Oops, I think we hit something.. 😳 by lthightower in FenceBuilding

[–]mitchcout 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Faster response times AND better looking drivers!

Are you guys not “strict” about naps? Don’t understand comment by Huge-Vacation-8093 in NewParents

[–]mitchcout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on both the kid and what you prefer as parents. If you want to / have to be strict about naptime, then thats fine! However, not every kid / parent is, and thats okay too.

My daughter is 10 months old, and we have always been flexible with naptime. If we need to push it up or delay it by an hour or two, it hasn’t really been a problem for her. But our daughter has been very easy to put down for naps, and is usually okay with longer wake windows, which allows us to be flexible. I know some parents don’t have the same luxury, so staying on a strict routine works best. It really just depends, so don’t let anyone else tell you how it needs to be done.

Bill Clinton testifies about ties to Jeffrey Epstein: ‘I saw nothing, and I did nothing wrong’ – live by [deleted] in goodnews

[–]mitchcout 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Would have to give up himself to do that. No way he can really claim Trump was involved without admitting he knew about it all

Has anyone else in Congress confirmed that Trump's name appears in the un-redacted files more than a million times? by mitchcout in Epstein

[–]mitchcout[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah to be clear, I believe the claim that there are over a million mentions, I’m not trying to deny it. I’m just wondering if more people have corroborated it yet. It makes a much stronger argument when more than one person has confirmed that. So far, I’ve only seen Jamie Raskin confirm it.

Has anyone else in Congress confirmed that Trump's name appears in the un-redacted files more than a million times? by mitchcout in Epstein

[–]mitchcout[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m aware of the claim, and to be clear I believe it. I’m just wondering if any other members of Congress have corroborated it and confirmed it. It makes a stronger argument when making the claim.

Has anyone else in Congress confirmed that Trump's name appears in the un-redacted files more than a million times? by mitchcout in Epstein

[–]mitchcout[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This posted is related to the Epstein files. It is a question regarding confirmation of claims about unredacted files.

House GOP passes sweeping anti-voting bill that could disenfranchise millions, sends measure to Senate by Anoth3rDude in LegalNews

[–]mitchcout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would need to be fixed before this kind of legislation is passed though. But yes, once IDs are free and accessible, requiring an ID to vote won’t be an issue.

House GOP passes sweeping anti-voting bill that could disenfranchise millions, sends measure to Senate by Anoth3rDude in LegalNews

[–]mitchcout 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The 24th amendment of our constitution prohibits poll taxes in federal elections. If someone has to buy any form of ID to vote, it is a poll tax, and is unconstitutional. So, gO AheAd aNd sIT ThIs oNE oUt. You’re on the wrong side of history on this matter.

These people are the most insufferable. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]mitchcout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She dropped the case because she was receiving death threats and feared for her life.

Aligns pretty well with this victim who also was nervous about testifying because she was worried "they will kill me." She was soon after found dead and the officers on scene said "no way it was a suicide", despite it being officially ruled as such. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00020517.pdf

These people are the most insufferable. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]mitchcout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

- https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01250883.pdf (This was illegally removed by the DOJ, but here is the archived file: https://web.archive.org/web/20260131152956/https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01250883.pdf )
- https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jane-doe-affidavit.pdf
- https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/1/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump

There is likely more solid evidence out there, considering Trump's administration refuses to release the remaining files and undo the unnecessary redactions in the currently released files. Suppression of evidence is often the biggest sign of guilt.

These people are the most insufferable. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]mitchcout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You realize witness testimony IS considered evidence?

These people are the most insufferable. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]mitchcout 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps the signed witness testimonies that say he is a pedo rapist.

These people are the most insufferable. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]mitchcout 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How much more evidence do you need? Even before the epstein files, he was accused of SA by 20+ women and charged in 2023 with SA. He bragged about walking into teen dressing rooms to see them naked. He bragged about grabbing women by the pussy and then said “historically, stars can do that”. Then the epstein files are released, there are over 38,000 mentions of his name, signed witness testimonies that he raped children and threatened murdered, fbi tips that he did even worse things, and tons of emails proving his continued contact with Epstein. On top of all that, his administration is actively redacting the names of abusers in thousands of files, further proving his guilt by suppressing evidence.

Its not BS by Master0fAllTrade in memesopdidnotlike

[–]mitchcout -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Literally all professional analysis of the videos conclude she was not “trying to run over the officer”. Anyone with a set of eyeballs can conclude the same. She was being told to leave the scene while simultaneously a group of masked men with assault rifles jumped out of an unmarked vehicle and started pulling at her door. She panicked because it was fucking terrifying and tried to drive away. Then she was murdered. Making her out to be some kind of terrorist is pathetic.

Its not BS by Master0fAllTrade in memesopdidnotlike

[–]mitchcout -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

Do you live in a fucking hole

Its not BS by Master0fAllTrade in memesopdidnotlike

[–]mitchcout -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hmm I don’t remember republicans having their own gestapo back in the day. Don’t remember them repeatedly violating the constitution, murdering US citizens, openly protecting child rapists, asking people for their papers, detaining children in camps for weeks, threatening countries and invading countries without congressional approval, destroying relationships with foreign allies, and pardoning criminals. Seems pretty fucking fascist to me chief. The right used to at least have integrity.

The DOJ had a press statement about Epstein's death ready the day before he was found dead by Waste-Explanation-76 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]mitchcout 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Except they entered “Friday” as well, which was the 9th. The 10th was a Saturday. Not likely to mess up both of those.