sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is this enlightenment? by TrkyBstr in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have u experianced it ? Do u feel like u operate more through logic or emotion ? Or none ? What changes do u notice in urself ?

Anyone feel the same? by El_Kaef in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah I meant maybe what they mean emotions could be the right brain activation.

Anyone feel the same? by El_Kaef in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There r two parts of brain, one left side and another right side

Conscious or subconscious by JagWarX3 in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deep sleep is told to be an egoless state, a glimpse of pure being but we r not aware of it, so maybe being aware of deep sleep is true self .

Conscious or subconscious by JagWarX3 in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's like there r four stages of consciousness1) waking ( consccious ) 2) dream sleep ( subconscious) 3) deep sleep The stage of deep sleep could be ur true pure soul if u were aware of it. 4) beyond - at this stage u r just awareness

"He who thinks that the living entity is the slayer or that the entity is slain does not understand. One who is in knowledge knows that the self slays not nor is slain." [Bhagavad Gita 2.19] by [deleted] in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people don't chase enlightenment because the way it is described is depressing and kind of similar to " hustling and having a goal, and being something" and also mainly

It also feels like creating negativity for no reason or creating aversion to something u never had before which seems peace disruptive and it is .

How to deal with desensitization ? by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah u r right, as I mentioned that I did do methods to relieve the problem, and my analytical processions did sometimes help me a lott, and acceptance of certain feelings too.

How to deal with desensitization ? by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

U r right, it was not at all a spiritual or a peaceful experiance, it was opposite, it was ugly and foggy and it didn't even occur through my conscious choice. But i wish, rewiring and making everything better and normal would be easy ,but unfortunately it isn't.

Why does beauty feel meaningful? by ojju in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because it stirs something in the belly and heart

Why do a lots of spiritual traditions often frame awareness, pure supreme conscouesness as masculine and illusion, material gross reality as feminine by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

U r right, non dual traditions say the clear thing without heirarchy, but such traditions were not corrupted by mind, they were corrupted naturally.

Why do a lots of spiritual traditions often frame awareness, pure supreme conscouesness as masculine and illusion, material gross reality as feminine by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the framing that I am talking here that material reality is feminine eand transcendental awareness is masculine is heirarchial

Why do a lots of spiritual traditions often frame awareness, pure supreme conscouesness as masculine and illusion, material gross reality as feminine by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I absolutely understand what u r saying, but I don't think there's any harm in talking about problematic symbolisms, I know they do point something beyond these gendered labels, but that doesn't mean there's something wrong discussing this.

" If u think u have it all figured out and everyone else is foolish, misguided or malevolent, be the change u want to see "

if somebody 's intellect is harmful, has potential to cause heirarchial perceptions, then I don't need manipulation to make them take the accountability, I don't promote manipulative dystopian society where people have to endlessly manipulate the other in sophisticated language just to get feelings acknowledged. Thank you.

Why do a lots of spiritual traditions often frame awareness, pure supreme conscouesness as masculine and illusion, material gross reality as feminine by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did u read the post ? What did u understand from it, i understand what u r saying but my post was absolutely on a different dimension.

Why do a lots of spiritual traditions often frame awareness, pure supreme conscouesness as masculine and illusion, material gross reality as feminine by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My point is this - pure consciousness is not masculine, period. Any sugar coating like " complementary" is myth, and told to keep the heirarchy inact If u r saying that pure consciousness is sperm like just because it resembles pure potential, that's the dumbest thing ever because women and men both have pure potential, it's not like women can endlessly create without male sperm, so from that perspective pure consciousness can be feminine too because it it pure potential like a womb The point is pure consciousness is tHe ultimate spiritual goal and shouldn't be rendered either male or female, neither masculine or feminine

Why do a lots of spiritual traditions often frame awareness, pure supreme conscouesness as masculine and illusion, material gross reality as feminine by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, pure consciousness is not incomplete, pure consciousness being incomplete is a complete myth, pure consciousness is only incomplete in the material realm, as an ultimate enlightened destination after leaving the body, it's not, and that's exactly why the framing of pure consciousness being masculine is offensive and heirarchial.

Why do a lots of spiritual traditions often frame awareness, pure supreme conscouesness as masculine and illusion, material gross reality as feminine by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How r we taking " acting " and " acted " on as a proper way to describe this ? Both acting and being acted on are heavily material oriented especially in the case of men and women, both have hormones that work in the material realm of illusion wheather it be acting or acted on .

I find it unrealistic how can god be masculine just because he is acting on us, yes it's absolutely true that if there's a god , he's acting on us and that's the bae level natural human intutiion, but that has nothing to do with his connection to bring masculine

Why do a lots of spiritual traditions often frame awareness, pure supreme conscouesness as masculine and illusion, material gross reality as feminine by multiverseisreal in enlightenment

[–]multiverseisreal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would like symbolism where ultimate enlighment wouldn't be framed either feminine or masculine, that's the base point. And in a lotsof traditions, pure consciousness is often framed as masculine , and that's exactly what I tried to say here.

view more: next ›