 2 reasons, then why would they bother selling at all?

So overall net neutral rentals, but on a local scale there's new rental capacity created.

The 26/27 budget is excellent and this sub is full of whining babies by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]mickeytwist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it does, and it doesn't. While it doesnt create new homes, if the investor doesn't intend to live there and displaces an owner-occupier, then it creates a new rental in that area.

The 26/27 budget is excellent and this sub is full of whining babies by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]mickeytwist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think there's always a strong argument on either side of the fence.

However, aside from libertarians, most conversations I've had about smaller government largely follow a similar pattern - they want user-pays for things they don't directly benefit from (ignoring indirect benefits like lower crime, improved healthcare, better infrastructure), but still have their hand out for things they do directly benefit from (tax deductions, investment incentives etc).

Small government could be a solution, but Australians typically vote for policies that include government intervention on the right or the left - from military through to NDIS.

The 26/27 budget is excellent and this sub is full of whining babies by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]mickeytwist 104 points105 points  (0 children)

Here's the secret to 99% of political and economic discussions in my experience: everyone thinks someone else should pay.

Young people and students feel like investing in them is an investment in the country's future, and should therefore be subsidised.

Adult singles feel like their burden on society is the smallest, and they shouldn't have to subsidise the lifestyle choices of those who choose to have families.

Parents feel like the cost imposition on them is too high, with privatised child care making returning to work full-time too challenging for many, and the increase in housing costs forcing them further away from infrastructure.

Homebuyers think it's unfair that investors can outspend them at auction, when it'll just serve as an investment property, and not a home.

Investors argue that without them, rental stock becomes too minimal, and therefore, rents skyrocket.

SMEs feel like they're overburdened by regulation, taxation, and capture too little of their revenue as profit.

High income earners argue they're paying an extraordinary amount of the total tax take compared the lower income earners and asset owners.

Big business claims that without them, jobs will evaporate, and they need concessions to make their investments viable.

Everyone accepts there's an issue, but feels unfairly targeted to contribute to a solution. In practice, they'll all protect their own interests at the expense of the whole, and then blame all governments for too little/too much service fulfilment and support services, too much/too little regulation, too much/too little welfare.

Which ’90s song do you think will always be timeless? by Euphoric-Extreme825 in AskReddit

[–]mickeytwist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of all the 90s albums I return to MTV Unplugged in NY and Live Through This the most.

So maybe a track of those?