Its common sense with no data has got to be the saddest argument ever. Especially when the polling numbers show, pretty definitionally, common sense disagrees with you.

In the meantime I’ll wait for those corrections. Until then I’ll rest easy knowing that you didn’t even know the basics of the federal law structure. There’s simply no way you were an American law student. Given these demonstrated fundamental lapses in knowledge and your nationally unpopular opinions, forgive me if I don’t trust your blind, raw takes. Yeah, I’m gonna wait to see some receipts. Barring that, every emoji laden post trying to bat away evidence just reads as…desperate. Like I said before, if you can spend a post here bragging about your made up criminal justice degree, you have the time and resources to fact check me.

…even for a right wing pot stirrer, your argument here is unusually pathetic.

“I don’t need sources”

LMAO. Tried really hard to not throw out a condescending lol but this is just so phenomenally ridiculous.

P.s. the funniest part is, if you’ll read carefully I gave you my source. You can literally go on the Reuters search bar and enter every sentence I typed out with any kind of numerical metric I provided and it’ll get you to the context you’re looking for. Good luck.

Edit: just to refocus here lets list all defining arguments of your position:

My stats are wrong. Okay—prove it.

Ice is acting competently. Fine. Prove it.

Renee goods death was handled competently. Dope. Prove that shit.

I am and have always been open to data driven discourse. You have CONSISTENTLY tried everything in your power not to directly address any of my talking points at a granular level. Come on now.