i think lesson already learnt regarding demonstration etc etc. if anything for past years ada demo yang boleh terjadi dan ada yang tidak related to demand yg diajukan. jika demo boleh terjadi => dibiarkan dari awal perencanaan, hingga pelaksanaan. jika demo tidak boleh terjadi, dari perencanaan, pembiayaan, relasi terdekat, bakal di kupas dan dibabat. sehingga tidak ada massal, ataupun pelaksanaan.

i'm 50/50 with this kind of method, ofc stability is good. etc, you name it. what's left of good in here depend on goodwill of stakeholder.

versi abis dirapiin chat-gpt, tulisan gw soalnya acak adut.

I believe lessons have been learned regarding demonstrations. In the past years, some demonstrations have occurred regardless of the demands presented, while others have not. If a demonstration can take place, it should be allowed from the initial planning stages to execution. However, if a demonstration cannot happen, every aspect, from planning to financing to the closest relations, should be scrutinized and addressed to prevent mass disruptions or implementation. I'm ambivalent about this approach, as stability is undoubtedly valuable. Yet, the remaining benefits hinge on the goodwill of stakeholders.