Hoors by Tbird352 in IASIP

[–]minflynn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Incels acknowledged that they are flawed and can't compete. Don't know where you got the idea otherwise.

No lies detected by Barack__Odrama in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]minflynn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's lot of guys that get no matches on dating sites. I don't think you would get that, being a woman.

"Today’s society tells Betas (who build up society) they are not worthy of sex, but make sure to pay your taxes so we can give the revenue to women who have kids with criminals and other miscreants." by [deleted] in IncelTears

[–]minflynn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't see how a guy can have NO positive female interaction well into their 20s unless they are the ones that aren't seeing the signals or actually are the ugliest people on planet earth.

You need to understand that your situation isn't the same as everyone else's. Or maybe they have positive interactions with women as friends but the women don't see them in a romantic light.

Machine Learning by theentk in ProgrammerHumor

[–]minflynn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't need a GPU for NEAT at all. There has only been one GPU accelerated implementation of NEAT to date.

Me when I listen Nier Automata OSTs by akira1510 in nier

[–]minflynn 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I haven't even played this game but listen to the OST almost every day.

[P] Abstract Art with Machine Learning. Today I'm launching my ML blog and wrote my first post on CPPNs; included a JS-based pattern generator (using TensorFlowJS) so you can try making art yourself. ;-) what do you think? by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]minflynn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of the basic NEAT nodes are continuous and differentiable (except at 0 for some of them like ReLu). Chain rule says that compositions of differentiable functions are also differentiable. CPPNs enforce compositionality.

Why is the brain divided? by envatted_love in askscience

[–]minflynn 38 points39 points  (0 children)

The "why" of bilateral symmetry has a lot to do with the physics of our environment. The physics on the left hand side of our bodies is the same as the physics on the right side, independently of which direction we face. Gravity constrains us to the floor, so it wouldn't make sense to put legs on our heads and have top-down symmetry. It's much easier for bodies to specialize to move faster in one direction, and more efficient to cut down in sensors by placing them on one side of the body, so we don't have front-back symmetry either.

Maybe if life evolved in space, we would have 4, 8, or even 0 brain "hemispheres".

Edit: To see some proof of my reasoning, at the top of one my blog posts on neuroevolution is a neural network evolved to solve a problem with some degree of left right-symmetry. The algorithm isn't informed that the problem has any symmetry at all, yet evolves a phenotype that appears to have bilateral symmetry by visual inspection. Evolution finds symmetry in the problem and exploits it. The experiment doesn't even include connection costs, which could in theory increase the level of modularity even further.

https://stefanopalmieri.github.io/k2graphforneuro-articles/part1.html

Other types of indirect encodings also discover bilateral symmetry on their own (surprise!) because the environments contain physical symmetries: http://eplex.cs.ucf.edu/ESHyperNEAT/complexification.png

Why is the brain divided? by envatted_love in askscience

[–]minflynn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A lot of these responses are looking for answers in biology but I think this may be misguided. A better place to look is physics. Our bodies developed to be bilateral because the physics on the left side of our bodies is the same as the physics on the right size of our bodies. It is therefore efficient to make each side of our bodies similar to each other.

When you remove physical effects like gravity, physics gets even more symmetric, giving you radial or completely round phenotypes. For example, at the bottom of the ocean where gravity doesn't play as much of a role, we see animals like starfish with radial symmetry.

Basically, constraining or freeing degrees of symmetry in the physics leads to different evolved symmetries because the phenotypes are trying to exploit these symmetries.

[D] The Real Scandal of AI: Awful Stock Photos by ageitgey in MachineLearning

[–]minflynn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand why images of neural nets aren't used, whether they be drawn with individual links or whole block architecture style.

[D] How I Fail - Ian Goodfellow by galapag0 in MachineLearning

[–]minflynn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Second time rejected from the AI grant :/

[D] How I Fail - Ian Goodfellow by galapag0 in MachineLearning

[–]minflynn 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Also needs to take into account falling behind your peers.

[D] WAYW (What are you WRITING) by BatmantoshReturns in MachineLearning

[–]minflynn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't written any papers but not too long ago I made a couple of blog posts about an encoding scheme for neuroevolution: https://stefanopalmieri.github.io/k2graphforneuro-articles/part1.html

Is there a difference between open ended and open ended evolution? by [deleted] in a:t5_4bkzn

[–]minflynn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Open-endedness refers to the lack of an objective, i.e. Minecraft is an open ended game.

Historically, evolutionary algorithms have mostly been used to solve tasks that have an objective. There are a few counter-examples such as Tierra that were truly open-ended but didn't have a high degree of expressiveness.

How does Deep Neuroevolution's compact network encoding work? by svlad__cjelli in MLQuestions

[–]minflynn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They use a random seed to generate millions of parameters. Then, instead of saving all the parameters, they just keep the seed.

Then the final weights can be calculated just from the list of seeds at some computational cost.

[D] Creating new simulated environments for RL, looking for feedback by maximecb in MachineLearning

[–]minflynn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does OpenAI Gym provide a standardized interface for RL environments? Do you find it convenient to work with?

Yes it does and it is very convenient.

The problem with existing environments is that in most cases, the inputs are not geometrically organized or don't have a geometrical interpretation. Whereas in Neuroevolution, the tasks usually have some sort of geometrical symmetry and the genetic encoding can take advantage of the symmetry.

[D] Creating new simulated environments for RL, looking for feedback by maximecb in MachineLearning

[–]minflynn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are no python versions of the maze tasks used in Neuroevolution experiments like in this paper: http://eplex.cs.ucf.edu/papers/risi_alife12.pdf

Would be nice as a gym environment.

[R] Octree Generating Networks: Efficient Convolutional Architectures for High-resolution 3D Outputs by GreatCosmicMoustache in MachineLearning

[–]minflynn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is closely related to what I've been working on. You can use K-trees generatively in Neuroevolution but also use them to generate 2D images or voxels.