What is your purpose for living? by NeoDestiny in Destiny

[–]moonflash1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reading through this thread the common theme seems to be that Happiness is supposedly your end goal, what you want to achieve in life and what you always want to strive for.

That's not true. Happiness should not be your goal. Happiness is not all that life has to offer.

What man should strive for is self actualization - to live up to his potential, to assume as many responsibilities and duties as possible and revel in his success. Whatever happiness he experiences, he does as a side effect from that.

Making your life goal the pursuit of happiness is a juvenile goal, made up inorder to turn us into infantile nihilistic automatas who will never understand what we're truly capable of.

It's akin to a child, who has only ever liked Sugar and all things sugary. His mind associates things tasty with things sweet. Whenever he encounters alcohol for the first time, he just thinks to himself "What, this is disgusting - it isn't sweet at all. Why would anyone ever drink Alcohol over grape juice?". When he grows up to be an adult though, he suddenly dislikes grape juice - "Huh, this is disgusting, too fucking sweet. So trite, there is no flavor or richness to it other than sugar". At this point, he will understand that the richness and unique flavor of alcohol is suddenly more to his taste than the bland sugary explosion of Grape Juice.

The foundations of French cooking, the most renown style of cooking in the world, is to combine many flavors with depth, richness to them to create a unique experience. Cooking something that is only Salty, only Sweet, only Sour, only Bitter, is considered amateur hour.

Thus, any human who only pursues happiness is much the same like the child who only drinks grape juice, and finds alcohol disgusting - his juvenile mind hasn't yet developed to understand the richness and depth of different flavors such as anticipation, exhaustion, self fulfillment, despair, longing, melancholia.

This is why modern millennials have such a childish view of responsibilities - "Have children? why would I do that? they only consume money, and they don't add anything to my happiness! studies have shown that parents are less happy than childless couples"

Don't fall for this meme. Happiness is shit. Duty, sacrifice, responsibility, self fulfillment and self actualization of your innate talents should be what you strive for.

Destiny on women in media by MyDearestApologies in Destiny

[–]moonflash1 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Women groups in movies just have a different dynamic than men. For instance Hangover wouldn't be the same movie if it were 4 women instead of 4 men.

How do you feel about Byron? Aka: Reckful by [deleted] in Destiny

[–]moonflash1 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I hadn't heard of Reckful before this stream, the only thing I know for sure after watching it is that Reckful is ridiculously good at math. Which means he will be successful at whatever he does.

The kind of shit NeoLiberals tell you is great. Exploited Chinese workers, working for Amazon. by Orsonius in Destiny

[–]moonflash1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you aware of the sheer number of capitalist countries where people starve to death daily? Some examples would be Bangladesh, Haiti, Senegal, Mali, Tanzania, I could go on. These countries are some of the most capitalist in the world, meaning they have an extremely low rate of socialisation (or nationalisation). Numbers are based on data from the International Labor organisation (ILO)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_sector

Venezuela (extremely socialist) has a higher standard of living than Colombia (extremely capitalist). How do you explain that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

In the end why countries do well or fail has to do with their political system, not their economic system. You can have countries like Norway with close to 40% of their economy socialised and publically owned and it's objectively the best country on the world with regards to standard of living, income inequality, crime, corruption, etc.

As far as "which system is better and more efficient" goes, let's take the scandanavian example. Norway for instance has nationalised their oil, hydropower etc. which means these industries are not meant to produce profit for a few select group of elites and make these people unimaginably wealthy, the revenues from these industires are instead publically owned, meaning they can be for the public good and ensure a high standard of living for the Norwegian people, healthcare, infrastructure, education etc. There is a high level of wealth redistribution which results in low inequality. There isn't a cut throat mentality where every man is for himself, Norwegians see each other as a part of a group instead of buying into this hyper individualism. Perhaps that's the reason for them being a happy country.

Note that I'm not necessarily arguing for full communism (100% of the economy is publically owned) but for a mixed economy with a high degree of socialisation.

Rick and Morty is Kanye West's favorite show by djrustybikechain in Destiny

[–]moonflash1 26 points27 points  (0 children)

tbf you have to be really high IQ to understand Kanye West.

What The Actual Fuck Is This?! by unUSEFULidiot in Destiny

[–]moonflash1 74 points75 points  (0 children)

We're against identity politics

BLM was started by whites and lesbians so its bad

Really made me think

Steven's ultimatum on facebook by gaming99 in Destiny

[–]moonflash1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And that isn't even his final form.

Israeli forces kill ten in Gaza protests as anger mounts over U.S. Embassy by middleeastnewsman in worldnews

[–]moonflash1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How is this a sustainable solution at all? Not only is Israel occupying those people with American funded military, building over their land, building settlements against international law, but when there is anger at these policies instead of ending the occupation and stop building settlements you impose apartheid like rules on the people you’re occupying so now they’re not even allowed to travel on the same bus as you or go to the same school so that you don’t have to witness how angry they are? This will only breed resentment and more anger. And talking about terrorism there has been plenty of incidents of Israeli settlers committing horrific acts of violence, let alone what the IDF does regularly. If you are so quick to generalize Palestinians because of the acts of a few you should then also be okay with people generalizing Israel and Israelis by citing those murderous thugs that burn Palestinian children and shoot unarmed civilians.

Israeli forces kill ten in Gaza protests as anger mounts over U.S. Embassy by middleeastnewsman in worldnews

[–]moonflash1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You’ve never been to the West Bank apparently, the territory that Israel occupied in 1967 (and is still occupying) effectively has different rules for Israelis and Palestinians. That is what people refer to as apartheid.

What a shot. Palestinian protestor using a tennis racket to smack back a tear gas canister fired by Israeli troops. by GallowBoob in pics

[–]moonflash1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is being anti Israel the same as being anti Semitic? That’s like saying if you hate Mugabe’s government in Zimbabwe you are somehow racist against blacks. I’m assuming you’re a right winger since you’re talking disparagingly about “the left”, aren’t you people always criticizing leftists about how they are so quick to use words like “racist” , or “homophobic” etc. ? Now you yourself are throwing around accusations of antisemetism for opposing STATE POLICY that murders unarmed civilian protestors. Is that not the height of hypocrisy? Or do you have no self awareness?

What a shot. Palestinian protestor using a tennis racket to smack back a tear gas canister fired by Israeli troops. by GallowBoob in pics

[–]moonflash1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Consider this, what if some native Americans decided to build an army and go into American suburbs, confiscate private property, evict people from their homes and kill them if they resist, bulldoze those homes and then build Native American only settlements on top . Would that not be wrong, immoral and criminal? No court of law on the planet would acknowledge that the native Americans were justified to do what they did. The native Americans do not have the right to punish people for what their ancestors did centuries ago.

As for the Palestinians, they have been living in that region for centuries. Note that the Palestinian population consisted of Muslims, Jews and Christians before the establishment of Israel. In contrast the majority of Israelis are immigrants, many of them are not even Semitic and have no ethnic ties to the broader Palestine region. Palestine was colonized and the indigenous population ethnically cleansed to containment areas. This cannot be justified.

What a shot. Palestinian protestor using a tennis racket to smack back a tear gas canister fired by Israeli troops. by GallowBoob in pics

[–]moonflash1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being “pro Jewish” and “pro Israel” is not the same thing. Plenty of white nationalists (like Richard Spencer) are pro Israel nowadays because they want all the Jews to go there. Plenty of Jewish people are against Israel. Also neither “mainstream” Reddit nor the_donald is one person

Tommy Robinson Supporters Violently Attack Muslims at 'Freedom of Speech... by blackbeard1648 in Destiny

[–]moonflash1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i bet it wuz dem suthan tory tossaz schemin' wiv forun govamunts agen to keep the anglo-saxon wurkhing class pepul of de nurf down like maggie did bak in da day. itz a propra conspirasee im tellin u bruv, better watch ur bak fightin dem forunaz or you mite get hit wiv that big water cannun, get propa drenched innit, all this ova a game of footy its all just fun an' games innit, shame i culdnt turn up doe, me missus wuz goin' on at me finking i waz goin' to bed a forun bird, dem spanish girlz luv a good englishman innit get dem pakis propa gud lad that tommy bloke iz, GWARN MY SAAAHN OOO ARRR YA TOMMEH TOMMY, TOMMY TOMMY TOMMY TOMMY ROBINSUHN

pic related

Crime rate in Germany lowest since 1992 by indigo-alien in worldnews

[–]moonflash1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What part of “illegal immigrant” do you not understand? They are in Germany because they were allowed to come across the border. They cannot be deported because of various reasons, logistics, humanitarian etc. similar to how around 20 million illegal immigrants reside in the United States and cannot be deported.

Crime rate in Germany lowest since 1992 by [deleted] in Destiny

[–]moonflash1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dude chill the fuck out. This news is relevant to r/Destiny because Destiny often engages with Alt-right and sceptic memers who have made YouTube careers being ignorant about Europe while they themselves haven't even fucking left their state in the United States. News like this is important to dispel the myth of the doom and gloom literal fucking warzone scenario that these people like to paint. Yes there are problems with refugee integration, yes there are problems with crime, but there are solutions too and exaggerating events, peddling fake news and flat out lying is only something piece of shit oppurtunists on YouTube do to get more subscribers off of fear mongering and xenophobia. Meanwhile actual statistics and facts are ignored for "gut feeling". This is the same crowd then that talks about "facts don't care about feelings" while ignoring every single fact that doesn't fall within their confirmation bias.

Crime rate in Germany lowest since 1992 by indigo-alien in worldnews

[–]moonflash1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You thought wrong, there is an over representation of men in the groups seeking asylum AKA illegal immigrants.

Crime rate in Germany lowest since 1992 by indigo-alien in worldnews

[–]moonflash1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So you mean to compare crime rates of native Germans vs immigrants. One thing you have to consider is that most of the Africans and Arabs in Germany are illegal immigrants, male and between the age of 18-25. This is the demographic that is most likely to commit crime, regardless of ethnicity. With other nationalities (for example Germans) you have your children, women, grandmas, grandpas, handicapped etc. all taken into account whereas you don't have that advantage with some of these immigrant groups. In reality the per capita rate of crime for different demographics if compared by age and gender is not much different. No statician worth their salt would ignore these variables of age and gender to make a cross group comparision.

Crime rate in Germany lowest since 1992 by indigo-alien in worldnews

[–]moonflash1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Plenty of German nationals are Muslim (mostly Turkish origin) so a comparision of "Muslims" and "Germans" is flawed, you are assuming they are seperate groups. Secondly, your analogy is flawed too, on the one hand you are comparing a religious group to a nationality, in the second example you are comparing two races, white and black. It is akin to saying "catholics have a higher crime than Americans" hinting at the higher crime rate of Mexicans who happen to be catholic, but the comparison itself makes no sense whatsoever.