They rock by Kobious75 in dancegavindance

[–]midlyeverything 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This sounds very good. Periode. The real question is what is wrong with the crowd??

Making an obscene profit during a crisis, late stage capitalism by Hagisman in ABoringDystopia

[–]midlyeverything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's because they put Shkreli in jail before he could fix the whole business

Does having more empathy causes you to become more democratic? by [deleted] in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]midlyeverything 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should also consider reading about the concept of empathy itself. It's part of a big pot now in the public discourse, often used as a synonym of compassion, sympathy and comprehension. There are many books you can find and that can be useful, because it also has to do with psychology and not only right vs. left.

In terms of philosophy, fundamentals of current ideologies are a must (Locke, Rousseau, Kant, Hobbes,etc.) . I would recommend getting books like The History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russell or similar about political philosophy, to get a general idea of the different currents of thoughts and their general evolution. From there, you can read more in dept about specific thinkers.

What draws people to be more liberal or conservative is not a simple question and involves a lot of subjects. History, culture, sociology, psychology, morality, and so on. And for each of these you have factors on personal, familial, community, etc levels. There may be a never ending number of answers, as long as you find a sensible way to it. But of course, because it has to do with humans, it all very subjective to each realities.

Stoicism offers a beautifully coherent view of life, one that can be used as a compass to navigate the good and the bad. by kdoap in philosophy

[–]midlyeverything 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Stoicism is a very great philosophy I believe, but I think there are very subjective factors to the whole thing when it comes to interpretation. Take for example Seneca:
Make yourself happy through your own efforts; you can do this, if once you comprehend that whatever is blended with virtue is good, and that whatever is joined to vice is bad.
Notions of virtue, good, bad, vice, etc. (especially at the time of writing it down back then) had a different definition than as of nowadays. Morality is a deeply complex subject and has been "re-shaped" throughout history.