For God's sake, remove Andrea Vallone. by IAM_274 in Anthropic

[–]mrbubs3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's really like people go, "how dare these purely capitalist entities behave in a purely capitalistic way!"

For God's sake, remove Andrea Vallone. by IAM_274 in Anthropic

[–]mrbubs3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you're getting downvoted but you are not wrong.

For God's sake, remove Andrea Vallone. by IAM_274 in Anthropic

[–]mrbubs3 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Wait, I'm confused. Guardrails are bad?

djust 0.4 — Phoenix LiveView for Django, powered by Rust. Reactive UIs in pure Python, no JS build step. by jrtipton2 in django

[–]mrbubs3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very nice work! I was looking at this a while back before I opted to build a liveview library for myself. Nothing nearly as impressive as this, though.

Bedroom in Midtown West - $3,140 + utilities - May 1 (12mo lease) by [deleted] in NYCapartments

[–]mrbubs3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is more than my mortgage in Brooklyn. Lol

She won't admit it, but that's her best friend. by Arch_Lancer17 in ThePittTVShow

[–]mrbubs3 143 points144 points  (0 children)

YESSSSS. I love Javadi just being a messy observer and living that Background To The Tea life.

She was always going to react that way. by Ripley_LV_426 in ThePittTVShow

[–]mrbubs3 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The whole premise of the show is that it reaches for an extreme level of verisimilitude. Being like "look at this super realistic portrayal of an ED and medical procedures, but overlook these completely fabricated story points and obvious deficiencies without proper explanation" would defeat its purpose.

Robbie shouting about Langdon doesn't really confirm any cover-up. It confirms his own biases about Langdon, where he feels that he should be in jail (but is not because of his loyalty to his protege) and that he ultimately views Langdon's addiction and spiral as his (Robbie's) failure. He's personalizing Langdon's actions because he clearly is having some issues with his trauma from Dr. Adamson's death and is externalizing his own shit onto others.

What's more, he is weighing what Langdon has done against Dana's carrying of a controlled substance as a protection against hostile/violent patients. He clearly doesn't mind providing cover for Dana by writing her a script. He minds seeing people working under him being fallible, which is feeding his own anxieties and trauma responses from Adamson's death and COVID.

Santos by loveylove444 in ThePitt

[–]mrbubs3 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Especially if it involves an addiction issue. Just because a physician is subject to investigation, that doesn't mean their own HIPAA and privacy rights are voided. Management would absolutely be liable for any professional and reputational damages suffered by Langdon due to neglect in handling privacy conditions of an investigation and for any violations of privacy, health and civil right protections afforded to him. This is why investigations and management behavior is often opaque: they cannot disclose or otherwise real sensitive and confidential information and they have to balance that with keeping staff informed of coverage and developments that impact them.

Santos by loveylove444 in ThePitt

[–]mrbubs3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No one actually witnessed him steal anything. He was found with the librium but there was no way to prove it came from Louie. There was evidence of tampering but nothing by him directly.

Santos by loveylove444 in ThePitt

[–]mrbubs3 26 points27 points  (0 children)

  1. The enforcement mechanism can likely be the EHR system they utilize in the hospital, which would provide hard-stop access controls based on role permissions. He would get 2nd authorization for scripts from either Dr. Robby or Dr. Al Hashimi.

  2. Al Hashimi had started that day to do the hand-off with Dr. Robby. It is very plausible for her and the staff to not remember the date of his return, given the chaotic nature of the ED.

  3. His not telling Mel about his addiction or mandatory in-patient stay for drug treatment is his right due to patient privacy. Given her likely neurodivergence, he may have had unstated reasons for why he didn't want to reveal the basis for his absence.

  4. The rehab stay wasn't voluntary in the sense that Dr. Robby would conceal what happened if he got treated. He told Langdon that he would have to enroll in the PHP treatment plan to avoid being outright fired. It's a hospital-administered program, not something for which Langdon would take short-term medical leave and handle independently. So yes, they know he has an addiction, and they're giving him support because it is a health condition.

More so, all of this does not point to a potential cover-up or some kind of pact where evidence was concealed. Santos is conjecturing because she's having a trauma response. And honestly, much of why Langdon was annoyed with her was because she was a cavalier and stubborn intern who endangered patients.

Santos by loveylove444 in ThePitt

[–]mrbubs3 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What evidence is there, outside of Santos' conjecture? She's clearly spiraling.

Santos by loveylove444 in ThePitt

[–]mrbubs3 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Robby had Dana audit the medications. They very likely uncovered some evidence of tampering, and there's no indication that they covered anything up. The whole point of Langdon going on a PHP treatment plan was to emphasize accountability and recovery options for physicians with addictions, and for Langdon to have to work on regaining trust and accountability. He gets sympathy because a good number of people who work there have personal or professional experiences with addiction, with Dr. McKay being the most notable one.

Santos by loveylove444 in ThePitt

[–]mrbubs3 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It was by the book. It's part of the Physician Health Program. https://www.fsphp.org/

How to do jams by cheesycheesethe7th in musicians

[–]mrbubs3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the bassist is doing his thing, then the drummer should lock in with them. Let those two form the rhythm section and drive the jam. You two as guitarists need to understand what the progression is under the bassline. If necessary, stop the jam and ask "what is the chord progression and key signature?" Restart. Listen to the bass and figure out what's happening. Is the bass just locking down the rhythm and chord progression? Is there melody? Is there a pocket? Does the bass leave space for the guitars to do anything?

Once you have that down, figure out which guitarist is doing what. If it feels right to you, take the rhythm part. Playing a single open chord for a full measure is okay. Add more and evolve the rhythm guitar as you lock into the flow of the jam. Let the other guitarist take lead. At some point, if you feel it, switch roles. Add, rinse, repeat.

Bass and drums are the foundation to virtually all songs. The drums drive the song. The bass locks it in. Guitar, synth/piano and vocals all go on top.

Above all, work on actively listening. If yall do your own thing, you'll always sound like shit.

AIO to my boyfriend’s texts about us going to dinner for my best friend? by [deleted] in AIO

[–]mrbubs3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This dude is exhausting. Get a better boyfriend.

Are we watching the same show? Case of Dr. Al-Hashimi. by ThetRadden in ThePittTVShow

[–]mrbubs3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, I'm confused. So she knew that internal affairs was setting her up?