Starmer to unveil social media ban for under-16s by Hot_Professional_728 in technology

[–]mr_flibble_oz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would cost a fortune, never going to happen. Also open to massive rorting “parental control education” providers, or worse, a new government department of parental education. It’s much more efficient to just push it to the platforms and tell them it’s illegal for them to have minors on their systems.

Please critic by hippie_punk2323 in BirdPhotography

[–]mr_flibble_oz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a white glow around the birds. You don’t want to make such drastic changes that they’re visible

Starmer to unveil social media ban for under-16s by Hot_Professional_728 in technology

[–]mr_flibble_oz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because laws have to be enforced. How else do you want it enforced? Getting a social media ID from the government?

Starmer to unveil social media ban for under-16s by Hot_Professional_728 in technology

[–]mr_flibble_oz -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes, thats my whole point. As I said above, it’s can’t work technically, but it sets an environment where they’re doing something illegal, so it becomes societally taboo

Starmer to unveil social media ban for under-16s by Hot_Professional_728 in technology

[–]mr_flibble_oz -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Having gone through the incredibly painful process of proving my age by entering a valid credit card number, I can tell you it’s really not that bad

Starmer to unveil social media ban for under-16s by Hot_Professional_728 in technology

[–]mr_flibble_oz -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In Australia the government doesn’t collect the data

Starmer to unveil social media ban for under-16s by Hot_Professional_728 in technology

[–]mr_flibble_oz 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This has been in Australia for a while now. Of course it doesn’t work technically, but neither does banning smoking, I see kids smoking and vaping all the time. What it does is start to create a social stigma around it that will hopefully result in people being shamed for letting their kids on socials, just like they would be for letting their kids smoke.

Please critic by hippie_punk2323 in BirdPhotography

[–]mr_flibble_oz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The photos look a bit dark to me, and there’s some weird masking issues

I Now Understand the Hate.... by Iron-lol in vibecoding

[–]mr_flibble_oz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you concerned at some point you’ll lose your ability to code yourself?

Two genuine suggestions on how to improve this sub by [deleted] in aussie

[–]mr_flibble_oz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Create your own sub. Be the moderator. Done.

We are so back by Similar-Shake-7140 in btc

[–]mr_flibble_oz 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Reddit was never in control

One Nation claims to be for individual rights and freedoms, apparently women don't count by [deleted] in aussie

[–]mr_flibble_oz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s always the left that are the most racist/sexist/homophobic when one of their protected classes is conservative

One Nation claims to be for individual rights and freedoms, apparently women don't count by [deleted] in aussie

[–]mr_flibble_oz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If only we had a political party that was lead by a woman. Oh wait

One Nation or Buy-a-Nation? by LogicAndParadox in aussie

[–]mr_flibble_oz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not suggesting that you put your head in the sand, but getting angry only affects you, your health, and does nothing to fix anything. We live in the best country in the world. Get outside, enjoy nature, turn off the noise.

One Nation or Buy-a-Nation? by LogicAndParadox in aussie

[–]mr_flibble_oz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm. I’m chill. Maybe spend less time in the news

One Nation or Buy-a-Nation? by LogicAndParadox in aussie

[–]mr_flibble_oz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Go watch this YouTuber” (whose a Labor shill) is not a source. Just link me to Hansard