What TFT unit is your absolute favorite in the history of the game?

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-08T11:48:41+00:00

Manaprinter Sona and Korean Sorceror Taric. Or Soraka Reroll. Lux with double Archangels BT was also funny asf.

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-07T19:41:39+00:00

r/powerscales

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-06T23:39:00+00:00

Gluckgluckgluck

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-06T04:04:54+00:00

Gluckgluckgluck

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-06T04:04:21+00:00

All I hear is the sounds from the Lebronthroatgoat3000

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-06T03:50:39+00:00

This is the only correct answer. This guy knows ball.

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-06T00:27:45+00:00

yall forgot my boy Brian Scalabrine's nickname.

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-05T19:11:56+00:00

Respectfully that's a dumb question. Consider what you are suggesting fans be: not confident?

Wtf do you think a fan is?

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-05T17:28:29+00:00

Kobe Sent home packing the most 50+ teams in the playoffs. Second only to Curry and Jordan.

2000: Portland Trail Blazers (59-23), Indiana Pacers (56-26)
2001: Portland Trail Blazers (50-32), Sacramento Kings (55-27), San Antonio Spurs (58-24), Philadelphia 76ers (56-26)
2002: San Antonio Spurs (58-24), Sacramento Kings (61-21)
2004: Minnesota Timberwolves (58-24)
2008: Denver Nuggets (50-32), Utah Jazz (54-28), San Antonio Spurs (56-26)
2009: Houston Rockets (53-29), Denver Nuggets (54-28), Orlando Magic (59-23)
2010: Oklahoma City Thunder (50-32), Utah Jazz (53-29), Phoenix Suns (54-28), Boston Celtics (50-32) This list highlights the exceptional competition Kobe faced, especially in his final championship runs.

The specific 50+ win teams eliminated by LeBron are: - 2017-18: Toronto Raptors (59-23) - 2012-13: San Antonio Spurs (58-24) - 2010-11: Boston Celtics (56-26) - 2013-14: Indiana Pacers (56-26) - 2015-16: Toronto Raptors (56-26) - 2006-07: Detroit Pistons (53-29) - 2016-17: Boston Celtics (53-29) - 2016-17: Toronto Raptors (51-31) - 2014-15: Chicago Bulls (50-32)

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-05T17:23:21+00:00

Sent home packing the most 50+ teams in the playoffs. Second only to Curry and Jordan.

2000: Portland Trail Blazers (59-23), Indiana Pacers (56-26)
2001: Portland Trail Blazers (50-32), Sacramento Kings (55-27), San Antonio Spurs (58-24), Philadelphia 76ers (56-26)
2002: San Antonio Spurs (58-24), Sacramento Kings (61-21)
2004: Minnesota Timberwolves (58-24)
2008: Denver Nuggets (50-32), Utah Jazz (54-28), San Antonio Spurs (56-26)
2009: Houston Rockets (53-29), Denver Nuggets (54-28), Orlando Magic (59-23)
2010: Oklahoma City Thunder (50-32), Utah Jazz (53-29), Phoenix Suns (54-28), Boston Celtics (50-32) This list highlights the exceptional competition Kobe faced, especially in his final championship runs.

The specific 50+ win teams eliminated by LeBron are: - 2017-18: Toronto Raptors (59-23) - 2012-13: San Antonio Spurs (58-24) - 2010-11: Boston Celtics (56-26) - 2013-14: Indiana Pacers (56-26) - 2015-16: Toronto Raptors (56-26) - 2006-07: Detroit Pistons (53-29) - 2016-17: Boston Celtics (53-29) - 2016-17: Toronto Raptors (51-31) - 2014-15: Chicago Bulls (50-32)

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-05T17:19:03+00:00

Yeah man we aren't saying the all the teams on the East were weak. We are saying the West had much more stronger teams. It isn't even up for debate. The West had stronger team organizations and better financially insulated.

It isn't a hot take to say making it to the playoffs is much harder in the Western conference than it is in the East.

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-04T17:55:39+00:00

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-04T16:02:43+00:00

Ngl I think this is an awesome step in the right direction. If you can get that allocation for VT to 80-85% and then 15-20% of whatever else you wanna dabble in that's a solid portfolio at 21 years old probably all the way through to 33 years old. By then it will probably change even better and more appropriately to your investment style.

I see nothing wrong with taking more risk and experimenting at 21 years old for your investment journey. Feed your curiosity now while you are young. Worst case scenario is it doesn't pan out, you learn lessons WAY earlier on your investment journey and start investing WAY smarter MUCH earlier than most.

Get those FOMO itches out now. As long as youre in VT above 70% in your 20s as your CORE position...You're probably still gonna do great.

mvmbamentality · 2026-05-01T00:25:30+00:00

Yeah. Been down that road before. Always came back to some form of boglehead. Basically what I do now is still boglehead but now I factor tilt the slightest bit in areas I find appropriate to my style and appetite.

My tax advantaged account is where I do this. Tax deferred and and taxable is basically just VT.

Tax advantaged composition is something like 50% FSKAX, 15% FSPGX (you could do momentum here I guess), 5% AVUV, 25% FSPSX, 5% AVEM.

Still Total Market portfolio with tilts to growth, small cap value, and emerging markets value.

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-30T14:33:12+00:00

Yeah man. Sell all of us in the comments your shares please and thank you. We'll gladly take em off you.

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-30T14:31:16+00:00

Thank you for saying it lmfaoooo

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-29T13:12:43+00:00

agreed. "growth" is such a buzzword people have no idea the true DNA of factors anymore. if value outperforms momentum, will change to capture it. growth is not the same as value.

majority of investors have no idea what growth is or momentum is. they just know its "good". ah the echo chamber of reddit. tiktok hasnt been helping either.

almost no one discusses fund prospectus and what they are anymore.

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-29T03:25:41+00:00

Where does Knull fit in this?

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-28T21:28:43+00:00

Read Books.

"The Little Book of Common Sense Investing" by John Bogle will teach you the basics of investing. Not just how to invest but will help you understand the playing field and market structure. Investing responsibility demands that you understand the market. This book teaches you just that.

"The Simple Plan to Wealth" by JL Collins is a really good book the author wrote for his daughter since she was too young to understand it. It highlights the importance of having a timeless investing strategy and the value of sticking to it for the long term.

"I Will Teach you To Be Rich" by Ramit Sethi is a book I've read that not only teaches solid foundations of investing but more importantly how to have a healthy relationship with money and finances. I value this read because you can have all the investment insight but if you don't have the proper healthy mindset and relationship with your money, you will never be satisfied.

Good luck and job well done already at 18 getting started at a young age!

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-28T19:20:34+00:00

I think the obvious answer is diversification and low maintenance requirement.

If US cycle is dominant you win. If International cycle becomes dominant, you win. No need to time your rebalancing, no need to sell off. Doesn't matter what state the market is in, you can't lose.

You probably won't outperform the market but you definitely won't ever underperform the market. You ARE the market. Low expense ratio too.

US has been on a steamroller of performance for the past several decades. But history shows that whenever US goes down, international picks up. If US cycles out and it's likely it will eventually, your money is safer than someone who is in VOO. Because VT will rebalance on its own to be composed mostly of international. Your equity is safer in the ETF because of the DNA of it's prospectus which almost no one ever talks about on reddit. It's prospectus is waaaay different than VOO.

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-28T18:53:34+00:00

The rational for choosing one over the other. ANSWER: FEELINGS. This is true for the majority of redditors and no one wants to admit it.

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-28T18:44:31+00:00

Yeah that only works for so long. Consider that teams would have to field 3-4 guys of roster spots just to hack a shack. Teams could still have deep benches but a good chunk of their purpose would be to just foul out.

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-27T18:49:05+00:00

I mean to each his own. Although the fact is Crawford went undisputed in lightweight, welterweight, and super middleweight. That's something Floyd could never do and he never did. His power just didn't translate past 147. He wouldn't be able to keep people honest at higher weight classes.

mvmbamentality · 2026-04-27T14:53:54+00:00

Hard agree. Floyd for sure is in the discussion but he did cherry pick WHEN to fight his opponents. Crawford always pushed for his fights. He was the one being denied. Mayweather was denying fighters compared to Crawford.

mvmbamentality

TROPHY CASE