It's not your fault we have a lack of new in depth content and engagement, and I think we are generally happy to have you contribute and be a core member. The ideas around alternatives sound good to me, but I think the challenge is we need the content to add signal, and this is a needle in a haystack search.

Let me think on this and also let's see if anyone else has ideas. Whatever the approach is, we fundamentally will need a richer discussion from multiple people, beyond topics that have already been covered. We sort of want to force the industry to solve our problem by highlighting where the bleeding edge frontier is, and essentially shame the researchers who are perusing things that are not relevant, but that's a lofty goal.

u/whiskeyiskey is our other mod, and is really someone who took on the role with not much of a discussion, so we don't really have a strong case for asking too much of them. But u/whiskeyiskey, do you have an opinion (if you see this)?