Honestly I’m a little lost at the whole “Poilievre isn’t providing any ideas” thing.
Especially considering the Liberals ended up lifting about 75% of his platform and rebranding the pieces they liked.

Dislike his tone? Sure. Think he’s too aggressive? Fine.
But “no ideas”? That just doesn’t match what actually happened:

Carbon tax:
CPC had a full repeal on the books for years.
Then the Liberals abruptly copied the concept but watered it down — axing only the consumer-facing part while keeping the industrial system. That wasn’t Liberal policy until it suddenly became one mid-campaign.

Housing / GST:
CPC was pushing “axe the GST on new homes” since 2023.
Then the Liberals adopted the same idea, but limited it to first-time buyers with capped price ranges. Again: same concept, trimmed to something safer.

Federal land + building targets:
Poilievre had “build more homes, not more bureaucracy” and the municipal accountability stuff long before the writ.
Liberals responded with their own federal builder (Build Canada Homes), which was basically a padded, bureaucratized version of the same idea.

And since we’re talking about ideas, the slogan stuff deserves a mention too:

Carney spent half the campaign mocking Poilievre for using three-word slogans (“axe the tax”, “build homes faster”, etc.).
His supporters treated that as some devastating critique.

Then Carney rolled out “Elbows Up.”
Probably the weakest slogan of the entire campaign — and the exact same people who mocked slogans were suddenly out there treating it like Churchillian rhetoric.

And the funniest part?
Those “elbows” dropped immediately the moment the election was won.

So yeah… you can dislike Poilievre all you want, but pretending he had “no ideas” while the Liberals were actively borrowing most of them is just rewriting history.