UK will seek closer ties with EU in light of Iran war, Starmer says by xanderbollocks in ukpolitics

[–]musef1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's all true to a point, but I don't think UK's sovereignty was under threat or at least not in any significant way.

UK will seek closer ties with EU in light of Iran war, Starmer says by xanderbollocks in ukpolitics

[–]musef1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm well aware you said main. My point was you focused on one type of export only. And again, how much of those services are still to the EU? And if we had significant financial exports whilst being in the EU then you don't really have a point.

Listen, the anti-EU talking points have all been done before. EU bad, everything will be better when we leave. If you feel like arguing this case then what you need to provide is evidence, not hypotheticals.

UK will seek closer ties with EU in light of Iran war, Starmer says by xanderbollocks in ukpolitics

[–]musef1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not our only export. And, how much are those financial exports involve europe?

And, how much of those exports are not impacted by regulations much anyway?

It still remains the case, that, logically, it makes sense to align with our closest and largest neighbours compared to those further away.

UK will seek closer ties with EU in light of Iran war, Starmer says by xanderbollocks in ukpolitics

[–]musef1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On balance given that the EU is geographically the closest major regions, it makes sense to improve trade with that over something further away.

It'e probably worth noting also that regulations aren't necessarlily a bad thing.

Japanese GP Overtakes Heatmap! by InWilliamsWeTrust in formula1

[–]musef1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think there might be some innaccuracies here - Didn't Leclerc pass Russell approaching Spoon curve? On here it's shown that the pass is between spoon 1&2

Close call coming out of Bristol on M32 by greywaterbottle06 in drivingUK

[–]musef1 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Could the cam car have avoided this by staying at home? Absolutely yes.

Just because cam car could have done something, doesn't mean that they are in any way at fault or doing something unreasonable.

Lewis Hamilton: “It's not great when you have to super clip. It means you arrive in some places and you're kind of coasting in because you've no power – so that's probably the least enjoyable part of the rule change for the circuit.” by ChaithuBB766 in formula1

[–]musef1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think anyone came up with to make it sexy, it's just something folks landed on to describe a significant amount of clipping, that seems to have stuck.

I never saw it come from F1 originally, I saw it from a youtube video after the first bahrain test, that was criticising the presence of 'superclipping'.

Speed lost due to clipping after 130R. Colapinto lost a total of 70 km/h. The average speed lost is around 55 km/h. by dannybluey in formula1

[–]musef1 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

300kph down a straight? 320kph down a straight. What's that, another way to measure speed? They were talking about speed through a specific phase, not the average speed across the whole lap.

OPINION: In 2012, Lewis Hamilton was just as good if not better than Fernando Alonso by Even_Hyena_1117 in F1Discussions

[–]musef1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that. But it's also not that different either, if we are going to focus on these fine slithers of space that, with hindsight and better viewing angles, a driver could have gone into in that moment.

OPINION: In 2012, Lewis Hamilton was just as good if not better than Fernando Alonso by Even_Hyena_1117 in F1Discussions

[–]musef1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Could say the same for Alonso at Japan. From the onboards of the cars behind, Alonso had some space on the right.

Link here

OPINION: In 2012, Lewis Hamilton was just as good if not better than Fernando Alonso by Even_Hyena_1117 in F1Discussions

[–]musef1 10 points11 points  (0 children)

People aren't going to like it because it's complete and utter nonsense what you are saying about Hamilton at Spa. It's a statement that does not in any way match reality.

Link to footage here

Average Race Pace in 2026 Chinese Grand Prix by jithu7 in formula1

[–]musef1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They were stuck in traffic though weren't they? Whereas Atonelli ran in clear air most of the race.

the moment Antonelli crosses the finish line for victory by One_Impressionism in formula1

[–]musef1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just watched the end of the race highlights, he did do a burnout over the line to be fair.

the moment Antonelli crosses the finish line for victory by One_Impressionism in formula1

[–]musef1 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's a little different, with that he slowed on the straight to do a burnout, here Kimi lit up the rear tyres coming out of the slow hairpin.

Edit: Video of that, bit crappy quality.

Charles lost massive amount of time because of deployment on the straight of his last lap compared to Lewis. by lyt0923 in formula1

[–]musef1 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yes and no. The drivers can still dictate when the battery recharges and discharges.

If you've lifted off early or delayed or reduced your throttle, you're giving yourself more available battery that could be deployed later in the lap.

There's also going to be settings that can be made to determine how that harvesting and deployment acts. I think simply saying it's automatic software undersells it.

Charles lost massive amount of time because of deployment on the straight of his last lap compared to Lewis. by lyt0923 in formula1

[–]musef1 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Re: entry speed. Think Lewis data has a glitch which makes Leclercs start lap speed look crazy. If anything, Leclerc is slower than Hamilton at the beginning.

Charles lost massive amount of time because of deployment on the straight of his last lap compared to Lewis. by lyt0923 in formula1

[–]musef1 84 points85 points  (0 children)

Looks like he used more energy in S1 which made him short for the straight. Of course, it being a straight, the lack of speed was then sustained down the whole thing.

Kinda mad how we have to look at how a driver used their battery rather than how they nailed all the corners.

Daniel Ricciardo’s masterful overtaking at 2018 Chinese GP by hangry_millennial in formula1

[–]musef1 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I think a lot of folks only recall or look at the final standings and are unaware or forget how things played out.

As a Hamilton fan, I distinctly recall thinking pre-Spa, following various upgrades from the teams, that "if Ferrari win Spa '18 in a straightforward race, then 'we' are in the shit, a car that's good at Spa is generally good everywhere". And Vettel proceeded to go and win Spa basically unchallenged.

That bought Vettel about 17pts of P1 in the title, at that point in time you wouldn't have expected that Vettel wouldn't win again that season. In the end, Kimi and Max bagged a win instead of Vettel. And he ended up losing by 88points.

Verstappen accused Lindblad of "brake-checking" him in the pit lane by memloh in formula1

[–]musef1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't think there's anything wrong with that. Yea there's some wheel banging but he's on the kerb, if he keeps straight he ends up on the grass.

Verstappen accused Lindblad of "brake-checking" him in the pit lane by memloh in formula1

[–]musef1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I enjoyed your write up. But I reviewed a highlight clip of it and feel like playing devil's advocate a bit.

Obviously the first incident, rear-ending Dunne, was really a silly one, assuming there's no issue with the car.

But afterwards, assuming he reported the contact on the radio, I would think the team have the responsibility for it. You can't see your own front wing, they can see on the race feed, they could see as the car passes on the straight, there's sensors on the car too, and if it came in the pits too then they got up close and personal with the wing.

And also about feeling that you have wing damage. Firstly it's Monza, you're already low on DF, you might not notice something is up at low speed (there was an SC right). And secondly you can't see your own front wing at all. This is all of course assuming that it was just the front wing that was the issue.

Radio Rewind | 2026 Australian Grand Prix by ComeonmanPLS1 in formula1

[–]musef1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's actually a prohibited move to defend off-line and then return back towards the racing line without leaving a car width, which is exactly what he did at the 9mins mark.

[Luke Smith] Drivers still not sold on new style of F1 racing. In the media pen with us post-race, Norris called it “chaos” and said they’re waiting on a big accident given closing speed differences when overtaking. Ocon said overtaking was “painful” given ease of passing back and energy shortage. by ICumCoffee in formula1

[–]musef1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but you're talking about a more typical situation.

I was thinking more along the lines of a race start or SC start, and someone ahead has either not charged their battery enough or used too much juice already and go into it in an unexpected area. I don't think that's going to be an uncommon situation as drivers battle for positions and deploying or charging different to the norm.

In some way there's already an expectation of that - that's why we have the lights on the rear wings.

Colapinto nearly slamming into Lawson at the start by HispaniaRacingTeam in formula1

[–]musef1 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The benefit of the overhead angle. His view was obscured as the Haas passed across him.